2070

Lawyer. Building

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@EricCryptoman tg btw

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@CryptoKaleo weddings not cheap !

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@Peyoteone i’d dust off the wallet for this

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@EricCryptoman @aitovki hey - where at? or was it from a different account?

can confirm our firm handles these kinds of things all the time

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@CryptoKaleo love this man. congrats to both of yall, she rocks!

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@blknoiz06 waltonchain

still stoked about my giveaway, thanks walton team!

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@rasmr_eth your incessant need to exude superiority will one day be your legal downfall, rasmr

i’m not even really playing the crypto game rn, have barely posted in the last 4 months bc the case volume has been crazy

that volume is filled with people who tweet shit like this

take care

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@MidCurveMortal @seyong perspective*

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@gab_pnl @0xDinoCrypto @Polymarket hi @0xDinoCrypto

$10,000 definitely not enough to litigate against a platform like Polymarket, but if you are serious about this, DMs always open

love u gab

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@0xxpain @cmdoerfler @BalaiBB You’re both idiots btw

Stop opining on the law when you can’t read a statute, private investigators pay for information all the time

it’s literally how the industry exists

[2070 @Punk_2070]

This is wrong btw

18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7) (the only provision relevant here) requires “the intent to commit, or to aid or abet, or in connection with, any unlawful activity that constitutes a violation of Federal law”

Zero reason to believe Zach has the requisite intent, all signs point towards the opposite: that he intends to refer LABS people to law enforcement (as he has done on innumerable occasions previously)

You’re a moron and have done nothing but harm here, delete your account

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@Fishysrevenge @SOLwham @nicodotfun @coffeebreak_YT No, it’s not

[2070 @Punk_2070]

This is wrong btw

18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7) (the only provision relevant here) requires “the intent to commit, or to aid or abet, or in connection with, any unlawful activity that constitutes a violation of Federal law”

Zero reason to believe Zach has the requisite intent, all signs point towards the opposite: that he intends to refer LABS people to law enforcement (as he has done on innumerable occasions previously)

You’re a moron and have done nothing but harm here, delete your account

[2070 @Punk_2070]

This is wrong btw

18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7) (the only provision relevant here) requires “the intent to commit, or to aid or abet, or in connection with, any unlawful activity that constitutes a violation of Federal law”

Zero reason to believe Zach has the requisite intent, all signs point towards the opposite: that he intends to refer LABS people to law enforcement (as he has done on innumerable occasions previously)

You’re a moron and have done nothing but harm here, delete your account

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@tayvano_ @arbitrumdao_gov hey I DM’d you whenever you get a second

[2070 @Punk_2070]

Ok, here’s the deal with this Arbitrum motion.

Not legal advice.

-Kim et al should not have a viable claim of ownership to the funds currently frozen by Arbitrum’s security council. When DPRK steals something, they do not have good title to that thing. /1

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@lex_node naw, just wait for the next crypto-adjacent law suit to come through and then throw the screenshot of the complaint into claude

“I read this so you don’t have to 🧵”

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@zachxbt @jpthor dm pls

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@tayvano_ uncomfortably well said

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@aave @tayvano_ Good points, MoCo is good crypto counsel

Well done here

[2070 @Punk_2070]

so in a literal sense, you may be right

in a legal sense, all communication about this freeze has been that it will help to “plug the hole” and “compensate kelp victims”

a court would probably treat that as the SC holding these assets in trust for Kelp to do that

as an aside, it is a distinction without a difference, as it would all need to end up doing what you describe unless Kelp wants to get sued under a similar theory

[2070 @Punk_2070]

@andy8052 entire generation of CT that does not understand this reference 😔

[2070 @Punk_2070]

gm

If you will be in Miami for @consensus2026 this week, hmu

I’ll be the lawyer who is drinking with a certain sadness in his eyes