#Quantum and #Bitcoin enthusiast❤️Quantum Awareness ❤️ No quantum security, no future ❤️ No investment advice here❤️AI Creator ❤️Love peace and freedom❤️
🚨#Bitcoin will go to zero as the U.S. government phases out the elliptic curve algorithms it uses. If Bitcoin doesn't transition to #quantum-resistant, it will inevitably cause irreversible losses to investors. 😭
#Whistleblower
NIST IR 8547 LINK👇
https://t.co/HHZWqyC9xv
@VitalikButerin As @ethlabs_org said today, #Ethereum probably could be quantum-safe entirely before 2027...
It could be a finishable target if Ethereum get quantum-safe as top priority from what I have suggest Ethereum from 2024..
While Now get start, very ambitious!
https://t.co/72JIBZVDoU
@isabellasg3@bitcoinofficesv@RicardoBSalinas TBH, We respect Ricardo @RicardoBSalinas while bitcoin could very probably be abandoned by Gen-Z, Alpha and youngers soon!
And by quantum too, as bitcoin gets few chance to be entirely quantum-safe even by the yr of 2035.
Re-visit your decision! Isa! and Ricardo! pls!
💥BREAKING: IBM announces its next-generation Nighthawk r3 quantum processor!
🔹 2,034 physical qubits, including 520 programmable qubits.
🔹 Designed to execute 10,000 quantum operations.
🔹 10 chip-to-chip interconnects for scalability.
🔹 Plans to connect two processors into a 1,040-qubit system in 2027.
Meanwhile, IBM reports that clients and partners have run over 34 billion quantum circuits on Nighthawk r2, with reported speedups of up to 19× over previous IBM quantum processors in certain workloads.
NEW: XRP Ledger unveils plan to introduce quantum-resistant accounts
The upgrade will allow users to strengthen account security against quantum threats without additional transaction fees, as Ripple targets full quantum protection by 2028.
@0xchainink Have you heard of #Raqcoin, the first cryptocurrency to use quantum-resistant #multivariate signature algorithms? #POW
https://t.co/qnK5zCSbUs
Have you heard of #Raqcoin?
As far as I know about #Raqcoin
1. Quantum resistant
2. First Multivariate Digital Signature with #Zipcodinization
3. Zipcodinization, public keys can be compressed to around 100 bytes (Corrections are welcome)
4. Has smaller public keys and signatures
5. 90-year Proof-of-Work
6. Use an early version of the Bitcoin codebase
7. Offline Verification
8. Reduce quarter every 4 years
9. Multivariate Mining (mathematically meaningful) — not Hash Mining
10. Mining with NVIDIA GPUs (seems to also support ASIC miners)
11. Verifying transactions for the same address is faster
12. Under the framework of ABC Coin, whose original parameters had been broken and whose security level was below 1, new parameters 1, 3, and 5 were adopted, and, using algorithm agility, the coin was forked into a new coin, Raqcoin, based on UOV and Rainbow
13. Crypto-agility(UOV& Rainbow ) signature,Convert between addresses of different security levels (7kinds)
14. The mining power has been monopolized by some teams, making solo mining very difficult
15. Total supply is 2.1 billion, with around 1 billion currently mined https://t.co/ztQtWfQfnk
16. Still not listed on exchanges after 8 years
GitHub👇
https://t.co/j7WrwZkTwm
No investment advice here: don’t buy anything from unknown sources—just study it.
@oct_gems@grok Have you heard of #Raqcoin, the first cryptocurrency to use quantum-resistant #multivariate signature algorithms? #POW
https://t.co/chhNZDFPUI
Have you heard of #Raqcoin?
As far as I know about #Raqcoin
1. Quantum resistant
2. First Multivariate Digital Signature with #Zipcodinization
3. Zipcodinization, public keys can be compressed to around 100 bytes (Corrections are welcome)
4. Has smaller public keys and signatures
5. 90-year Proof-of-Work
6. Use an early version of the Bitcoin codebase
7. Offline Verification
8. Reduce quarter every 4 years
9. Multivariate Mining (mathematically meaningful) — not Hash Mining
10. Mining with NVIDIA GPUs (seems to also support ASIC miners)
11. Verifying transactions for the same address is faster
12. Under the framework of ABC Coin, whose original parameters had been broken and whose security level was below 1, new parameters 1, 3, and 5 were adopted, and, using algorithm agility, the coin was forked into a new coin, Raqcoin, based on UOV and Rainbow
13. Crypto-agility(UOV& Rainbow ) signature,Convert between addresses of different security levels (7kinds)
14. The mining power has been monopolized by some teams, making solo mining very difficult
15. Total supply is 2.1 billion, with around 1 billion currently mined https://t.co/ztQtWfQfnk
16. Still not listed on exchanges after 8 years
GitHub👇
https://t.co/j7WrwZkTwm
No investment advice here: don’t buy anything from unknown sources—just study it.
✅GSA/NIST Briefing: Preparing for Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization
Is your agency prepared for the transition to post-quantum cryptography?
https://t.co/wDPoRlhA3S
Thursday's free webinar: the EU's end-2026 PQC checkpoint.
If 'initial planning and first pilots by the end of 2026' is on your to-do list, come along. We'll show what counts as each, and how to present it to NIS2 and DORA supervisors.
What we'll go through:
• What the EU expects by the end of 2026, by 2030 and by 2035
• What counts as initial planning, asset identification and a first pilot
• How to match your evidence to NIS2 and DORA supervisory requests
• What national authorities such as Germany's BSI add to the roadmap, starting with hybrid recommendations
Thursday, November 12, 13:00 UTC (14:00 Brussels). Still time to register: https://t.co/nhUDijnhP1
GOOGLE, MICROSOFT AND NVIDIA WROTE THE LIST OF WHAT QUANTUM COMPUTERS ARE ACTUALLY GOOD FOR
20 researchers from Google Quantum AI, Microsoft, Nvidia, and JPMorgan released a 70-page catalog of every KNOWN problem where a quantum computer should crush a normal one.
Their bar is brutal. Twice as fast doesn’t count. Even turning a million steps into a thousand didn’t make the cut, because error correction eats that gain in real life.
What did make it:
Breaking today’s encryption.
Simulating molecules and materials, the road to new drugs, batteries and fertilizers.
Solving giant systems of equations, the math behind engineering and physics simulations, which could unlock more opportunities than we can imagine.
Pulling hidden patterns out of noisy data.
Certain hard optimization problems.
The catch they spell out: a huge speedup on paper can still vanish once you count loading the data, reading out the answer and correcting errors.
So the question isn’t whether quantum will be useful. It’s which of these lands first.
$INFQ $IONQ $GOOGL $IBM
@Zalan2465@QRLedger Why is QRL 2.0 switching to the lattice-based ML-DSA (Dilithium) and moving to Proof of Stake (PoS)? What problems did QRL encounter with XMSS?
@Zalan2465@QRLedger Why is QRL 2.0 switching to the lattice-based ML-DSA (Dilithium) and moving to Proof of Stake (PoS)? What problems did QRL encounter with XMSS?
Next steps in preparing for post-quantum cryptography
Hash-based signatures
Hash-based signatures such as SLH-DSA, LMS and XMSS rely on different security assumptions than ML-DSA. They are not suitable for general purpose use as the signatures are large and the algorithms are much slower than ML-DSA. However, these algorithms may be a good fit for use cases such as signing firmware and software where speed is not a bottleneck.
For LMS and XMSS, the security of these algorithms critically depends on users correctly managing the state (that is, knowing which one-time keys have been used for signing so it can be guaranteed that they are never used again). Cases where state management is a more tractable problem include firmware and software signing. ETSI have created advice on how to do this in their Technical Report TR 103 692 v1.1.1. LMSand XMSS should only be used in situations where it is possible to manage state in a trusted manner for the lifetime of the signing key.
SLH-DSA provides a more robust alternative for situations where it may be difficult or impossible to guarantee a one-time key is not re-used, as state management is not straightforward and mistakes can be detrimental to security. This increased robustness comes with significantly larger signature sizes and greater signing time than either LMS or XMSS, although the verification performance is similar.
LINK: https://t.co/MXc5f2NXI8
400 times the age of the universe. That’s how long today’s best supercomputers would need to factor a 2048-bit number 🔐
Then, in 1994, Peter Shor showed a quantum computer could do it efficiently, given a sufficiently large quantum computer.
Since then, the question has been how large. In our new paper, we estimate about 25,000 cat qubits could run it in about 3 days.
Dahmun Goudarzi and Vivien Londe, two of the researchers behind the paper, take you from the maths that keeps your passwords safe to the cat qubits that could change the picture. 🐈
📄 Read the paper: https://t.co/aQgOBbogyI
📝 Read the blog post: https://t.co/43JwqPx7nW
One day, you might blush and change your mind, saying that ML-DSA (Dilithium) is more suitable for Bitcoin than SPHINCS+ (SLH-DSA) as a quantum-resistant algorithm. 😝 (Though ML-DSA (Dilithium) isn’t all that suitable either.) #Bitcoin#NIST#Quantum