queenalyssa

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

FOR AUTHORITIES INCLUDING @FBIDirectorKash and anyone pursuing @slingoorio civilly or criminally, and requiring an identity confirmation. None of the following information identifies him directly, does not place him in harms way, and is part of the public record.

At 16:58 UTC on 8 November 2026, the wallet linked to https://t.co/69iSw7MUMz’s slingoor profile sold 620.44 million Big Titty Coin tokens in 42 seconds, taking its tracked balance to zero. It received 2,810.114 SOL net, roughly US$250,000.

The three sales
1. https://t.co/OqcfWTIpvN
2. https://t.co/yAF4SWL57C
3. https://t.co/Jypq24Iptw

The later 689,273 USDC conversion used a mixed SOL balance that included proceeds from other token sales.
1. https://t.co/I4vXfu5CGt

THE BINANCE LEAD

At 04:18:40 UTC on 1 September, an address Solscan labels “Binance 2” sent 0.050465 SOL to the original deployer in a batch. On launch day, that deployer sent 230 million tokens to the selling wallet.
1. https://t.co/0b74LDvNY9
2. https://t.co/OoeBOxnEDM

Please ask @binance to preserve the records for that exact 0.050465 SOL payment and determine whether it maps to a customer withdrawal. The records lead concerns the deployer. Who controlled each wallet remains open.
https://t.co/4V1M67T5VS

@a1lon9 @json1444 who your offices would be very familiar with, should be pursued for any & all access logs on the https://t.co/Jn46ylM4gC app to corroborate his direct facilitation of those sales. I imagine he’s already identified anyway.

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

My kind friend, the objective was to bring the transactional evidence to the attention of the authorities and establish a public record. I wasn’t attempting to produce a comprehensive legal analysis, nor was one necessary for that purpose.

Kash Patel and his office don’t need me to identify the applicable statutes or explain the legal avenues available to them. They know it very well. That’s their area of expertise. What they need are the transaction records from which to examine the conduct, trace the funds and determine whether criminal offences have occurred.

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

A poorly constructed shill-driven argument that falls flat on the face of the law.

The SEC staff expressly says fraud in meme-coin sales can be prosecuted.

https://t.co/eiocrvvPar

@slingoorio made the link between his supply and people’s willingness to buy himself. On 5 October, he asked whether putting his stake in a multisig would make people “more willing to bid this.” He’d already written “I will never sell this” on 22 September. On 27 October, he told holders he’d reward them by “buying back and never selling.”

Less than four hours before the sell off, at 13:19 UTC on 8 November, he was still urging people to buy the dip. A buyer assessing the risk of a sell-off has every reason to care whether the holder of roughly 60% intends to hold or liquidate. Slingoor’s own question shows he understood that.

https://t.co/4CHhkas4pE
https://t.co/RydlcarfK8
https://t.co/SRpRTAePHa
https://t.co/2peQyVvg7f

Three hours and 38 minutes after that last callout, the linked wallet began selling. Three signed swaps moved 620.44 million tokens in 42 seconds and increased its balance by 2,810.114 SOL net.

https://t.co/OqcfWTIpvN
https://t.co/yAF4SWL57C
https://t.co/Jypq24Iptw

Section 1343 reaches an intentional scheme to obtain money through a materially false promise. The promise at issue concerned his own stake and whether he intended to sell it. The callouts establish what he told buyers. The signatures establish what the wallet did. The legal issue centrally reserved for his day in court is when he decided to liquidate, and whether he was already planning the exit while telling people to buy. Those answers may seem obvious to most already, but it’s for a judge or a jury to adjudicate, how about that.

https://t.co/EMFm41zuXe

[Midnight Hog 🌒 @CryptoHog6]

@queenalysoor @FBIDirectorKash @slingoorio So much effort to produce zero ecidence. You know selling itself is not illegal, right? You need to prove actual manipulation, promises of gains etc... so your transaction logs means nothing here. And tagging FBI with this 🤣🤣🤣

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

@theunipcs Nobody’s believing this rubbish anymore bros.

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

@0xTerrorGhost_ @FBIDirectorKash @slingoorio Once again, I didn’t buy a cent. Your poor attempt at dick-riding @slingoorio hoping that he might give you a few crumbs back of whatever he’s scammed you of, is pathetic as much as it is ambitious.

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

@0xTerrorGhost_ @FBIDirectorKash @slingoorio Once again, I didn’t buy a cent. Your poor attempt at dick-riding @slingoorio hoping that he might give you a few crumbs back of whatever he’s scammed you of, is pathetic as much as it is ambitious.

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

FOR AUTHORITIES INCLUDING @FBIDirectorKash and anyone pursuing @slingoorio civilly or criminally, and requiring an identity confirmation. None of the following information identifies him directly, does not place him in harms way, and is part of the public record.

At 16:58 UTC on 8 November 2026, the wallet linked to https://t.co/69iSw7MUMz’s slingoor profile sold 620.44 million Big Titty Coin tokens in 42 seconds, taking its tracked balance to zero. It received 2,810.114 SOL net, roughly US$250,000.

The three sales
1. https://t.co/OqcfWTIpvN
2. https://t.co/yAF4SWL57C
3. https://t.co/Jypq24Iptw

The later 689,273 USDC conversion used a mixed SOL balance that included proceeds from other token sales.
1. https://t.co/I4vXfu5CGt

THE BINANCE LEAD

At 04:18:40 UTC on 1 September, an address Solscan labels “Binance 2” sent 0.050465 SOL to the original deployer in a batch. On launch day, that deployer sent 230 million tokens to the selling wallet.
1. https://t.co/0b74LDvNY9
2. https://t.co/OoeBOxnEDM

Please ask @binance to preserve the records for that exact 0.050465 SOL payment and determine whether it maps to a customer withdrawal. The records lead concerns the deployer. Who controlled each wallet remains open.
https://t.co/4V1M67T5VS

@a1lon9 @json1444 who your offices would be very familiar with, should be pursued for any & all access logs on the https://t.co/Jn46ylM4gC app to corroborate his direct facilitation of those sales. I imagine he’s already identified anyway.

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

@badattrading_ They’re worried about much more than the IRS.

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

Didn’t buy a single cent, no. But I’d challenge your assumption.

Telling victims they should’ve known better holds them to a higher standard of sophistication than those exploiting their ignorance.

There’s a big diff. between accepting the risks of speculation and being deliberately deceived. The latter carries serious legal consequences and the applicable statutory framework to the @slingoorio case has already been explained repeatedly.

More broadly, this every-man-for-himself mentality is self-defeating. Brutally irrational to expect to profit from the trust of others while treating their systematic exploitation on say, @pumpfun as fair game.

You’re ultimately legitimising the conduct that undermines the conditions for your own success ahh.

[GW IS NOT REAL @5fakb48]

@queenalysoor @FBIDirectorKash @slingoorio Ok so.

You purchased

**Checks notes**

Big titty coin ( btc ) - a memecoin, which a notorious bundler bought

Your surprised at any of this? You should have expected to lose everything.

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

@TairinBtc @FBIDirectorKash @slingoorio Once again, demonstrably incorrect. Repeating this doesn’t give it any additional merit. See numerous posts made on this issue, latest https://t.co/pC3DbR2cVm

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

A poorly constructed shill-driven argument that falls flat on the face of the law.

The SEC staff expressly says fraud in meme-coin sales can be prosecuted.

https://t.co/eiocrvvPar

@slingoorio made the link between his supply and people’s willingness to buy himself. On 5 October, he asked whether putting his stake in a multisig would make people “more willing to bid this.” He’d already written “I will never sell this” on 22 September. On 27 October, he told holders he’d reward them by “buying back and never selling.”

Less than four hours before the sell off, at 13:19 UTC on 8 November, he was still urging people to buy the dip. A buyer assessing the risk of a sell-off has every reason to care whether the holder of roughly 60% intends to hold or liquidate. Slingoor’s own question shows he understood that.

https://t.co/4CHhkas4pE
https://t.co/RydlcarfK8
https://t.co/SRpRTAePHa
https://t.co/2peQyVvg7f

Three hours and 38 minutes after that last callout, the linked wallet began selling. Three signed swaps moved 620.44 million tokens in 42 seconds and increased its balance by 2,810.114 SOL net.

https://t.co/OqcfWTIpvN
https://t.co/yAF4SWL57C
https://t.co/Jypq24Iptw

Section 1343 reaches an intentional scheme to obtain money through a materially false promise. The promise at issue concerned his own stake and whether he intended to sell it. The callouts establish what he told buyers. The signatures establish what the wallet did. The legal issue centrally reserved for his day in court is when he decided to liquidate, and whether he was already planning the exit while telling people to buy. Those answers may seem obvious to most already, but it’s for a judge or a jury to adjudicate, how about that.

https://t.co/EMFm41zuXe

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

I’ve addressed this several times on my other posts; go look at them for the precise statutory framework. Your statement is simply erroneous and simply refuted.

Read the part of the SEC statement you left out. It expressly says fraud in meme-coin sales can be prosecuted. https://t.co/eiocrvvPar

A sell order can be the final step in a fraud. If a promoter told buyers his holdings were locked while keeping them available to sell, or promised to hold while already planning to liquidate, investigators can test what he knew when he made those claims. A scheme to obtain buyers’ money through material lies can be federal wire fraud when interstate or foreign wires are used to carry it out. https://t.co/EMFm41zuXe

Prosecutions are ramping up rapidly on this issue.

For example; The Mutant Ape Planet developer pleaded guilty to wire-fraud conspiracy for defrauding buyers of digital collectibles. https://t.co/ym9B3adVFN

[Dysgenick @dysgenick]

@queenalysoor @FBIDirectorKash @slingoorio people saying “there’s no crime” are retarded
the feds love free good PR

if people make enough noise and offer this abject filth of a human being @slingoorio to them on a silver platter, they’ll 1000% go after him and seize his €, add it to their pension

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

I can’t legally condemn him before his day in court but it would appear that his conduct is very illegal. See the statutes referenced at the bottom of the other post too.

The only query is if @slingoorio is a US citizen. That appears to be so, based on public knowledge. Very unlucky for him.

There’s a large difference between being the president of the US, having political connections to the apex and being a powerless nobody like @slingoorio . Even Trumps court issues dissipated entirely naturally when he became president.

Sling is an otherwise timid, professionally obscure internet nobody, who’s greatest networking achievement was having @a1lon9 put him on the callout rewards payroll for @Pumpfun. The @dojphofficial and the @fbi have made a point in recent months to prosecute cryptocurrency scams to the fullest extent of the law. Note a further example someone posted of a meme rugger who recently got charged too.

Some statutory examples:

WIRE FRAUD, 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Were buyers induced to part with money or property through an intentional scheme involving material deception, and were interstate or foreign wires used to carry it out? Preserve any dated statements about holdings, intended sales or liquidity and compare them with the wallet activity.

https://t.co/eiTFD3RNF9…

COMMODITY FRAUD AND MANIPULATION, 7 U.S.C. § 9(1) and (3), 7 U.S.C. § 13(a)(2), and 17 C.F.R. §§ 180.1 and 180.2. If the trades fall within the Commodity Exchange Act, investigators can test for intentional or reckless deception. A completed price-manipulation case would require evidence of the ability to influence price, specific intent to create an artificial price, and proof that the conduct caused that price.

https://t.co/eiTFD3RNF9…
https://t.co/eiTFD3RNF9…
https://t.co/eolL3smk97…

SECURITIES FRAUD, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. This theory requires a qualifying securities transaction. Under Howey and the SEC’s March 2026 interpretation, the relevant question is whether the terms and promotion of the offering created an investment contract, including a reasonable expectation of profit from the promoter’s essential managerial efforts.

https://t.co/eiTFD3RNF9…
https://t.co/eolL3smk97…
https://t.co/PvT64K5Isz…
https://t.co/fqKfKIGxWE…

[Papa Kayo @Papakayo13]

@queenalysoor @FBIDirectorKash @slingoorio Is it even illegal to do this in the US? He pressed the sell button. I mean your president did it lmao. Not saying it's morally right, but genuinely is it illegal to rug a memecoin?

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

Please see this latest post with urgency particularly the API comment https://t.co/GIp1v5VJZT

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

@slingoorio | 30-DAY ON-CHAIN FINANCIAL RECORD

@fbi @FBIDirectorKash @secgov

The Solana ledger identifies transactions to verify and exchange records to request. The review covers 10 October to 8 November 2026 UTC, plus a post-sale trace, and may assist holders seeking civil redress.

There are significant concerns around the subject’s safety and security. I have been prudent to ensure that this information is solely a matter of verifiable cryptographic public record.

1 | REWARDS

353,884.098841 USDC in 30 https://t.co/69iSw7MUMz Callout Rewards, reconciled to on-chain receipts.
US$6,670.82 in bonding-curve creator fees.
US$14,327.10 in AMM creator fees.

The main wallet received approximately US$374,882.02, including creator fees at indexed USD values.

@pumpfun @a1lon9 @json1444, please preserve the original Big Titty Coin callouts, compensation and token allocation disclosures, and payout records. Any question of criminal culpability on https://t.co/69iSw7MUMz’s part would require a separate, independent investigation.

https://t.co/cGal2xwUwa

2 | USDC MOVEMENT

Across 8,368 transfer entries, the main wallet recorded 1,897,254.45 USDC in and 1,254,731.93 USDC out. Net debits by transaction totalled 725,928.03 USDC, including trades and fees.

https://t.co/DH7H5Iff6Q

After the sell-off, a mixed SOL balance was swapped for 689,273.41 USDC. By 01:49 UTC on 9 November, the wallet had spent 206,801.25 USDC on swaps, including 102,200.26 USDC buying back the original Big Titty Coin mint, and held 490,716.89 USDC.

https://t.co/I4vXfu5CGt
https://t.co/Plf3M7D9c0

3 | EXCHANGE RECORDS

BINANCE, 20 OCTOBER. The LMAO! deployer sent 14 SOL. Three seconds later, 13.999995 SOL was forwarded to an address that then made a pooled sweep into Binance 2, wallet 5tzFkiKscXHK5ZXCGbXZxdw7gTjjD1mBwuoFbhUvuAi9.

https://t.co/5XbNRYEboi
https://t.co/EKKZbnYpTm
https://t.co/RZH8exIoqS

COINBASE, 29 OCTOBER. The main wallet sent 10,574.61 USDC to Abd31F2bmBebzRQDBm7zuqz21xNqykWDZnbQ3Dq2bdi5. The exact amount moved through two further hops before the receiving wallet made a pooled sweep to a Coinbase-labelled hot wallet.

https://t.co/LwqkyCl5wp
https://t.co/U59uZyzDd4
https://t.co/EpquUSFo3v
https://t.co/AYbDEg0FO1

KUCOIN, 22–28 OCTOBER. A KuCoin-labelled hot wallet sent 102.611766 SOL directly to the main wallet across three transfers.

https://t.co/vjSSFDsYID
https://t.co/v9LV7uMKbL
https://t.co/fD0Sy9vdCz

All three leads predate the sell-off. Request matching Binance and Coinbase deposit credits and the originating KuCoin withdrawal records.

4 | POTENTIAL U.S. STATUTES FOR REVIEW

The U.S. jurisdictional connection remains to be established.

WIRE FRAUD, 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Were buyers induced to part with money or property through an intentional scheme involving material deception, and were interstate or foreign wires used to carry it out? Preserve any dated statements about holdings, intended sales or liquidity and compare them with the wallet activity.

https://t.co/nbv23dnhKd

COMMODITY FRAUD AND MANIPULATION, 7 U.S.C. § 9(1) and (3), 7 U.S.C. § 13(a)(2), and 17 C.F.R. §§ 180.1 and 180.2. If the trades fall within the Commodity Exchange Act, investigators can test for intentional or reckless deception. A completed price-manipulation case would require evidence of the ability to influence price, specific intent to create an artificial price, and proof that the conduct caused that price.

https://t.co/yOmsK17RZc
https://t.co/vZoTdTiF11
https://t.co/coqVXbUDJq

SECURITIES FRAUD, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. This theory requires a qualifying securities transaction. Under Howey and the SEC’s March 2026 interpretation, the relevant question is whether the terms and promotion of the offering created an investment contract, including a reasonable expectation of profit from the promoter’s essential managerial efforts.

https://t.co/c1R087ZJD8
https://t.co/XocQMeidWO
https://t.co/8KrRbw1TOt
https://t.co/U5FEDNt82Y

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

@slingoorio knows. Thats why he deleted all his followers to clean his posts before bringing his X back. Unlucky for him, I have the entire 150,000 post archive too.

You made your bed. Now lie in it. Make sure you read the quoted post below and preserve the API https://t.co/Jn46ylM4gC details especially if you are a victim and law enforcement has been flagged and they are on it.

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

@slingoorio knows. Thats why he deleted all his followers to clean his posts before bringing his X back. Unlucky for him, I have the entire 150,000 post archive too.

You made your bed. Now lie in it. Make sure you read the quoted post below and preserve the API https://t.co/Jn46ylM4gC details especially if you are a victim and law enforcement has been flagged and they are on it.

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

@slingoorio | 30-DAY ON-CHAIN FINANCIAL RECORD

@fbi @FBIDirectorKash @secgov

The Solana ledger identifies transactions to verify and exchange records to request. The review covers 10 October to 8 November 2026 UTC, plus a post-sale trace, and may assist holders seeking civil redress.

There are significant concerns around the subject’s safety and security. I have been prudent to ensure that this information is solely a matter of verifiable cryptographic public record.

1 | REWARDS

353,884.098841 USDC in 30 https://t.co/69iSw7MUMz Callout Rewards, reconciled to on-chain receipts.
US$6,670.82 in bonding-curve creator fees.
US$14,327.10 in AMM creator fees.

The main wallet received approximately US$374,882.02, including creator fees at indexed USD values.

@pumpfun @a1lon9 @json1444, please preserve the original Big Titty Coin callouts, compensation and token allocation disclosures, and payout records. Any question of criminal culpability on https://t.co/69iSw7MUMz’s part would require a separate, independent investigation.

https://t.co/cGal2xwUwa

2 | USDC MOVEMENT

Across 8,368 transfer entries, the main wallet recorded 1,897,254.45 USDC in and 1,254,731.93 USDC out. Net debits by transaction totalled 725,928.03 USDC, including trades and fees.

https://t.co/DH7H5Iff6Q

After the sell-off, a mixed SOL balance was swapped for 689,273.41 USDC. By 01:49 UTC on 9 November, the wallet had spent 206,801.25 USDC on swaps, including 102,200.26 USDC buying back the original Big Titty Coin mint, and held 490,716.89 USDC.

https://t.co/I4vXfu5CGt
https://t.co/Plf3M7D9c0

3 | EXCHANGE RECORDS

BINANCE, 20 OCTOBER. The LMAO! deployer sent 14 SOL. Three seconds later, 13.999995 SOL was forwarded to an address that then made a pooled sweep into Binance 2, wallet 5tzFkiKscXHK5ZXCGbXZxdw7gTjjD1mBwuoFbhUvuAi9.

https://t.co/5XbNRYEboi
https://t.co/EKKZbnYpTm
https://t.co/RZH8exIoqS

COINBASE, 29 OCTOBER. The main wallet sent 10,574.61 USDC to Abd31F2bmBebzRQDBm7zuqz21xNqykWDZnbQ3Dq2bdi5. The exact amount moved through two further hops before the receiving wallet made a pooled sweep to a Coinbase-labelled hot wallet.

https://t.co/LwqkyCl5wp
https://t.co/U59uZyzDd4
https://t.co/EpquUSFo3v
https://t.co/AYbDEg0FO1

KUCOIN, 22–28 OCTOBER. A KuCoin-labelled hot wallet sent 102.611766 SOL directly to the main wallet across three transfers.

https://t.co/vjSSFDsYID
https://t.co/v9LV7uMKbL
https://t.co/fD0Sy9vdCz

All three leads predate the sell-off. Request matching Binance and Coinbase deposit credits and the originating KuCoin withdrawal records.

4 | POTENTIAL U.S. STATUTES FOR REVIEW

The U.S. jurisdictional connection remains to be established.

WIRE FRAUD, 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Were buyers induced to part with money or property through an intentional scheme involving material deception, and were interstate or foreign wires used to carry it out? Preserve any dated statements about holdings, intended sales or liquidity and compare them with the wallet activity.

https://t.co/nbv23dnhKd

COMMODITY FRAUD AND MANIPULATION, 7 U.S.C. § 9(1) and (3), 7 U.S.C. § 13(a)(2), and 17 C.F.R. §§ 180.1 and 180.2. If the trades fall within the Commodity Exchange Act, investigators can test for intentional or reckless deception. A completed price-manipulation case would require evidence of the ability to influence price, specific intent to create an artificial price, and proof that the conduct caused that price.

https://t.co/yOmsK17RZc
https://t.co/vZoTdTiF11
https://t.co/coqVXbUDJq

SECURITIES FRAUD, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. This theory requires a qualifying securities transaction. Under Howey and the SEC’s March 2026 interpretation, the relevant question is whether the terms and promotion of the offering created an investment contract, including a reasonable expectation of profit from the promoter’s essential managerial efforts.

https://t.co/c1R087ZJD8
https://t.co/XocQMeidWO
https://t.co/8KrRbw1TOt
https://t.co/U5FEDNt82Y

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

They’re trying to delete these posts. Please preserve them. Please preserve all the evidence. They got the other one deleted.

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

@slingoorio | 30-DAY ON-CHAIN FINANCIAL RECORD

@fbi @FBIDirectorKash @secgov

The Solana ledger identifies transactions to verify and exchange records to request. The review covers 10 October to 8 November 2026 UTC, plus a post-sale trace, and may assist holders seeking civil redress.

There are significant concerns around the subject’s safety and security. I have been prudent to ensure that this information is solely a matter of verifiable cryptographic public record.

1 | REWARDS

353,884.098841 USDC in 30 https://t.co/69iSw7MUMz Callout Rewards, reconciled to on-chain receipts.
US$6,670.82 in bonding-curve creator fees.
US$14,327.10 in AMM creator fees.

The main wallet received approximately US$374,882.02, including creator fees at indexed USD values.

@pumpfun @a1lon9 @json1444, please preserve the original Big Titty Coin callouts, compensation and token allocation disclosures, and payout records. Any question of criminal culpability on https://t.co/69iSw7MUMz’s part would require a separate, independent investigation.

https://t.co/cGal2xwUwa

2 | USDC MOVEMENT

Across 8,368 transfer entries, the main wallet recorded 1,897,254.45 USDC in and 1,254,731.93 USDC out. Net debits by transaction totalled 725,928.03 USDC, including trades and fees.

https://t.co/DH7H5Iff6Q

After the sell-off, a mixed SOL balance was swapped for 689,273.41 USDC. By 01:49 UTC on 9 November, the wallet had spent 206,801.25 USDC on swaps, including 102,200.26 USDC buying back the original Big Titty Coin mint, and held 490,716.89 USDC.

https://t.co/I4vXfu5CGt
https://t.co/Plf3M7D9c0

3 | EXCHANGE RECORDS

BINANCE, 20 OCTOBER. The LMAO! deployer sent 14 SOL. Three seconds later, 13.999995 SOL was forwarded to an address that then made a pooled sweep into Binance 2, wallet 5tzFkiKscXHK5ZXCGbXZxdw7gTjjD1mBwuoFbhUvuAi9.

https://t.co/5XbNRYEboi
https://t.co/EKKZbnYpTm
https://t.co/RZH8exIoqS

COINBASE, 29 OCTOBER. The main wallet sent 10,574.61 USDC to Abd31F2bmBebzRQDBm7zuqz21xNqykWDZnbQ3Dq2bdi5. The exact amount moved through two further hops before the receiving wallet made a pooled sweep to a Coinbase-labelled hot wallet.

https://t.co/LwqkyCl5wp
https://t.co/U59uZyzDd4
https://t.co/EpquUSFo3v
https://t.co/AYbDEg0FO1

KUCOIN, 22–28 OCTOBER. A KuCoin-labelled hot wallet sent 102.611766 SOL directly to the main wallet across three transfers.

https://t.co/vjSSFDsYID
https://t.co/v9LV7uMKbL
https://t.co/fD0Sy9vdCz

All three leads predate the sell-off. Request matching Binance and Coinbase deposit credits and the originating KuCoin withdrawal records.

4 | POTENTIAL U.S. STATUTES FOR REVIEW

The U.S. jurisdictional connection remains to be established.

WIRE FRAUD, 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Were buyers induced to part with money or property through an intentional scheme involving material deception, and were interstate or foreign wires used to carry it out? Preserve any dated statements about holdings, intended sales or liquidity and compare them with the wallet activity.

https://t.co/nbv23dnhKd

COMMODITY FRAUD AND MANIPULATION, 7 U.S.C. § 9(1) and (3), 7 U.S.C. § 13(a)(2), and 17 C.F.R. §§ 180.1 and 180.2. If the trades fall within the Commodity Exchange Act, investigators can test for intentional or reckless deception. A completed price-manipulation case would require evidence of the ability to influence price, specific intent to create an artificial price, and proof that the conduct caused that price.

https://t.co/yOmsK17RZc
https://t.co/vZoTdTiF11
https://t.co/coqVXbUDJq

SECURITIES FRAUD, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. This theory requires a qualifying securities transaction. Under Howey and the SEC’s March 2026 interpretation, the relevant question is whether the terms and promotion of the offering created an investment contract, including a reasonable expectation of profit from the promoter’s essential managerial efforts.

https://t.co/c1R087ZJD8
https://t.co/XocQMeidWO
https://t.co/8KrRbw1TOt
https://t.co/U5FEDNt82Y

[queenalyssa @queenalysoor]

BIG TITTY COIN ($BTC) | PRESERVE THE EVIDENCE

The trades and transfers are fixed in Solana’s finalised ledger. @pumpfun controls what its API continues to make public. Those records show what @slingoorio told buyers, what https://t.co/69iSw7MUMz paid him and what it publicly disclosed about those payments. All three matter to any investigation of their conduct.

I’ve preserved the raw JSON with UTC timestamps and SHA-256 checksums. If you lost money or intend to put this before investigators or a court, save your own copy now.

1 | CALLOUT REWARDS (ACCOUNT-WIDE)
Rolling month, 353,884.10 USDC https://t.co/cGal2xwUwa
Lifetime, 643,411.95 USDC https://t.co/KsaiuU4SSm

2 | BIG TITTY COIN THREAD
Original callout https://t.co/wz0nciLCJn
Author updates, page 1 https://t.co/fo0NGibQex
Author updates, page 2 https://t.co/NnNn9nteLt

3 | PROFILE AND ACTIVITY (ACCOUNT-WIDE)
Profile https://t.co/2LkNwEfM01
Callout performance https://t.co/svYznAt7jZ
Replies and quotes https://t.co/PnrY5zat8t
Reposts and quotes https://t.co/jyMTeG969C