RadiantSad

Trans woman
Pronouns: She/her
Doing my best to live as my true self in a world that doesn't understand me.
Please #BeKind

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@Jacob_P_Gould @reubensilby It doesn't take an ideological position to simply acknowledge reality. You are amongst the people twisting reality to fit a preferred ideological position.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@HPluckrose Then I apologize.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@HPluckrose If I'm mistaken or misunderstood then I'm happy to say I was wrong.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@HPluckrose I said you I thought you were being dishonest in this instance. We are all dishonest at one point or another, including me. Block me if you like but there isn't anything wrong with questioning a persons framing of a position.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@HPluckrose You are unaware that she went further than simply saying the person in question is female coded?

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@AmericasCousin And yet you will of and will again express your opinion on what language people should use, and you should be able to. And the people who you express these opinions to should be able to do as they wish in response to it.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@jk_rowling @donotwobble @surreykiwi @tonymc39 @theglassfish13 No one is policing your language. That is hyperbolic nonsense. People can be critical of the choices you make just as you are critical of others. You can choose to do what you will with the criticism just as anyone else can.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@MattisRedacted The requirement to be at school has nothing to do with needing to eat food. It would only logically make sense if being at school introduced the need to eat food whereas not being at school meant you didn't need to eat food.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@HabCorpLinguist @goatpurple1 There's no such thing as objectively reasonable.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@SteveMcRae_ You can categorize all unbelief as a belief if you want, but that's playing dumb language games and not addressing the substance.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@EveKeneinan No one owes anyone anything when it comes to their emotional investment in mythological nonsense. If it upsets you then that's entirely your problem.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@Legal_Fil Why are you bringing up the rule of law when it isn't being critiqued by the OP? He's critiquing a particular law.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@charlescwcooke The rule of law just as easily erodes freedoms. Why do you think invoking the concept of the rule of law is somehow a substitute for arguing the merits of any particular law?

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@soniasodha What other group of people who wish to be regarded as if they are something they provably are not are we not allowed to discriminate against? The details and reasoning behind an act of discrimination matter.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@runthinkwrite @NathanMoorborn @FondOfBeetles You are of course free to entertain those beliefs or those who hold said beliefs in any which way you choose, but at least own what you are doing.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@runthinkwrite @NathanMoorborn @FondOfBeetles It is that easy and you know it. You, like everyone else, refers to every other sexed animal by the pronouns that communicate its sex. The only instance of not using pronouns this way in the English language is to entertain a particular belief system.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@GirlGirl124525 @JustMisogyny Same way as you present as anything else you aren't. They simply don't want to use clear language to refer to a disguise/imitation as what it is or the fantasy/delusion the imitation serves.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@Uggg @SwipeWright Yes you can have variation within either state, this has been covered countless times and yet you persevere. You have the answers you simply won't accept them.

[RadiantSad @RadiantSad]

@bitcloud It's not a lie. I'm sure you understand what the words mean and how to apply them so why make an argument from a position you know is false? Simply stroking your own ego? Bait?