Tim Raettig

PostDoc @Uni_WUE | #rstats | #DataScience | #psychology

[Tim Raettig @RaettigTim]

New paper out @APA_Journals: we investigated the mechanisms causing dual-action benefits (in contrast to the more commonly observed costs). Our results point to two sources: differential inhibitory costs and semantic redundancy gains.

https://t.co/40PkIQaPAZ

[Tim Raettig @RaettigTim]

@Prolific Hey Prolific, I am trying to get in touch with researcher support, but cannot reach the help center due to an error (SSL_ERROR_NO_CYPHER_OVERLAP). This happens on all my browsers and devices. Please help!

[Anne Böckler-Raettig @AnneBockler]

Thanks to @goetheinstitut for the great symposium on trust! Here's my talk for those interested :) https://t.co/WcpzHzBSL3

[Anne Böckler-Raettig @AnneBockler]

Gaze and face information interact when catching our attention. Thanks for the great collaboration @BreilChristina @DerRobrecht @DrTimWelsh Roxana Pittig and @RaettigTim!

[Tim Raettig @RaettigTim]

Really interesting read if - like me - you only have a vague concept of how (viral) evolution works & affects things like transmissibility

[T. Ryan Gregory 🇨🇦 @TRyanGregory]

Evolution 101. 🧵

Mutations occur as chance errors in replication. They're just mistakes in copying. Most have no effect. Some are detrimental to the organism (or virus), a few may happen to be beneficial -- this depends on the environment.

[Ewan Birney @ewanbirney]

Omicron thoughts from dark, Christmas London. TL;DR - Europe+World is facing the Omicron storm and it looks increasingly bad; and, obviously, the virus doesn't care about Christmas. Despite some serious response in the UK, this virus is replicating fast; more action likely needed

[Basil Wahn @BasilWahn]

Beware: If you keep doing research long enough, your stimuli start to look like you. ;-) New publication with Laura Schmitz, Alan Kingstone, & @AnneBockler: "When eyes beat lips: Speaker gaze affects audiovisual integration in the McGurk illusion" https://t.co/KaxTZzsQbN

[Tim Raettig @RaettigTim]

@sTeamTraen Well, it's better than HauPrzFrvudUmmPemRi, I guess...

[Tim Raettig @RaettigTim]

@elhotzo Doch sicher, der Markt regelt das schon 🤭

[Tim Raettig @RaettigTim]

@vascobrazao What is this "Facebook" you speak of

[Tim Raettig @RaettigTim]

@ChrisPolPsych @Xiaowen__Xu @NeilLewisJr @spicy_thai @Sakiera_Hudson did not know the word "chucklefuck". very appropriately, it will now forever be associated with Schimmack for me.

[Tim Raettig @RaettigTim]

@wgervais That man has some serious personal problems...

[Tim Raettig @RaettigTim]

trying with "superpower" right now, but not seeing it...

[Tim Raettig @RaettigTim]

Dear #rstats community: how do you perform G*Power-esque sensitivity analyses, given multiple within-subj factors and interactions?

[Tim Raettig @RaettigTim]

@i_evangelidis btw I would highly recommend using a package like "ez" for convenience 🙃

[Tim Raettig @RaettigTim]

@i_evangelidis Hi, "factor" doesn't check if something is a factor (that would be ("is.factor"), so it's possible Appeal_type is not a factor in the dataframe.

[Tim Raettig @RaettigTim]

@dingstweets Spot-on. Thank you for this!

[Sebastian Deterding @dingstweets]

This tweet has been making the rounds as an example of open science proponents piling on female ECRs (the lead author of the paper). The most noteworthy thing about that discourse is how no noteworthy open science proponent who engaged, engaged the actual issue. 🧵