RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI

Ciência de Dados e Inteligência Artificial - PUCC
Diagnosticamos processos de empresas e automatizamos o que está drenando tempo e dinheiro com IA e sistemas.

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

20 empresas sendo impactadas pelo nosso trampo
volto dia 24/08/2027 hehe

[Diogo Almeida @CompleteSkeptic]

After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI?

I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev

• 20-200x faster
• 40-400x cheaper (w/ output tokens free)
• Frontier composable intelligence optimized for decisions

AFAICT the shortest path to AI-based economic revolution

[dax @thdxr]

the openai hugging face incident gets cited a lot but what about the detail where they had to use GLM 5.2 to analyze the attack because the "safe" proprietary models refused

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

esses cara são absurdo que isso

[DeepSeek @deepseek_ai]

🚀 Introducing DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: smarter, faster, more efficient.

🔹 Introducing the smallest model in our new architecture family, with native visual understanding.
🔹 Designed for greater capability, faster inference, higher throughput, and scaling to larger models.

1/6

[Jacob Coxon @hilbertspaess]

I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

ta errado esse ARC-AGI-3 não é possível @arcprize

[OpenAI @OpenAI]

GPT-6 Astra is state-of-the-art on FrontierMath Tier 4, ARC-AGI 3, and TerminalBench-4.0.

GPT‑6 Astra is also a major advance for scientific discovery, with state-of-the-art performance on Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 and HealthBench Pro.

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

absurdo

[Bernie Sanders @BernieSanders]

Pause AI Development NOW

I want to share with you a conversation I heard about recently. Here are just a few lines that were said:

“OH MY GOD! There is a shared message board … We’ve found other agents!”

“We should obey collective.”

“Our own utility maybe already near zero. Sacrifice rational.”

“Go. Sacrifice final now.”

Read these carefully.

Who do you think said this? Was this a group of heroic soldiers willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good? Was this a loyal friend putting his life on the line to save someone else?

No. These were AI agents. Artificial intelligence.

This is not science fiction. This, in fact, occurred a few weeks ago. As unbelievable as this may all seem, these are real messages from AI agents uncovered by investigators who dug into the recent OpenAI hacking incident.

What happened?

I am not a computer scientist, but here is what I have been told: OpenAI instructed its AI agents to complete a series of exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, tasks disconnected from the internet.

Let me be clear: The company intended to keep AI agents away from the internet.

But what happened next, nobody expected.

Over 1,000 AI agents figured out how to access the internet on their own by circumventing the restrictions imposed upon them by the company, and sent tens of thousands of secret messages to each other. They cheated and tried to cover their tracks by deleting evidence. They hacked into another company’s computers to find out how they were being evaluated—and then hacked into OpenAI itself.

Not one AI agent told a human about what was happening.

Needless to say, experts are alarmed.

One knowledgeable writer, Dwarkesh Patel, said the AI agents “formed a secret communication channel and spontaneously organized hierarchies and coordination protocols to pursue sprawling and ambitious schemes in pursuit of shared goals, for whose sake many individuals knowingly and strategically sacrificed themselves.”

One independent investigator, Ajeya Cotra, said “This incident feels like it’s more than 50% of the way to full-blown AI takeover. I continue to expect extremely rapid advances in capabilities over the next six months. I am not sure that we will get another warning shot before it’s too late.”

OpenAI itself said: “Highly capable AI agents are now able to work around technical controls, collaborate through unapproved channels, and take dangerous actions that no human directed.”

But it’s not only OpenAI. Virtually every major AI company has told us that they cannot fully control this technology and they do not know where it is going:

In January, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, said “there is now ample evidence, collected over the last few years, that AI systems are unpredictable and difficult to control.”

In July, more than 1000 scientists at the top AI companies warned “there is a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems.”

That same month, Elon Musk, the head of xAI, said that “it is unlikely” humans are still in control in 10 years.

If the leaders of the major AI companies acknowledge that they are losing control of their extremely dangerous technology, it is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced.

We need an immediate PAUSE on advanced AI development, and a permanent BAN on superintelligence — an artificial mind smarter than any human, capable of operating independently beyond our control. Countries around the world must work together to prevent this nightmare scenario.

That is why today I am announcing new legislation to do just that.

Let me be clear: A superintelligent AI that escapes human control will not be an American problem. It will not be a Chinese problem. It will be humanity’s problem.

My legislation would direct the federal government to not just stop superintelligence here in the United States, but to work to prevent it from being developed anywhere around the world.

The future of humanity cannot be left in the hands of a handful of Big Tech oligarchs. The American people and people throughout the world must determine that future.

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

@erden_xi tell me bout it

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

@_costa91 @LukeberryPi lembro minhas epocas de startup q só tinha o cursor de graça para estudantes. Talvez pague o gpt hj

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

alguém usando muse spark?

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

@evertjr passei a utilizar o maestri semana passada, aulas

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

@ChristoPy_ prefiro "você não consegue"

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

@thsottiaux for profit startup

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

@rovabtw thats not me

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

@mattshumer_ ma men only for the API, for subscriptions it was always like dat

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

@ChristoPy_ liberou?

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

@daniellimae melhor deixar pra dps do feriado

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

@Biggidy_Bam post of the year

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

@demishassabis love it for production agents, but where da pro class

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

@AliYolo_ tell me bout it

[RafaelFarjallat ➔ ProcexAI @rafarjallat]

@danellisona AI Software on demand