Game theory advice:
Whenever you plan something grand, do not start planning from the beginning (t=0). Start at the end, at the final state you wish to reach. From there, you will now go backwards. Constantly ask yourself, "What do I need to do to get there?" and break the large goal down into smaller steps. This method is called backward induction, and it works particularly well when you lack direction. You will be able to work toward your goals with unmatched clarity.
Chasing trendy things (aka jumping the bandwagon) is akin to purchasing a lottery ticket with your time since so many other people are doing the same, leaving no systematic alpha for anyone to mine. Who gets to the finish line, then, is a function of luck (+ capability).
Counterintuitively, alpha is more likely to accrue to people who're happily playing their own unique game.
Ask yourself: what valuable thing wouldn't happen if you don't do it, and then go ahead and do that.
I think India has completely misread the biggest economic shift of the last decade.
Unfortunately the Government of India has failed. Not marginally. Not partially. It has failed in a big way.
For years we have been told that India is the fastest-growing large economy in the world. That our demographics are unmatched. That our consumption story is intact. That global investors cannot ignore us.
Yet look at what has actually happened.
Over the last 4–5 years the world witnessed one of the biggest reallocations of capital in modern history.
Trillions of dollars moved.
The US attracted capital into AI. Taiwan became the semiconductor capital of the world. South Korea became a key beneficiary of the memory and AI boom. Vietnam emerged as a manufacturing destination. Singapore strengthened its position as Asia's capital hub. UAE became a magnet for global entrepreneurs and family offices.
And India?
India largely watched from the sidelines while continuing to sell the same consumption story.
The numbers tell the story.
Net FDI inflows into India have fallen sharply from their peak years.
Private equity activity has slowed materially.
Venture capital funding is a fraction of what it was during the 2021 cycle.
Foreign investors have been net sellers for prolonged periods.
And despite all this there seems to be very little introspection within the system..
Instead every explanation sounds familiar.
"It's a global issue."
"It's temporary."
"It's an AI bubble."
"It's because of interest rates."
At some point we need to stop explaining away reality.
Capital does not care about narratives.
Capital follows opportunity.
And we failed to create enough of it.
China built manufacturing ecosystems that are still decades ahead of us. America built the world's most powerful innovation engine. Taiwan built the semiconductor backbone of the digital economy.
India built compliance.
Ask any foreign investor.
They worry about:
* tax uncertainty
* regulatory complexity
* currency depreciation
* capital movement restrictions
* compliance burden
* endless approvals
These are not ideological issues. These are execution failures.
What makes this even more worrying is that India continues to depend heavily on a consumption-led growth model.
But where does that consumption come from?
A large part comes from:
* salaried professionals
* IT employees
* financial services
* real estate-linked employment
* urban middle class spending
Now look at what AI is doing.
Whether people like it or not this is no longer a passing theme.
It is already reshaping hiring.
It is already reshaping productivity.
It is already changing how businesses think about incremental headcount.
If India misses this wave as well then the consequences will not be limited to the IT sector.
The ripple effects could hit:
* housing demand
* automobiles
* travel
* entertainment
* premium consumption
* retail spending
The second-order impact may be larger than the first-order impact.
And yet where is the urgency?
Where is the national AI mission at scale?
Where are the world-class research incentives?
Where are the regulatory reforms to attract global capital?
Where is the accountability from bureaucrats who have repeatedly missed these shifts?
The most dangerous assumption being made today is that demographics will save India.
Demographics are not an advantage by default.
They are only an advantage if jobs are created faster than aspirations.
Otherwise demographics become pressure.
And pressure eventually becomes unrest.
The world is moving faster than at any point in modern history.
The uncomfortable truth is that India is not competing against its own past anymore.
India is competing against countries that are moving with far greater speed and urgency.
The next 3 years will decide whether India becomes a genuine economic superpower or remains a country endlessly talking about its potential.
Potential does not attract capital. Execution does.
@DonaldMills142 Indeed. It’s not that good ideas aren’t important, they’re just overrated relative to implementation.
The IDEA of going to the Moon is EASY, but GOING to the Moon is HARD.
Nuclear energy, AI and Robotics. Energy, Intelligence and Kinematics. Get these 3 foundational stuff mastered and a nation is on its way to be unbeatable.
Marc Andreessen breaks down the exact personality profile that separates true innovators from everyone else:
According to him, it's a specific combination of five personality traits, each spiked toward the extreme, that almost never shows up in the same person.
He walks through each one using the Big Five framework:
The first is very high openness. Not just in one domain, but across the board.
This is why many of history's great innovators were unusually creative people outside their main field too, because the trait doesn't discriminate.
But openness alone isn't enough.
"If you're just open, you could just be curious and explore, and spend your entire life reading and talking to people and never actually create something."
The second trait is extreme conscientiousness, meaning the willingness to apply yourself to a single thing over many years.
@pmarca is pointed about how this reality gets buried under myth:
"The stories told about these people... there's this kid, this stroke of genius, this moment in time... And it's no — for most of these people it's years and years of applied effort."
Here's where the profile gets genuinely rare: openness and conscientiousness are opposing traits.
Open people drift. Conscientious people grind. Being extreme in both is vanishingly rare.
The third requirement is high disagreeableness. The innovator must be able to hold their conviction when everyone around them says the idea is stupid.
And the world will say it's stupid:
"The reaction most people have to new ideas is, 'Oh, that's dumb.'"
An agreeable person folds and stops pulling the thread. The innovator keeps going, not out of arrogance, but because they structurally don't bend to social pressure.
The fourth trait is high IQ, which Andreessen treats as the price of entry:
"It's hard to innovate in any category if you can't synthesize large amounts of information quickly."
The fifth and final trait is relatively low neuroticism. The innovator has to withstand years of hard work with no guaranteed outcome, and too much anxiety makes that simply unsustainable.
The bottleneck in innovation was never capital, or the quality of ideas — it was always the rarity of a single person carrying all five traits at once.
And on the rare occasion that person exists, that's exactly where breakthroughs come from.
Indian elites just want to beg , beg and beg continously for technology.
Saar pls transfer of technology dedo saar pls hamare logon ko aapka product screwdriver karne ka mauka do saar
Sad part is, this begging is done despite Indian startups,PSU R&D labs having more than enough capabilities to crack the technology in question.
Lack of political will and vision will cost India dearly.
With rare exception, ideas really are trivial compared to execution.
For example, the idea of going to the Moon is simple, but ACTUALLY going to the Moon is staggeringly difficult.
Being morally clean won’t protect you from wolves. Being strategically useful will. In the real world, you aren’t judged by your heart, you’re judged by your leverage. You’re either an asset or a liability. Stop asking to be liked. Become too valuable to ignore.
@KanojiaPJ There's a word for it, when someone attacks citizens over and over and someone says peace despite not being an aggressor. "Coward", "spineless", "pusillanimous".
Back in 2020, @garrytan (current YC chief, but not back then) started speaking about SF city corruption as an ordinary citizen. He was relentlessly trolled and attacked but didn’t stop. Things changed slowly and today SF has come a long way.
Garry continues his crusade. He still gets brutally attacked, doxxed, had to move homes due to life threats etc.
He didn’t give up. He could’ve easily. He’s rich. Why bother ? But that’s the thing. He didn’t. And his community supported him.
He does his part. The community does theirs.
I do my tiny bit and support him unconditionally whenever and wherever needed.
That’s all we can do.
Show up. Support. And not give up.
But the attacks won’t stop - so posting this doesn’t help.
Your old self must die a painful death for your new self to emerge. Most people aren't willing to face that pain head-on, so it becomes their master for the rest of their lives.
@MumukshuSavitri@ANIBLUEMUSE Suggest trustable english translation of original arthashastra that covers strategy, war, leadership, psychological tactics etc plz.