Rahul Fx

Funded Trader | Giveaways❤️‍🔥

[Tradewithsam @Tradewithsam02]

🎁 GIVEAWAY $50K Lucid Pro 🎁

To enter:

Like this post
Follow
@theproptruth
@tradewithsam02

Comment "VAULT"

Winner announced September 1st!

[tradershyam @tradershyam2414]

🎁 GIVEAWAY $50K Lucid Pro 🎁

To enter:

Like this post
Follow
@theproptruth
@tradershyam2414

Comment "VAULT"

Winner announced September 1st!

[Rahul Fx @Rahulfx111]

🎁 GIVEAWAY $50K Lucid Pro 🎁

To enter:

Like this post
Follow
@theproptruth
@rahulfx111

Comment "VAULT"

Winner announced September 1st!

[Rahul Fx @Rahulfx111]

🎁 GIVEAWAY $50K Lucid Pro 🎁

To enter:

Like this post
Follow
@theproptruth
@rahulfx111

Comment "VAULT"

Winner announced September 1st!

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 TRADEIFY — $6,000 PAYOUT REQUEST FOLLOWED BY ACCOUNT BAN?

A trader @arjunnnfx has raised a serious payout dispute involving a $25K Select account with @Tradeify.

According to the trader :

• Trader says he made around $6,000 in profit

• KYC was reportedly approved

• After submitting the payout request, the account was banned

• Support reportedly cited “Duplicate Documents” as the reason

• The trader is now questioning why documents that had already passed verification were later flagged

Tradeify’s current KYC policy states that identity verification is required and that verification issues can involve document or information mismatches.

The key question is the timing and evidence.

@Tradeify @BrettSimba — if duplicate documents were the reason for termination, can you clarify what was detected and why the verification was reportedly approved before the payout request?

A ~$6,000 payout dispute deserves a clear, case-specific explanation.
Rules matter. Verification matters. Transparency matters.

#Tradeify #PropFirm #PropTrading #Payouts

[Rahul Fx @Rahulfx111]

@theproptruth @arjunnnfx @Tradeify @Tradeify @BrettSimba The trader says his KYC was already approved, yet after requesting a ~$6,000 payout the account was reportedly banned for “Duplicate Documents.” What exactly changed between the approval and payout review?

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 TRADEIFY — $6,000 PAYOUT REQUEST FOLLOWED BY ACCOUNT BAN?

A trader @arjunnnfx has raised a serious payout dispute involving a $25K Select account with @Tradeify.

According to the trader :

• Trader says he made around $6,000 in profit

• KYC was reportedly approved

• After submitting the payout request, the account was banned

• Support reportedly cited “Duplicate Documents” as the reason

• The trader is now questioning why documents that had already passed verification were later flagged

Tradeify’s current KYC policy states that identity verification is required and that verification issues can involve document or information mismatches.

The key question is the timing and evidence.

@Tradeify @BrettSimba — if duplicate documents were the reason for termination, can you clarify what was detected and why the verification was reportedly approved before the payout request?

A ~$6,000 payout dispute deserves a clear, case-specific explanation.
Rules matter. Verification matters. Transparency matters.

#Tradeify #PropFirm #PropTrading #Payouts

[Rahul Fx @Rahulfx111]

🎁 GIVEAWAY $50K Lucid Pro 🎁

To enter:

Like this post
Follow
@theproptruth
@Rahulfx111

Comment "VAULT"

Winner announced September 1st!

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 FUNDEDNEXT FUTURES — $4,189 PROFIT DISPUTE AFTER COMPLIANCE SESSION

A trader @Pramod_29_ is publicly disputing the termination of his FundedNext Futures account over an alleged “external assistance”violation during a compliance session.

According to trader’s post:

• He strongly denies receiving any outside assistance and says he was alone during the session.

• He is requesting the specific evidence, timestamp or recording showing where assistance was allegedly detected.

• He has asked for another compliance session to demonstrate that he can complete it independently.

• He says $4,189 in profit was generated before the compliance session and is requesting it under the stated 80% reward split.

• He also says FundedNext had previously processed a $960 payout from the same trading activity.

• He describes this as his first payout after 3.5 years of trading.

FundedNext’s current rules do state that seeking external assistance during a Verification or Compliance Session can result in enforcement, including termination or reward ineligibility.

But the key question in this case is evidence:

@FundedNext — if external assistance was detected, what specific evidence supports the decision?

And if the trader disputes the finding, why not allow another compliance session?

A $4,189 profit dispute deserves a clear, case-specific explanation.
@FundedNext @fnfutures @Jayed_FN @galibsyed_
#FundedNext #FundedNextFutures #PropTrading #PropFirm

[Rahul Fx @Rahulfx111]

🎁 GIVEAWAY $50K Lucid Pro 🎁

To enter:

Like this post
Follow
@propwatchmedia
@rahulfx111

Comment "VAULT"

Winner announced September 1st!

[PropWatch @propwatchmedia]

🚨 BREAKING: FUNDEDNEXT TERMINATES TRADER AFTER PAYOUT REQUEST

A trader claims @fnfutures permanently terminated his $50K Futures account after he requested a payout. He says the account reached $54K+, completed the payout requirements and requested a $1,200 payout.

According to @Pramod_29_ , just 2 hours later, FundedNext requested a Compliance Session. He says he completed it alone, without any external assistance. Around 24 hours later, his account was permanently terminated for allegedly receiving “external assistance” during the session.

The trader strongly denies this and says he repeatedly asked for the evidence, timestamp or recording showing where the alleged assistance was detected but claims he still hasn’t received it.

What makes this even more serious: he says $960 had already been paid from the same trading activity, while $4,189 profit was made before the Compliance Session.

If the violation happened, show the evidence.

What exactly was detected? At what timestamp? What triggered the permanent termination?

A termination notice saying “significant discrepancies” isn’t the same as showing the trader what those discrepancies actually were.

Payout requested → Compliance Session → Alleged violation → Permanent termination.

This sequence alone doesn’t prove wrongdoing by either side. But it absolutely deserves a clear explanation.

@FundedNext @Jayed_FN @galibsyed_
@fnfutures

If the evidence exists, explain it. If there was an error, fix it.

Traders deserve transparency when thousands of dollars are at stake.

[PropWatch @propwatchmedia]

🚨 BREAKING: FUNDEDNEXT TERMINATES TRADER AFTER PAYOUT REQUEST

A trader claims @fnfutures permanently terminated his $50K Futures account after he requested a payout. He says the account reached $54K+, completed the payout requirements and requested a $1,200 payout.

According to @Pramod_29_ , just 2 hours later, FundedNext requested a Compliance Session. He says he completed it alone, without any external assistance. Around 24 hours later, his account was permanently terminated for allegedly receiving “external assistance” during the session.

The trader strongly denies this and says he repeatedly asked for the evidence, timestamp or recording showing where the alleged assistance was detected but claims he still hasn’t received it.

What makes this even more serious: he says $960 had already been paid from the same trading activity, while $4,189 profit was made before the Compliance Session.

If the violation happened, show the evidence.

What exactly was detected? At what timestamp? What triggered the permanent termination?

A termination notice saying “significant discrepancies” isn’t the same as showing the trader what those discrepancies actually were.

Payout requested → Compliance Session → Alleged violation → Permanent termination.

This sequence alone doesn’t prove wrongdoing by either side. But it absolutely deserves a clear explanation.

@FundedNext @Jayed_FN @galibsyed_
@fnfutures

If the evidence exists, explain it. If there was an error, fix it.

Traders deserve transparency when thousands of dollars are at stake.

[Rahul Fx @Rahulfx111]

@theproptruth @Pramod_29_ FundedNext If you have evidence of external assistance, show the exact timestamp or recording. A serious allegation needs evidence @fnfutures @galibsyed_ @Jayed_FN

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 FUNDEDNEXT FUTURES — $4,189 PROFIT DISPUTE AFTER COMPLIANCE SESSION

A trader @Pramod_29_ is publicly disputing the termination of his FundedNext Futures account over an alleged “external assistance”violation during a compliance session.

According to trader’s post:

• He strongly denies receiving any outside assistance and says he was alone during the session.

• He is requesting the specific evidence, timestamp or recording showing where assistance was allegedly detected.

• He has asked for another compliance session to demonstrate that he can complete it independently.

• He says $4,189 in profit was generated before the compliance session and is requesting it under the stated 80% reward split.

• He also says FundedNext had previously processed a $960 payout from the same trading activity.

• He describes this as his first payout after 3.5 years of trading.

FundedNext’s current rules do state that seeking external assistance during a Verification or Compliance Session can result in enforcement, including termination or reward ineligibility.

But the key question in this case is evidence:

@FundedNext — if external assistance was detected, what specific evidence supports the decision?

And if the trader disputes the finding, why not allow another compliance session?

A $4,189 profit dispute deserves a clear, case-specific explanation.
@FundedNext @fnfutures @Jayed_FN @galibsyed_
#FundedNext #FundedNextFutures #PropTrading #PropFirm

[Rahul Fx @Rahulfx111]

@theproptruth @AtmosFunded $9,646 is a serious payout dispute. Show the exact rule breach and evidence.

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 ATMOS FUNDED — $9,646 PAYOUT DISPUTE

A trader is publicly alleging that $9,646 in profits was denied by Atmos Funded.

According the trader :

• A $50K Instant Funding account

• Account balance/equity around $59,647

• Account marked “Breached”

• A payout request reportedly rejected, with Atmos citing a breach of its terms and conditions.

Atmos currently states that payouts require the account to be in profit and free from rule breaches, with payouts generally processed within 2–5 business days after approval.

The key question is simple:

What specific rule was breached, and where is the account-specific evidence supporting the rejection?

@AtmosFunded — if the trader violated a rule, explain exactly what happened. A payout rejection involving

$9,646deserves a clear, evidence-based explanation.

Rules matter. Evidence matters too.
@Atmosfunded
#AtmosFunded #PropFirm #PropTrading #Payouts

[Rahul Fx @Rahulfx111]

@theproptruth @Pipstonecapital @AirRaja Almost a month for one payout? What exactly is causing this delay?

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 PIPSTONE CAPITAL — ALMOST 1 MONTH, PAYOUT STILL PENDING IN PIPSTONE CAPITAL DISCORD SERVER

NO MONEY TO PAY REAL TRADERS — OR ONLY INFLUENCERS GET PAID?

Another trader is raising a serious payout complaint.

According to the Trader :

• $4,282 payout requested on August 24

• Net amount shown: $3,425.60

• Risk-team interview reportedly completed on August 27

• Payout is still showing PENDING

• Trader says there was no rule breach on the evaluation or funded account

• He also claims an influencer received a payout within 3 days, while his payout remains unresolved.

And this isn't the only recent payout complaint. Public reviews include reports of approved payouts still not being received and payouts remaining pending for extended periods.

@PipstoneCapital — why does a payout remain pending for almost a month after the risk interview?

If influencers are genuinely being paid faster than regular traders, explain why. If there is a legitimate reason for the delay, show it.

Traders deserve payments — not endless “please wait” replies.

@Pipstonecapital @AirRaja

[Rahul Fx @Rahulfx111]

@theproptruth @PipstoneCapital @AirRaja Certificate says $192. Trader says he received only $36. Where did the remaining money go?

[The Prop Truth @theproptruth]

🚨 PIPSTONE CAPITAL — PAYOUT CERTIFICATE, BUT WHERE IS THE MONEY?

Multiple traders are now raising payout concerns in Pipstone Capital’s Discord.

According to the trades :

• $240 payout requested → $192 shown on certificate → only $36 reportedly received

• Another trader received a $167.20 payout certificate but says only $52 was paid

• A third trader bave an approved $1,512 reward and he got only 302 $ certificate .

while questioning deductions despite showing no rule violation in the screenshots.

The bigger concern is the difference between the payout amount shown on the certificate and the amount reportedly received by traders.

Pipstone’s published information currently states a 90/10 reward split for funded accounts, while its website also advertises fast payout processing.

So why are traders reporting amounts that appear significantly lower than their certificates?

These screenshots are reportedly from the “Scam” section of Pipstone’s Discord, and there are also recent public complaints about payout denials and approved payouts not being received.

@PipstoneCapital — What exactly are these deductions, and why is the certificate amount different from the amount traders actually receive?

Traders deserve a clear breakdown of every deduction before trusting a payout certificate. 👀
@Pipstonecapital @AirRaja
#PipstoneCapital #PropFirm #PropTrading #Payouts

[Rahul Fx @Rahulfx111]

@propwatchmedia 🙌

[PropWatch @propwatchmedia]

🚨ALERT : TRADERS WHY ARE YOU STILL BUYING EVALUATIONS?

If you already know how to trade, why spend days fighting a challenge just to prove you can trade?

GFT’s Instant Funding puts you straight into a funded account from Day 1 with no evaluation and no profit target.

Choose your route:Instant GOAT , Instant HERO or Instant PREMIUM

No phases. No waiting to pass an evaluation. Just pick the account that fits your trading style and get to work.

Maybe your next trade doesn’t need another challenge. It needs a funded account!

[Rahul Fx @Rahulfx111]

@theproptruth @t_a_m_i_l TradingLucid If “coordinated trading” is the reason, show the exact trades that triggered it.@TradingLucid @ajtradinglucid