Only posting to say that no one should be on this platform. Nothing the vast majority of you have to say is of sufficient importance to justify giving content to this person.
Thinking pushing progressive policies means lists and pages of policies is part of the problem.
Ideological perceptions matter more than "she's got a plan".
“Ultimately, concerns about immigration did not resonate as much as pocketbook issues with many Hispanics.
About 7 in 10 Hispanic voters were “very concerned” about the cost of food and groceries, slightly more than about two-thirds of voters overall”.
https://t.co/k5mxmyUNKg
It's classic that if there's one thing on LK Twitter where a consensus exists, it's re. spam text messages from politicians. Yet, there's fuck all we can do about it, and those responsible seem to have no interest in acting on the matter either.
Does anyone know any way I can contact Adam Friedland? I have for many years tried every other route to contact him, and it's likely that he simply doesn't wish to speak to me, but as a last ditch attempt - I am throwing this out into the universe 🙏🏻
“David Plouffe wanted to run a 2008 campaign for a 2024 election,”
“There was no one who had a different viewpoint. And anybody who had a different viewpoint was always sidelined,”
Jasmine Wright is one of the best sourced reporters inside Kamala Harris world and she’s out with her first report on what went wrong.
A lot of it adds up.
When I noticed the campaign spending a fortune on Instagram and Facebook ads for fundraising I assumed that a ton of money was coming in.
Campaigns don’t *normally* spend that much to not at least make a little profit.
Ultimately, the missing of fundraising goals isn’t a problem with the fundraisers…it’s an issue with the campaign staff who made the spending decisions.
Full Story: https://t.co/1fZoJPJAHP
As you can see from the galaxy brain takes on here about local politics, this is something that many struggle to grasp.
“[a] lesson the party wants to hammer home to its activists and MPs – that voters will set the agenda, not politicians.”
https://t.co/D78XVkek2b
The e capitalists whom the FT represents prefer a degree or political order to plan and function while the culture warriors at the NY'er and NYT are scared and confused but also high on their own supply.
It's amazing how the Financial Times is now significantly to the left of The New York Times and The New Yorker. The latter continue to beat the drum about how the stupidity and racism of the poors is the problem, while the FT keeps saying...it's the political economy, stupid!
Dear @dialoglk I never consented to having my personal information used by these politicians. We need a global, subscriber level opt out, not the current, impractical port level block. Ideally this should be a violation of the Data Protection Act.