I've written a lot about the issues around Facebook, its governance, and its business model, so I'm going to self-promote a bit. This from 'The Moral Economy of Tech' https://t.co/mypcBcA6Bf
@JamieXML (You've probably seen it, or an earlier version of the same talk, but...) There can be few more attention-grabbing examples of 'devices that have control over your life' than this https://t.co/fbsBikv2dJ
Seen earlier on the Andrews & Arnold irc channel (from a customer, not a staff member): "as far as I can tell, BT think of themselves as a misplaced arm of the government, so the whole concept of "monopoly" doesn't quite fit them...it's more like dealing with the civil service"
I made a thing! 🎉👇
Just run `curl https://t.co/yAr5HS6Qud` and you should get a live parrot in your terminal!
👉Check out the code here: https://t.co/zLGuvT9gZf
Thanks to @jmhobbs for the inspiration🐦
#partyparrot✌️
What if a billion people had access to easy end to end encrypted messaging, except it was useless because a majority of them unknowingly backed up their and their friend's chats and group chats to Google Drive unencrypted, so the government can just subpoena Google.
I've reached that age where the surveillance economy's algorithms and data science routines have analysed my lifestyle and determined that what I most need is "quick drying pants". https://t.co/UKV7Ew9YPk
@neilturkewitz@EFF@cyberleagle Neither the tweet nor the article claim that. Both refer to the rationale behind the proposal, not its practicality or feasibility.