Price Bonus is now live on FPL Review as a solver setting!
This acts as an incentive to buy or sell players based on forecasted progress towards an SV change
Getting these market effects integrated into the solver is a significant step, something many of us had been estimating manually on top of solver outputs for years
This is currently a beta feature and is defaulted off, as it's quite a big change for many. You can default it on from the settings sidebar.
@fplreview I've done this 0.1 less itb for each future transfer for a long time - but I am considering to remove because the plan always change a lot anyway.
@fpl_schultz ... Problem is off course I'm not sure how much trouble i'll be in navigation BGW22 followed by DGW34/37 with probably big teams (MCI, MUN, TOT, BHA) blanking and doubling.
#FPL#GW25
So I calculated EV 9 GW horisont for the 95 combination of WC GW25-33, FH in GW25, 27, 28, 29 or 32 and BB i GW29. I did for both LIV playing and NOT playing i BGW28.
Best strategy FH25, WC26 and BB29. I never planned towards this and I do even have 2 FT!
@fpl_schultz Not locked until deadline, but certainly still seriously considering. The case itself is fine I think. Giving me aroung 20 EV for each of the chips is broadly accepted. Also just checked that only FH25 makes sense for my team if FH before GW33.....
@FplAuto Absoluttely - I just don't know (yet) how much it is worth. And if I can gain 54-60 EV by playing know, I think I wont loose out. Also gives me lot's of FT to plan with fixture certainty towards GW33+
@UkendtPerson45 I must commit to FH25 right? Good thing is the strategies are the same wether LIV blank in GW28 or NOT and the WC26-28 played when we know. 5-6 more EV if LIV blank which is more likely. Question is how much EV can be gain by saving chip for GW33+?!