@obliiviiscariis Even Chainlink's roadmap acknowledges the multisig needs to be decentralized through staking and slashing. Until those upgrade keys are burned or handed to the network, it's an operational trust model. Same as Quant, except Quant has been upfront about that from the start.
@obliiviiscariis Respect the analysis. But banks aren't using blockchains for trustlessness. They want programmable money and atomic settlement. No compliance team has ever asked to remove trust from the system. They want trusted systems to work faster. Both projects win in different lanes.
@obliiviiscariis Chainlink wins DeFi and US capital markets pilots. Quant is in live production with six UK banks right now through the GBTD programme. Both can be true. The "only one can be the standard" framing is the part that's wrong.
@obliiviiscariis The most critical financial plumbing on earth runs on accountable systems operated by identified parties under regulatory supervision. That's not legacy thinking, that's how regulated markets work by law. There won't be one global standard. There never is...
@BuresFlow Nobody at the Canucks is telling Dhali what their draft board is. It’s his job to ask questions and infer, and he’s good at it. But it’s speculation. Here’s another issue. It’s possible that Caleb is a Hall of Famer and Stenberg flames out. No sure things.
@elshredo@gverdian For the 1000th time… you’re not “investors”. You’re network participants. You don’t own stock. You own network tokens. You guys need to understand the distinction. Know what you own and what you’re entitled to.
@i_compounding@quantnetwork@TokenInsight Your analysis is built on a misunderstanding of the token model, a stale distribution chart, non-existent staking mechanics, and equity metaphors that don’t apply to utility tokens. But ok.