.

[. @randomuser0304]

@Vacio3012 @Laine_MiB @taxingman37 @Starbear_ent No it shouldn’t because that contradicts what is in TFC. When you try and move a soul(s) into a different object, in similarity towards the Novels, you have to have them freely release a portion of themselves in order for them to be split/have control over that object.

[. @randomuser0304]

@Vacio3012 @Laine_MiB @taxingman37 @Starbear_ent The Toys were scrapped. The DCI lost their bodies so they were able to move on much easier and faster then, the MCI who are still tied down by their animatronics, it’s as simple as that.

Another option is that they are being sat on and waiting to be used but that is unlikely.

[. @randomuser0304]

@Mr_Cool_26 @oJam3s There is genuinely no proof the DCI got retconned, not being brought up again because their story was self-contained isn't an argument for that.

[. @randomuser0304]

@KJSykes2 @oJam3s The second MCI is the correct name for them.

[. @randomuser0304]

@TacoMan1953765 @oJam3s When you essentially cause another murder spree to happen in your game and actively focus on it with an investigation and a series of phone calls, you don’t throw out the 5-6 murder victims as candidates for the 5-6 new animatronics that actively hunt you down.

[. @randomuser0304]

@Laine_MiB @Vacio3012 @taxingman37 @Starbear_ent The DCI possess the Toys, there’s no MCI remnant in them.

[. @randomuser0304]

@SuhJamesNsane @SmoochaGhost2 The DCI were not dead adults. TWB references the DCI as rumors of missing kids and we know he cannot be talking about the MCI because everyone knew they went missing at Freddy’s so they are not the rumors that Ralph mentioned.

So the DCI are another set of missing kids.

[. @randomuser0304]

@legomeaker101 @bigbiter83 @sheepnstein The FNaF 1 location is the same location as where the MCI occurred just reopened in 1993,

[. @randomuser0304]

@Vacio3012 @Laine_MiB @taxingman37 @Starbear_ent That’s not how it works, Toys are possessed by the the DCI.

[. @randomuser0304]

@Laine_MiB @Vacio3012 @taxingman37 @Starbear_ent Their story was already finished, no reason to bring them back up in FNaF 6.

[. @randomuser0304]

@s____0100 @Vault0358 The bodies were hidden or removed after SAVETHEM since Ralph mentions rumors of missing kids (DCI) and the Bite of ‘87 when talking about the FNaF 2 tragedies and why the FNaF 1 location isn’t doing so well after reopening.

[. @randomuser0304]

@Ilovelifefreddy @s____0100 How is it total bullshit? ToysDCI is the only correct answer out of all of the DCI theories.

[. @randomuser0304]

@SmoochaGhost2 The DCI occurs the week before FNAF 2 when William was the guard (remember SAVE THEM he's wearing his security badge), it's only the rumours and then investigations that begin ramping up and being connected to Freddy's (and then confirmed to be connected) as the game progresses

[. @randomuser0304]

@taxingman37 @Starbear_ent It doesn’t take away anything since the MCI are important to the overall story since they’re the reason why it started it all to begin with.

You’re also not bringing up the fact that there’s another set of missing children in SB.

[. @randomuser0304]

@Vacio3012 @taxingman37 @Starbear_ent They are mentioned in The Week Before.

[. @randomuser0304]

@Slickji @Starbear_ent The DCI’s bodies were not found since they’re labeled as rumors of missing kids by Ralph in TWB.

Agony wasn’t a concept when FNaF 2 was made but the Toys are possessed by the DCI kids.

[. @randomuser0304]

@AllycatDraws @BunkZiller @Starbear_ent The corpses in the SAVETHEM mini-game are confirmed to be kids in TWB mentioning them as rumors of missing kids and also mentioning the Bite of ‘87.

[. @randomuser0304]

@legomeaker101 @bigbiter83 @sheepnstein The DCI is not the MCI because the MCI happened at the FNaF 1 location, not the FNaF 2.

FNaF 2 shows us 2 separate set of murders therefore, it’s not a theory, it’s a fact.

[. @randomuser0304]

@cosmicectoplasm @LuciousSakki @Starbear_ent Welcome to FNaF.

[. @randomuser0304]

@cosmicectoplasm @LuciousSakki @Starbear_ent Then why did you decide to comment if you just could ignore it?