Randy كَافِر

[Randy كَافِر @randy_gffg]

@DefiyantlyFree Absolutely beautifully put!

[Insurrection Barbie @DefiyantlyFree]

Christianity is not about silence or retreat. The Bible does not teach believers to sit back while lies spread, order collapses, or truth is twisted in the name of empathy. Scripture presents God as a God of order and truth, and it places responsibility on His people to defend both. Sometimes calmly, and yes, sometimes very passionately.

The Bible is clear that law and civil authority are not evil inventions. Paul says plainly that governing authorities exist because God allows them to exist, and that authority exists to restrain wrongdoing (Romans 13:1–2).

That does not mean every law is perfect, but it does mean that law itself is legitimate and necessary. A nation that refuses to enforce its own laws is not being empathetic. It is being negligent. Order is not cruelty. It is the structure that allows justice to exist at all.

Peter reinforces this idea when he tells believers to submit to governing authorities because they are meant to punish wrongdoing and commend what is right (1 Peter 2:13–14). Enforcement is not hatred. Accountability is not oppression. A system with no consequences is not compassionate. It is unstable, and instability always hurts the weakest people first.

The Bible’s commands about caring for foreigners are often quoted, but usually without context. Scripture never says that compassion means ignoring the law. In Israel, foreigners were protected, but they were not above the law. God explicitly says the same law applies to the foreigner and the native-born alike (Leviticus 24:22; Numbers 15:16). Biblical compassion means dignity within justice, not exemption from all laws and accountability.

Justice, according to Scripture, is what gives a nation stability. Proverbs says that justice strengthens a country, while corruption tears it down (Proverbs 29:4). The Bible never presents chaos as holy or disorder as loving. A nation that cannot define its boundaries, enforce its laws, or speak honestly about reality cannot protect citizens, or legal immigrants. Our God is a God of order. Chaos, that’s a devil thing. Not a God thing.

Truth is just as central. The Bible does not treat lying as a small issue, even when it is done for emotional or political reasons. The commandment against bearing false witness (Exodus 20:16) establishes truthfulness as a moral obligation, not a personal preference. Proverbs says outright that God detests lying lips (Proverbs 12:22). There are no exceptions added for lies that feel compassionate.

The New Testament doubles down on this. Paul tells believers to put away falsehood and speak truthfully (Ephesians 4:25). That is not a call to neutrality or silence. It is a call to honesty, even when honesty is uncomfortable. In another letter, Paul says believers are to take every thought captive to obey Christ (2 Corinthians 10:5). That is active language. It assumes resistance. The truth though, that has to be defended.

Scripture also does not say we must defend truth without emotion. Passion is not sinful when it is directed toward righteousness. The prophets spoke with urgency and fire. Jesus Himself confronted lies directly and publicly. What the Bible warns against is sinful anger rooted in pride or hatred (Ephesians 4:26), not conviction rooted in truth. Caring deeply about truth is not a failure of faith. Indifference actually is.

Isaiah tells God’s people to seek justice and correct what is wrong (Isaiah 1:17). Correction requires speaking up. It requires backbone. Silence in the face of lies is not humility. It is abdication.

The Bible never pits mercy against justice. Micah sums it up simply. Act justly, love mercy, and walk humbly with God (Micah 6:8). The order matters. Justice comes first, because mercy without justice turns into disorder disguised as kindness.

The Bible supports lawful order, equal accountability, and truth spoken clearly. It does not call Christians to surrender to deception, soften truth until it disappears, or apologize for moral clarity.

[TheLizVariant @TheLizVariant]

This explains it really well, because the double standards are really hard to wrap your mind around. It isn’t about morality or good and evil, or even right and wrong. It’s about power.

[German Shepherd Dad 🇺🇸 & 🔥 @FlagAndFire]

This is a great explanation of how the elites have been carrying out a color revolution in the United States over the last 10 years.

[Senator Eric Schmitt @SenEricSchmitt]

I want my Republican colleagues to hear me on this.

It’s not ICE or Border Patrol that is causing this terror. It is militant leftists and their enablers in the Democratic Party machine.

ICE and Border Patrol are American heroes—and we owe them absolute, unflinching support.

[☘️𝕃𝕦𝕔𝕜𝕪 𝕄𝕔𝔾𝕖𝕖‎ @LuckyMcGee]

THIS. 🔥 Every single word of this. 🎯 👇🏼

[Greg Price @greg_price11]

To my leftist friends:

I do not care that a leftist agitator got himself killed because he decided to arm himself with a gun and venture out to resist ICE, nor the other one who sped her car at an ICE agent while fleeing arrest, nor do I care about the little kid who was detained with his illegal alien father.

And neither do you, because all you care about are turning people-- whose deaths never would have happened if you people didn't have a psychopathic opposition to lawful immigration enforcement-- into martyrs who can be used to justify ending deportations, which you want because it's the biggest threat to Democratic political power.

What I do care about is the fact that there are millions of illegal aliens that have invaded my country. Your party are the ones who spent the previous 4 years importing as many of them into America as possible-- allowing millions of foreign military-aged men to cross the southern border and resettling them all around the country with our tax dollars.

You didn't give a crap about the thousands of unaccompanied children that smugglers dropped off at the border-- nor the thousands that went missing-- in one of the biggest child trafficking operations in the world that happened because of your party.

You didn't care about real victims like Laken Riley, Jocelyn Nungaray, and Rachel Morin-- not agitators trying to obstruct law enforcement-- but innocent people who were minding their own business when they were brutally murdered by criminal illegal aliens that Biden released into the country.

But you people have decided that it's imperative that these illegals be able to stay. That somebody fresh over the border from Honduras is just as American as the rest of us. That somebody with such disrespect for our country that their first contribution to it was breaking our immigration laws should be given the same rights as every American. That they should be allowed to continue stealing jobs, driving up housing costs, and mooching off American taxpayers.

And you want this for one reason and one reason only: Because it's the only way you can continue winning elections. You don't actually care about any of these people. You just want to give them citizenship so they can vote for Democrats and count them in the census so that blue states have more electoral votes than they deserve.

All you want is to import as many foreigners as possible and give them a stake in the political future of our country so that Democrats can rule forever without the consent from actual Americans who you couldn't give two craps about.

And you of course don't actually want to deal with the consequences of mass immigration. The places you live are not the ones where massive demographic changes have happened almost overnight. You'll continue living in your majority-white affluent communities while working class Americans deal with the influx of your new class of voters.

And now, you are have decided that burning down the entire country is worth it if it means your precious illegal aliens get to stay. Your politicians are the ones have actively encouraged the riots in places like Minneapolis and radicalized people into thinking they have a right to obstruct lawful immigration enforcement. Renee good and Alex Pretti are dead because of you.

I, along with 77 million other Americans, voted for a government that promised mass deportations. And that doesn't mean just gang members and criminals. It means every single person who crossed the border illegally or has overstayed their visa. It doesn't matter if they're a murderer or uber eats driver. We voted to get rid of them all because America is a sovereign nation that has the right to deport people with no right to be here in the first place.

So no, I simply do not care about any of the sob stories that you manufacture on a daily basis to emotionally manipulate people against lawful enforcement of our immigration laws. I don't care if federal agents wearing masks triggers you, I don't care about your tug-at-the-heartstrings propaganda, and I especially don't care that your illegal alien "neighbors" feel scared.

We're sick of being told we're bad people for objecting to the hordes of third-world illegals that you brought here without our consent. The moment you decide that Americans matter more to you than protecting illegals is the moment the chaos and death comes to an end. But you won't because all you are useful idiots for a machine that seeks to make Americans poor and miserable in the country their ancestors built.

[Dr. Jebra Faushay @JebraFaushay]

According to George Orwell, women are almost always on the side of the state.

Essentially, this guy breaks down the psychology of wokeness without calling anyone a raging liberal, crazy leftist, or legally insane.

[Carl Higbie @CarlHigbie]

“Democrats think Trump is randomly doing stuff… he’s like 17 steps ahead of [NATO] and by the time they figure it out it’s too late to do anything about it”

[Gerd Buurmann @Buurmann]

Der Vergleich der amerikanischen Immigrationsbehörde ICE mit der Gestapo ist eine Geschmacklosigkeit, die kaum zu überbieten ist.

ICE ist eine staatliche Exekutivbehörde eines demokratischen Rechtsstaates. Sie handelt auf Grundlage geltender Gesetze, unterliegt richterlicher Kontrolle, parlamentarischer Aufsicht und öffentlicher Kritik. Keine Maßnahme von ICE erfolgt ohne rechtliche Referenz: Entscheidungen und Maßnahmen können vor Gericht angefochten, überprüft und begrenzt werden. Genau das unterscheidet sie fundamental von der Gestapo.

ICE ist kein Instrument einer Partei. Sie wurde unter demokratischen wie republikanischen Präsidenten eingesetzt.

ICE verfolgt keine Menschen wegen ihrer Herkunft, sondern setzt bestehende Einwanderungsgesetze um. In den USA ist der Aufenthalt ohne gültige Aufenthaltserlaubnis per Definition ein Verstoß gegen das Einwanderungsrecht, weshalb Personen ohne legalen Status in der Regel als „illegal“ nach US‑Recht gelten. ICE‑Maßnahmen richten sich gegen diese Rechtsverstöße.

ICE nimmt zudem viele Personen mit schweren Straftaten fest. Dazu gehören unter anderem Menschenhändler, Kinderhändler, organisierte Schleuser, Drogen- und Waffenhändler sowie Täter sexualisierter Gewalt. Diese Menschen werden nicht festgenommen, weil ICE rassistisch motiviert wäre, sondern weil sie nach geltendem Recht Straftaten begangen haben oder illegal im Land sind.

ICE ist eine plural zusammengesetzte Behörde, in der Menschen mit unterschiedlichen kulturellen, ethnischen und religiösen Hintergründen arbeiten. Das Bild einer pauschal rassistischen, ideologisch verblendeten Truppe verkennt die Komplexität institutioneller Zusammensetzung und der rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen.

Die Opfer der Gestapo wurden systematisch allein aufgrund ihrer Zugehörigkeit zu bestimmten Gruppen verfolgt und ermordet, nicht, weil sie Gesetze gebrochen hatten, sondern aufgrund rassistischer, antisemitischer Ideologie. ICE verfolgt nicht Migranten, sondern illegale und straffällig gewordene Migranten. Die Gestapo verfolgte alle Juden. Das ist der Unterschied. Die Juden wurden im nationalsozialistischen Deutschland nicht wegen eines Rechtsverstoßes verfolgt, sondern sie wurden verfolgt, deportiert und ermordet, weil sie Juden waren.

Damit kommen wir zur immer wieder kolportierten Behauptung, ICE‑Beamte seien „wie die Gestapo maskiert“. Auch das ist moralisch perfide. ICE‑Beamte tragen in bestimmten Einsatzlagen Gesichtsbedeckungen nicht aus Ideologie oder Menschenverachtung, sondern aus Selbstschutz. Sie tun dies, weil sie bedroht, angegriffen oder verfolgt werden, etwa wenn Namen, Familien oder Wohnorte öffentlich gemacht werden und ihnen offen Gewalt angedroht wird, legitimiert durch eine aggressive Rhetorik, die sie zu „Nazis“ erklärt.

Wer Beamte systematisch als „Gestapo“ bezeichnet, weiß genau, was er tut: Er erklärt sie zu legitimen Zielen. Er normalisiert Gewalt gegen sie. Der Gestapo-Vorwurf ist eine Entmenschlichung, um Gewalt zu legitimieren. Dass sich diese Beamten schützen müssen, ist kein Zeichen von Faschismus, sondern ein Alarmsignal für eine aufgeheizte Öffentlichkeit, in der Gewalt rhetorisch vorbereitet wird.

Der Straßenmob, der staatliche Beamte einschüchtert, bedroht und angreift; die gezielte Entmenschlichung von Amtsträgern; die Legitimation von Gewalt als „Widerstand“ – all das sind Muster, die man aus der Geschichte kennt. Es ist die Logik der Einschüchterung, wie sie von der SA und anderen faschistischen Bewegungen in der Geschichte praktiziert wurde. Nicht der Rechtsstaat, der sich schützt, sondern der Mob, der ihn delegitimiert, bewegt sich hier auf faschistischem Terrain.

Der Gestapo‑Vergleich ist nicht nur falsch, er ist eine Umkehr von Täter‑ und Opferrollen, eine Entwertung jüdischen Leidens und eine Banalisierung staatlich organisierten Massenmords. Er verschiebt historische Schuld, verwischt moralische Grenzen und normalisiert Antisemitismus unter dem Deckmantel politischer Empörung.

[Capt Kyle @CaptKylePatriot]

Prove him wrong!

He makes so many good points!

@CaptKylePatriot

[AmericanPapaBear™ @AmericaPapaBear]

"I am watching this movie about Abraham Lincoln."

"Did you know that the Democrats called him a dictator because he wanted to free the slaves and went to war with the confederate Democrats?"

"They were upset that nobody else would do these jobs."

Some things never change huh?

[Sadie @Sadie_NC]

When the truth has been spoken, but those with ulterior motives drowned it out.

[🔥🇺🇸 KC 🇺🇸🔥 @KCPayTreeIt]

"Democrats are right, Trump’s causing division!" 🗣️✝️🇺🇸

[Randy كَافِر @randy_gffg]

There's actual science behind it as well. That's actually very explainable. It's called Force Science. Everyone should look it up because it's very insightful and actually pretty amazing how the human brain works. Because of training, he saw a threat and his brain automatically started the process of pulling the gun and firing a round as he got hit/scraped. The firing of the gun is not quite a conscious act, but not subconscious either, as it's more of a trained response. Now, the turning of his body, that was purely subconscious. I would bet money if you asked him after the shooting how he got turned, he probably would think it was from the car hitting him, not even realizing he did it. Now, to turn OFF the "pull the trigger, pull the trigger, pull the trigger" response, that takes an actual conscious thought. It takes time for the eyes to see, tell the brain, brain process a change, and then tell the extremities. That's why you see Officer involved shootings where the suspect is initially shot in the front, turns and is then shot in the back. The officer shooting didn't process the turn until more shots had been fired. Same thing here with the car moving. The fact that he could process the car turning away and ONLY fire 3 shots, and all shots done in seconds, is actually pretty damn amazing and almost superman like reflexes. Most incidents of "mag dumps" the officers would have told you that they shot 2 maybe 3 times, not the 10-15 (depending on magazine) that they actually shot. He may even only be able to recount the very FIRST shot and not the two that followed. That is why it is taken at a totality of the circumstances and not shot by shot. Actual science

[Randy كَافِر @randy_gffg]

That's actually very explainable. It's called Force Science. You should look it up because it's very insightful and actually pretty amazing how the human brain works. Because of training, he saw a threat and his brain automatically started the process of pulling the gun and firing a round as he got hit/scraped. The firing of the gun is not quite a conscious act, but not subconscious either, as it's more of a trained response. Now, the turning of his body, that was purely subconscious. I would bet money if you asked him after the shooting how he got turned, he probably would think it was from the car hitting him, not even realizing he did it. Now, to turn OFF the "pull the trigger, pull the trigger, pull the trigger" response, that takes an actual conscious thought. It takes time for the eyes to see, tell the brain, brain process a change, and then tell the extremities. That's why you see Officer involved shootings where the suspect is initially shot in the front, turns and is then shot in the back. The officer shooting didn't process the turn until more shots had been fired. Same thing here with the car moving. The fact that he could process the car turning away and ONLY fire 3 shots, and all shots done in seconds, is actually pretty damn amazing and almost superman like reflexes. Most incidents of "mag dumps" the officers would have told you that they shot 2 maybe 3 times, not the 10-15 (depending on magazine) that they actually shot. He may even only be able to recount the very FIRST shot and not the two that followed. That is why it is taken at a totality of the circumstances and not shot by shot. Actual science

[Sassafrass84 @Sassafrass_84]

I love this video so much. You will too. This is what we stand for. This is the conservative movement. And if you stand with us too, drop a flag in the comments. Share this out. Spread the message.

America First.

God, Country, and Freedom. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[Randy كَافِر @randy_gffg]

It could be as simple as, when he used restraint he was severely injured. Being put in a similar situation, he already knew what the outcome COULD be, and therefore his threat assessment was higher and his response to said threat was higher to avoid anymore severe injury or possible death.

[Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸 @KathleenWinche3]

This man is spot on about the false narrative of the liberal mind virus! 🦠
The silence during Biden regime was deafening when they arrested illegals during his time in office!
Hypocrisy once again! 🤦‍♀️

[Randy كَافِر @randy_gffg]

First off, that whole argument is void because the poster doesn't even know what he's talking about. There is no such thing as reasonable cause. There is reasonable SUSPICION and probable CAUSE. So already the poster is a moron and shouldn't be taken as a subject matter expert. Second, all law enforcement, local, county, state, FEDERAL etc can detain and arrest anyone committing a felony in their view, EVEN if said officer is not in their jurisdiction (like if a local officer from Texas was in ohio and saw a felony). ALL Federal officers can arrest for any felony they see. Obstructing a federal officer when said officer is doing his job/duties is.....wait for it. Let it simmer a little....a FELONY. So yes, they had ever legal right and standing to stop her and remove her from her car for detention and/or arrest. She wasn't leaving the scene, she was evading arrest. So the OP is wrong on all of his counts and you should probably stop sharing that very incorrect screen shot or look like a moron like the OP.