@GhazalThakur@ANINewsUP@ukcmo@pushkardhami Who gave the authority to call these Nihangs as terrorists? Are you above all govt authorities? Any govt agency declared them terrorists? It may happen that these Nihangs have taken law into their hands for a spur of the moment, if it’s so, authorities will take action. stfu
@propitiousoul@ahmedalifayyaz If this story is correct, then hats off & best wishes to 17 RR, for ‘overhauling service’ to the errant police station. Looking forward for more such services 😎
@ANI Sikh community neither hurt nor angry, however they are laughing at the propaganda spread by the ‘Siron Munni Kali Dal’ with the help of their Aka PeeJP. Moreover Sikh community is also surprised to see how an educated person like you, is playing on the music of illiterate fools.
@Dig_raw21@mavrickkilo What operational rehearsal was conducted in Chakrata Cantt? Do you know, Indian Army is well trained for neutralising militants, without collateral damage, do you know?
@ShivrattanDhil1 Your concerns are valid, that this movmnt may take some anther dirn, if not handled properly by some wise ppl, but r you absolutly fine with the present system, which is forcing GenZ to follow such accts? Bdw.. if you admit that there is democracy, then GenZ also hav d rt to say
Dear Anand,
Your appreciation of the issue, I say this with due respect, does not appear to be grounded in the full factual and legal context. Diverting the core concern towards a debate on so-called “IPS hegemony” in the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) does not address the real question at hand.
Let me clarify at the outset: there is no contest between services. We hold the Indian Police Service, and every other service, in equal regard. Each was created with a defined mandate to serve the people of this country. The present issue is not about inter-service comparison, but about adherence to established service jurisprudence and principles of fairness within the framework of Organized Group ‘A’ Services (OGAS).
The CAPFs—such as Central Reserve Police Force, Border Security Force, and others—have been recognized as Organized Group ‘A’ Services. The fundamental attribute of an OGAS is a structured cadre management system ensuring assured career progression through internal promotions, particularly for posts up to the Senior Administrative Grade (SAG), which in these forces corresponds to the level of Inspector General (IG).
It is precisely this principle that cadre officers have been consistently asserting. The demand is simple and legitimate: that posts up to SAG level be filled by promotion from within the cadre, as is the norm across other OGAS in the Government of India. This is neither a demand for exclusivity nor an opposition to deputation. Deputation is a well-recognized administrative tool, and we are not against it. However, deputation cannot become a mechanism to structurally deny cadre officers their rightful promotional avenues.
The issue has also been examined judicially. The Supreme Court of India, after considering all arguments—including those relating to operational requirements, coordination, and leadership inputs from IPS officers—did not accept the justification for continued deviation from OGAS principles in CAPFs. The spirit of that judgment was to restore parity and uphold cadre rights.
It is pertinent to note that the Railway Protection Force, functioning under the Ministry of Railways, has moved towards implementing the judicial directive in letter and spirit. This demonstrates that administrative alignment with the legal position is both feasible and practical. The divergence in approach by the Ministry of Home Affairs, therefore, raises legitimate concerns.
What is even more troubling is the recent legislative attempt to accord statutory backing to a structure that effectively bypasses the intent of the judicial pronouncement. If this perception holds true, it risks undermining not only cadre morale but also the sanctity of service rules and the principle of equality across OGAS.
The recurring arguments—that IPS officers are inherently more competent, better strategists, or superior in coordination—are neither substantiated nor relevant in a rules-based system. Competence is not the monopoly of any one service, and institutional frameworks cannot be built on subjective assessments. CAPF cadre officers have decades of operational experience, field exposure, and institutional knowledge that are indispensable to these forces.
Let us, therefore, not lose sight of the real issue. This is about:
•Upholding the defined structure of Organized Group ‘A’ Services
•Ensuring fair and predictable career progression for cadre officers
•Respecting judicial pronouncements
•Maintaining institutional integrity over individual or service-based preferences
We are not against any service, nor are we seeking to exclude anyone. We are only seeking what is already recognized in law and practice across the Government of India.
I hope you will reconsider your position in light of these facts and engage with the issue in its proper legal and administrative context.@PMOIndia@HMOIndia@AshokKumar_IPS@opsinghips@HMOIndia@NcAsthana@kamalkant1961@vikram_ips
🚨Manipur:
Security forces opened fire in self defence injuring 4x protestors.
Context:- last night, suspected Kuki insurgents k8lled 2x children in an unprovoked attack. Angry Meitei protestors stormed a CAPF camp.
@Observer_GP@Warrior_Mukul So what, if an MP had tea & biscuits at the stairs of Parliament? Is there any restriction or law, binding his from having tea? Any CrPC or BNSS section?