🧵5 Top Free Alternatives to BioRender for Scientific Illustrations!
These five websites offer free scientific illustrations for biologists. Great for presentations, research papers and other research communication needs.
Save and share the post!
PhD students: Remember to apply for the Google PhD fellowship. It will make your PhD super smooth.
Application opens on 10th April 2025
Deadline: 15th May 2025
PhD programs are pausing admissions to graduate school due to NIH indirect cost cuts. See the growing number of programs here: https://t.co/3j759AlhGL
How is science supposed to advance with fewer trainees, less $ for research? This is devastating.
How cool is this? Michal Lipinski from @broadinstitute presenting stacked #Illumina spatial slides of the mouse brain with subcellular transcriptome resolution #AGBTGM
It's clear that many do not understand what @NIH-funded research does to improve health. It's time to revive a study published 10 years ago that provides incredible information about this. link in the comment
Every single new drug approved by the FDA from 2010–2016 was built on NIH-funded research—that’s all 210 drugs. But what the public sees is just the tip of the iceberg.
Pharma takes credit for the final product, but beneath each drug developed, there are ~20 years of basic research, and 90% of the cost is from basic research funded by the NIH, which discovers drug targets, understands disease mechanisms, and creates life-saving treatments.
Figuring out how cancer evades the immune system, how addiction rewires the brain, and how heart disease develops is the role of the NIH, creating the foundation for the breakthrough drugs that come 20 years later, and the NIH does all that with only 0.8% of the US budget.
Without NIH, there would be no cancer immunotherapy, no anti-overdose medication, no anti-heart attack or stroke medication, no cutting-edge treatments.
If NIH funding is cut, the iceberg will melt. That means fewer cures, more suffering, and more lives lost.
The science beneath the surface keeps us afloat.
Invest in NIH. Invest in life
How do we detect spatially variable genes (SVGs) in spatial transcriptomics?
In our Nature Communications review, we categorize 34 computational methods into three categories:
��� Overall SVGs
✅ Cell-type-specific SVGs
✅ Spatial-domain-marker SVGs
https://t.co/heTI8pCWAi
1/1
Check out our updated #bioRxiv preprint on #bionformatics#Rstats method CRAWDAD (Cell-type Relationship Analysis Workflow Done Across Distances) for quantifying cell-type spatial relationships in #spatialomics data
📰: https://t.co/UMF2d3hetL
💻: https://t.co/132Ug6VQ2Z
I'm glad to share that our ClusterDE paper has been accepted by RECOMB2025. Here is the updated bioRxiv: https://t.co/wlefSIVgIG ClusterDE solves the "double-dipping" issue in both sc and spatial transcriptomics. Thanks to my PhD advisor Jessica @jsb_ucla and other collaborators!
An snRNA-seq atlas of #MultipleSclerosis brains is presented in @NeuroCellPress today by KI professor @GoCasteloBranco and colleagues. Patient-specific glial gene expression patterns stratify MS patients, supporting precision medicine approaches for #MS. https://t.co/ZE8iGnzL6f
In this student-requested video, I demo the process of making a high quality publication-ready figure (from making a mockup to enhancing visual similarity in Illustrator) and narrate my general process.
Follow along 📽️: https://t.co/4uLZFkzDBA
#phdlife#AcademicTwitter#dataviz
Four years after the 2020 Method of the Year (“spatially resolved transcriptomics”), @naturemethods has now nominated “spatial proteomics” as the 2024 Method of the Year.
H/T @RongFan8 (spatial guru!)
It was an absolute dream to help with this Method of the Year! SPATIAL PROTEOMICS gets a well-deserved spotlight! Thanks so much to all the authors who contributed their comments! @RongFan8@BodenmillerLab@leeat_keren@labs_mann @DanielaQuail
How to write a grant?
1. Write it for the reviewer, not you, the applicant.
2. Communicate in stories.
3. Make your story cohesive—leave no puzzling gaps.
4. Make your story resonate to keep the reviewer reading.
5. Accept chance and noise in peer-review.
https://t.co/wHZ065DNlm
The startup is overtaking the academy as the place where most people do science
the vast majority individuals who love science find no harbor or home in the academy, no stable career or livable wage
Today, startups are becoming the New Colossus of science 🗽🧪
Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.
I hope for a day when academia is a warm hearth of safety, stability and curiosity unbounded for more of those seeking to learn and contribute
In the meantime, consider coming to the startup world and get valued to do science that solves problems