Lula's trajectory has so many important lessons for U.S. social democrats that I am all but certain not a single one of them will pay a lick of attention to.
Behold, truly, the limits of technocratic "government will deliver for people," with rhetorically pro-worker characteristics, and little in the way of truly animating or rebuilding working-class institutions on their own terms, and little in the way of disciplining capital.
Fascist international pretty much full ascendant in most of the western hemisphere, and it's going to be sold for parts by the worst people on planet earth to enrich the worst people on planet earth. Cool stuff
Pedro Sánchez will both immediately dissolve parliament tomorrow with snap elections on 29 November and reimplement the tenant protection decrees that parliament voted down on Friday
@grulkon Also true, just as it's true that Zionism also emerged out of conservative statecraft (Benjamin Disraeli) and against reactionary racist ideas of the 19th c (Moses Hess). I'm recounting the dominant 20th c development—taken against better paths—for the sake of simplicity.
Here, I'll explain, no problem: European Jews were an internal colony, and a supremacist colonial project tried to exterminate and expel them. In response, European Jews created a supremacist colonial project called Israel. Zionism is the racist ideology of this dominant history.
I don't like this website, and I don't like the way most people use it. It's not good for political education. It makes no meaningful difference in really existing political life. I can be right a thousand times over about the recurrent political discourse and it means nothing.
A brave Egyptian teenager defies the border barrier to deliver bread to starving Palestinians in Gaza.
“I delivered 1,000 loaves of bread to the Palestinians,” he says.
"Anti-racism is full-fledged support for ideologies that justify total state segregation based on race, culture, religion, creed, and shared identity" is not the liberal pluralistic argument that many think it is, lmao.
You don't want to have a struggle session with me over the "right opinion," or over whether I've held it with fidelity, or over my ability to out-argue you, I promise.
I suppose for people who are trying to figure out what they think day-to-day there's some use in skirmishing about the news, but not for me, sorry to say.