💼KyleB

Financial Professional/Content Creator/ Conservative from Palm Springs

[💼KyleB @realKylebryan]

@BovadaOfficial Terrible.

Down for an hour 😖

Biggest sports day of the summer and @BovadaOfficial 💩 the bed

😔

Bovada out of business after gambling is legalized soon.

[💼KyleB @realKylebryan]

#collegefootball27 is terrible beyond belief.

[💼KyleB @realKylebryan]

@EASPORTSCollege 27 has got to be the worst sports game I’ve ever played

Extra point field goals are glitched and miss about 40% of time.

HB toss throws ball to the lineman 15% of the time

Ultimate Team has so many flaws.
-Won’t load rewards
-Give loss even though Won

[The Rubber Duck ™ @TheRubberDuck79]

on June 3, 2019 - Julian Assange explained that the Russia Hoax of 2016 was a brilliant Hillary Clinton strategy because she used the [soros] media to project the crimes she was guilty of onto Donald Trump, as it was Clinton that had the connections to Russia - not Trump.

[💼KyleB @realKylebryan]

Haaland 🇳🇴 will become more famous and a better soccer player than Ronaldo 🇵🇹

[💼KyleB @realKylebryan]

@CovinoandRich

Love you guys but

Tom Hanks is not lovable by everyone.

There is huge amount of evidence he is linked to child trafficking.

(His post of children clothes for years)

There is reason Tom left USA to Greece.

[💼KyleB @realKylebryan]

Who has watched the World Cup

and thinks..

I’d rather watch baseball ⚾️?
(17 guys stand around watching another guy swing a stick) 😑

[💼KyleB @realKylebryan]

@GEICO Insurance has terrible service.

Good luck finding a phone number to talk to someone.

[RahRahBooHiss @HissRah]

@bennyjohnson 500+ Chinese companies gung ho for the CCP.

@TPostMillennial
https://t.co/1n8QzZFhG0

[🇺🇸 Edward T. Winslow @EdwardTWinz]

CLARENCE THOMAS JUST PUBLISHED THE EXACT ARGUMENT FOR WHY THE SUPREME COURT'S BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP RULING IS CONSTITUTIONALLY WRONG

Not a political objection. Not a policy disagreement. NAMED HISTORY. SPECIFIC TEXT. Amendment by amendment.

📜 14th Amendment, 1868 — "ONE pervading purpose": securing equal citizenship for FREED SLAVES after the Civil War
📜 Reconstruction Congress intent — zero evidence the drafters contemplated children of foreign temporary visitors or illegal aliens
📜 "Subject to the jurisdiction" clause — Thomas: means full political allegiance, not mere physical presence on US soil
📜 The majority opinion — Thomas says it REPURPOSED the Amendment to protect preferred rights the drafters NEVER contemplated
📜 Thomas's direct quote — those rights "CANNOT find support in the text today"
📜 His warning on the ruling — "I am not sure that today's opinion will stand the test of time"
📜 Thomas during April 2026 oral arguments — probed whether immigration debates even existed when the 14th was written
📜 His core distinction — freed slaves were entitled to citizenship because they were Americans with no other homeland; children of foreign nationals are not in the same category
📜 Roberts and Barrett — joined the liberal bloc in the 6-3 majority in Trump v. Barbara
📜 Gorsuch — joined Thomas in dissent; Alito filed a separate dissent

💀 91 pages
💀 1 purpose the 14th Amendment actually had, per Thomas
💀 ZERO rights the Reconstruction Congress contemplated for children of foreign nationals
💀 100% of Thomas's argument grounded in the specific post-Civil War historical record — not modern policy preference

Every argument on this list is anchored in the text and history of the Amendment. Not in what the Court wishes it said. In what the people who wrote it actually intended.

The Court's ruling stands. But Thomas put a 91-page marker on the record.

Thomas's dissent is still ticking. These are the arguments at the core of it.

I'll keep you updated as this unfolds, turn on notifications this is EXTREMELY important.

[💼KyleB @realKylebryan]

@jenncorb @GigaBeers @SenWhitehouse so then its still alleged? lol

[Eric Spracklen 🇺🇸 @EricSpracklen]

📉FLORIDA REAL ESTATE CRASH📉

3BR, 3BA, 2,600sqft home purchased in 2024 for $902,279

Sellers listed in early 2025 at $1,200,000

Then they reduced the price NUMEROUS times throughout 2025-2026.

A $55,000 PRICE CUT AGAIN TODAY.

For sale now at $789,000 and still not worth it.

[Amy Reichert @amyforsandiego]

9-0. The Supreme Court just made it unanimous: Girls’ sports are based on biological sex, not feelings.

[Andrew Kolvet @AndrewKolvet]

Official transcript from the US Senate on May 30, 1866. Senator Jacob Howard, who introduced the 14th Amendment:

"This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens...”

SCOTUS got this ruling 100% wrong. A total travesty.

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

But the true legal fight comes down to this phrase: "subject to the jurisdiction."

The Constitution says a citizen is someone born here and "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States.

EVERYTHING turns on what those words mean.

The Court reads them loosely, to mean something like "anyone who has to obey our laws while they're standing on our soil," which would include almost everybody, tourists included.

Thomas reads them to mean something much stronger: someone who is FULLY under America's authority and FULLY loyal to America, with no competing loyalty to another country.

To show he's not just making this up, he points to three groups that everyone has always agreed were left out of citizenship: the children of foreign ambassadors, the children of enemy soldiers occupying American land, and Native Americans living under their own tribal governments.

Why were all three left out?

Because none of them were fully under U.S. control.

They each answered to some OTHER authority.

In his words: "Children born to diplomats, hostile alien occupiers, and Indians in tribes were not citizens because they were not subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States. For the same reason, the children of foreign temporary visitors, who were also not subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States, were also not citizens."

Thomas says a tourist's baby fits the same pattern because the baby and the parents are still tied to another country.

So the same logic that excludes those three groups, he argues, should exclude the visitor's child too.

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

The wording was chosen carefully, on purpose, to leave certain people out.

Before the rule went into the Constitution, there was an earlier version of it: a law passed in 1866.

And the people who wrote that law picked their words VERY DELIBERATELY to make sure the children of temporary visitors would NOT be included.

The senator who led the effort said it about as plainly as a person can: people who are only here for a short time are folks "we would have no right to make citizens," and that includes their kids.

He even worried that a looser wording might accidentally scoop those families in, so he tightened it on purpose to keep them out.

Thomas's point is that when the rule later went into the Constitution itself, it carried that EXACT SAME INTENTION.

The fancier constitutional language was meant to do the same job the 1866 law did.

[War Correspondent @warDaniel47]

🚨 WOW! Elon Musk just resurfaced this video of Chuck Schumer in 1996 saying that "the NUMBER ONE REASON" migrants come to America is to commit fraud and steal taxpayer dollars

"They can get benefits against the law because of FRAUD!"

ELON: "That’s what he said."

We need to pass the SAVE America Act so they CAN'T VOTE.

[Senator Rand Paul @SenRandPaul]

Upset with the SCOTUS decision today?

Call your senator at [phone] and tell them to support my Constitutional Amendment to end Birthright Citizenship. We must protect the integrity of American citizenship.

[zerohedge @zerohedge]

San Francisco Archdiocese Agrees To $395 Million Abuse Settlement https://t.co/ngpiftDM6m

[💼KyleB @realKylebryan]

You should’nt be allowed to use EBT to buy Candy 🍬 or Soda 🥤

You can argue with a wall