@Shawn_Farash Reasonable firearms restrictions DO work.
2025 mass shootings Australia = 2
(adjusted for population to compare with U.S. = 24)
2025 mass shootings U.K. = 3
(adjusted for population to compare with U.S. = 15)
2025 mass shootings U.S. = 391
Reasonable firearms restrictions DO work.
2025 mass shootings Australia = 2
(adjusted for population to compare with U.S. = 24)
2025 mass shootings U.K. = 3
(adjusted for population to compare with U.S. = 15)
2025 mass shootings U.S. = 391
Since the Left is revving up the Gun Control propaganda machine, I'd like to ask just one thing:
If "Gun Control" worked, why didn't it stop the terrorist attack in Australia?
Let's start there, shall we?
@HomanNews The truth is that ICE agents are committing vicious assaults, batteries and kidnappings on US citizens (including peaceful protesters) hardworking immigrant mothers and fathers, and children. Any real patriot should be demanding a stop to it.
The truth is that ICE agents are committing vicious assaults, batteries and kidnappings on US citizens (including peaceful protesters) hardworking immigrant mothers and fathers, and children. Any real patriot should be demanding a stop to it.
🚨 Tom Homan issues a direct plea:
“I’m asking politicians, governors, and mayors — STOP going after ICE and Border Patrol.”
“These men and women are PATRIOTS. Period.”
Amen to that. 🇺🇸
The way our agents have been treated is beyond unacceptable.
Do you agree?
Firearms are not banned in Australia, although they do have common sense restrictions which, under Heller, would not be inconsistent with the 2nd Amendment in the U.S. As a result, while the U.S. has had 391 mass shootings in 2025, Australia has had 2.
@BasedMikeLee Firearms are not banned in Australia, although they do have common sense restrictions which, under Heller, would not be inconsistent with the 2nd Amendment in the U.S. As a result, while the U.S. has had 391 mass shootings in 2025, Australia has had 2.
🚨Rolling Stone is now confirming what we all knew happened with Jimmy Kimmel’s show. According to their reporting, executives at ABC and Disney didn’t think Kimmel said anything outrageous but they feared retaliation from Trump. This is a blatant attack on free speech.
In the hours leading up to the decision to pull Jimmy Kimmel, two sources familiar with the matter say, senior executives at ABC, its owner Disney, and affiliates convened emergency meetings to figure out how to minimize the damage. Multiple execs felt that Kimmel had not actually said anything over the line, the two sources say, but the threat of Trump administration retaliation loomed.
Details: https://t.co/K0skxF5hGo
@tedcruz@Newsweek Jimmy Kimmel was indefinitely suspended for making a suggestion about the motivation of Kirk’s killer. I suggest all social media apply the same treatment to you for committing the same “offense.”
Jimmy Kimmel was indefinitely suspended for making a suggestion about the motivation of Kirk’s killer. I suggest all social media apply the same treatment to you for committing the same “offense.”
CRUZ: “[Charlie] was assassinated for speaking the truth, for sharing his heartfelt beliefs, for daring to open conversations across the political spectrum.”
My latest for @Newsweek: https://t.co/KRIZyIjMuP
@LauraLoomer I assume they realized that Omar’s saying the murder was “really mortifying” and her empathizing with Kirk’s family could not by any stretch of the iMAGAnation warrant censure, and that the only bases for Mace’s resolution were politics, hatred and racism.
I assume they realized that Omar’s saying the murder was “really mortifying” and her empathizing with Kirk’s family could not by any stretch of the iMAGAnation warrant censure, and that the only bases for Mace’s resolution were politics, hatred and racism.
@badhombre@RepMcClintock@USRepMikeFlood@RepJeffHurd@RepMillsPress I assume they realized that Omar’s saying the murder was “really mortifying” and her empathizing with Kirk’s family could not by any stretch of the iMAGAnation, be construed as “mocking” his death, and that the only bases for Mace’s resolution were politics, hatred and racism.
I assume they realized that Omar’s saying the murder was “really mortifying” and her empathizing with Kirk’s family could not by any stretch of the iMAGAnation, be construed as “mocking” his death, and that the only bases for Mace’s resolution were politics, hatred and racism.
Here are the four weak Republicans who joined Democrats to protect Ilhan Omar from being censured and stripped of her committee assignments for mocking Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
@RepMcClintock@usrepmikeflood@RepJeffHurd@RepMillsPress
America is meant to be a bastion of free speech.
Everybody across the political spectrum should be speaking out to stop what’s happening to Jimmy Kimmel.
This is about protecting democracy.
This must go to court.
Kimmel.
Colbert.
Suits against the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and 60 Minutes.
Extorting settlements from CBS, ABC, and others.
Blocking the AP's access to the White House.
This administration is responsible for the most blatant attacks on the free press in American history.
What will be left of the First Amendment when he’s done?
@StephenM Gun violence was the evil that took Charlie Kirk’s life. And while his death is as tragic as those of schoolchildren murdered by firearms, he was NOT a champion of American values and ideals. Just like you, Miller, he was aggressively working to undermine them.
Gun violence was the evil that took Charlie Kirk’s life. And while his death is as tragic as those of schoolchildren murdered by firearms, he was NOT a champion of American values and ideals. Just like you, Miller, he was aggressively working to undermine them.
Our hearts are shattered. America has lost one of its greatest champions. A loving family has lost the most extraordinary husband and father. All of us must now dedicate ourselves to defeating the evil that stole Charlie from this world.
Deplorable. Trump, Noem and Homan are engaged in an ongoing criminal conspiracy of violating civil rights, and the assault and battery of Sen. Padilla for engaging in free speech is one of the most outrageous examples of that. The courts must stop this lawless administration.