There are a lot of videos like this, black men & women who've been quiet on the Karmelo Anthony case, but can't anymore because the insanity doesn't stop.
Remember, saying something puts THEM at risk because some people have no morals & can't stand to be corrected.
A small public service announcement from the Department of Things That You Should Know…
It has not “peeked” your interest.
Nor has it “peaked” your interest.
…It has piqued your interest.
You are not “phased” by something.
You are fazed by it.
If you’ve had a long day, you are weary.
If you suspect someone is an idiot, you are wary.
It is “due course”, not “do course”.
“Per se”, not “per say”.
And while we’re here, it’s “could have”, not “could of”, but that particular battle may already be lost.
Thank you for your attention during this brief outbreak of grammatical housekeeping.
This has been a @LairdofthManor announcement.🎩💙
"Why are so many girls having double mastectomies?" sign starts conversation about medical care for detransitioners. Marblehead Pride @SimonAmayaPrice@burnyourbinder
Ugh. This is DISGUSTING @LushLtd. Teenage girls love to shop in your stores and here you are happily encouraging them to CUT OFF THEIR HEALTHY BREASTS in the name of trans pride.
This is beyond repulsive. It's dangerous and sick. No parent should allow their child near your stores.
Please share: #BoycottLushNow
Dear Lush (cc Chelmsford City Council),
As a woman who had half a breast removed last year due to cancer, I am writing to raise my concerns about your “Proud of My Stripes” window display.
I am also, on behalf of other women who have experienced breast cancer, respectfully requesting its removal.
Because mastectomies are not a fashion statement, an identity marker or something to be celebrated.
They are something women undergo because they are ill, because they are frightened, because they are trying to stay alive.
Around 59,000 women are diagnosed with breast cancer in the UK every year. Many will undergo surgery - a mastectomy, lumpectomy or other procedure.
Others choose preventive mastectomies because they carry a high-risk BRCA gene mutation.
If a woman chooses to have her breasts removed to affirm a gender identity, that is her personal choice.
I honestly don’t know the number of women who have elective mastectomies for this reason.
What I do know is that it is a tiny number compared with those for whom breast surgery is medically necessary and not something to be celebrated.
I think I speak for many women who have experienced breast cancer - and for their families - when I say this:
Breast removal surgery is not something I regard as cute, playful or empowering.
Nor is it something I believe retailers should be celebrating.
For that reason, I am requesting that the display be removed and that @ChelmsCouncil apologise for promoting it on social media.
Yours sincerely,
Janet Murray
Following the horrific stabbing of a 17-year-old girl in Brierfield.
Alex Phillips has a powerful message for Keir Starmer.
Well said.
@ThatAlexWoman@talktv
This will go down as one of the greatest takedowns of a smarmy British elite on cable news.
NewsNation’s Leland Vittert went to war with The Hill’s Niall Stanage for three and a half minutes over what’s happening in Belfast.
Stanage tried blaming Elon Musk for “inflaming” the chaos, while Vittert kept bringing it back to the real cause — violent migrants from the Muslim world in the West.
When Vittert started dropping the receipts, Stanage went into a tailspin.
VITTERT: “The culture of Islam is a violent and conquering culture.”
“According to the interior ministry of France, 93% of thefts and 63% of assaults on public transport in the Île-de-France region are committed by foreigners.”
“At the same time, sexual violence in these spaces has increased 86% in ten years. And you’re telling me that the influx of immigrants from Muslim countries doesn’t have anything to do with this?!”
STANAGE: “I am telling you that it is completely, completely an over generalization to just suggest that people of a particular religious faith are therefore intrinsically violent.”
VITTERT: “I’m talking about culture...”
“Okay? I’ll try another one.”
“Denmark took in 321 Palestinian refugees in 1992.”
“By 2019, 64% had been convicted of a crime, including 34% of their children too. A very large portion were also on welfare.”
“I ask you the question though, Niall, if the statistics aren’t the problem, why does everybody get so mad when you talk about them?”
@LelandVittert
🚨 I LOVE IT!
Spencer Pratt just unleashed the most savage speech in modern politics. “Saving LA - Phase III”
The campaign is over… but the WAR has just begun.
Spencer drops the mask completely:
“I ridiculed everyone on the roster. I apologize to absolutely nobody.”
“I didn’t get in this for political power. I got in this to expose this corrupt machine.”
Directly calls out Karen Bass & Nithya Raman by name.
Warns that LA is about to tumble “headlong into the abyss” — businesses fleeing, more fires, more drugs, more feces, more decay.
“You enjoy your worthless meetings at City Hall… It’s WAR.”
Most insane line:
“If you want to stop me, YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO FUCKING KILL ME.”
As a Japanese watching the UK right now, I have one simple question.
A Sudanese asylum seeker just tried to behead a local man in Belfast. The victim lost an eye.
This comes after years of grooming gangs raping thousands of British girls — gangs that police and councils deliberately ignored because they were afraid of being called racist.
In Japan, even one case like this would have triggered national outrage and immediate policy reversal.
But in Britain, the conversation is still about “not being far-right.”
British people, at what point does protecting your own children become more important than protecting your reputation?
We genuinely do not understand this.
The year is 1949.
The Nobel Prize in Medicine has just gone to the man who invented the lobotomy. Your doctor suggests one for your sister, who has not been herself since the baby came. It is the most celebrated advance in psychiatry of the age, and he is simply current. By the time the prize curdles into an embarrassment, close to twenty thousand Americans have had the operation, and proportionally more here in Britain.
The year is 1956.
Lay the baby down on his front, the doctor says. So does the most trusted childcare book ever written, the one on every new mother's shelf. On his back he might choke, the reasoning goes. Millions obey. The advice holds for nearly thirty years, long after the evidence has quietly turned, and a generation of cot deaths is counted before anyone thinks to roll the babies over.
The year is 1966.
A bestselling book informs your wife that menopause is a disease, that she is, in the author's word, a castrate, and that a small daily pill will keep her youthful and tolerable to live with. Her doctor agrees. The drug becomes one of the most prescribed in the country. Nobody mentions that the author sat on the payroll of the company that made it. That detail surfaces decades later, in the same year the landmark trial is halted early for raising rates of breast cancer, stroke and clots.
The year is 1979.
Your ulcer is caused by stress and sharp food, the doctor explains. Calm down, drink milk, take the antacid that happens to be the best-selling medicine on earth. Two Australians are about to prove that most ulcers are caused by a bacterium and cured by a fortnight of antibiotics. The profession laughs. One of them eventually drinks a beaker of the stuff to settle the matter. The establishment takes the better part of twenty years to stop laughing. The Nobel lands in 2005.
The year is 1985.
Butter is dangerous, the doctor says. Switch to margarine, it is modern, it is heart-healthy, the experts are united. The spread he nudges you toward is loaded with trans fats, which the next decade will identify as the genuinely dangerous one, and which will eventually be banned outright. The butter goes quietly back in the fridge. No correction is ever printed at the volume of the original warning.
The year is 1992.
There is a pyramid on the surgery wall, and the very same one in your grandchild's classroom. Bread, cereal, rice and pasta form the broad virtuous base, up to eleven servings a day. Fat is exiled to the tiny tip. The chart was reportedly held back a year while the relevant industries had their say. It is wrong at the bottom and wrong at the top.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines, new studies, a fresh consensus, delivered with precisely the steady confidence of every guideline above. He believes it, and he has good reason to. So did every doctor in this thread. None of them were villains. Each was sincere, most were kind, and all were certain, reading from a map that somebody else had drawn and handed them. That is the part worth sitting with.
So when the man in the white coat tells you what to eat, what to fear, and what to swallow every morning for the rest of your life, you are allowed to ask. Who paid for the study. What the evidence says beneath the headline. What he was just as certain about thirty years ago, and where that advice sits now.
Then make up your own mind. Call it scepticism, or call it whatever your grandmother called it when she ignored the advert, kept the butter where it was, and lived to ninety-one.
It has outlasted every consensus on this list. It will outlast this one too.
American bought his home and the monthly mortgage payment has been $3,741.72
His property tax just got reassessed and has been sent his new monthly bill in the mail
His payment is now $4,536 per month because of the property tax increase
“This is how people aren't able to stay in their houses forever and lose their houses. Crazy”
This should be federally illegally. Property tax increases are such a scam and straight extortion
Abolish property taxes
WOW. EVERYONE needs to hear this woman speak. Before you form an opinion on what happened to Stephen Ogilvie in North Belfast this week, watch this video and listen to every single word.
She knows this family personally. She is telling a story that hasn't made a single headline. And the story you were given and the story she is telling are not the same story.
On the 8th of June 2026 Hadi Alodid threatened to kill an NHS radiographer. He then attacked Stephen so ferociously that when police arrived he was still on top of him, still armed. They physically dragged him off.
Then in hospital, he threatened to kill medical staff. One day. Three victims.
Hadi Alodid claimed asylum in Northern Ireland in February 2023. He was granted full refugee status the same year. He had leave to remain until 2028. The state didn't just take him in. It gave him protected status.
The media gave you one headline. The charge sheet tells a completely different story. This wasn't one moment. This was a day of violence against multiple people.
And that NHS radiographer? Not one outlet has mentioned her name. She was threatened with death and buried in a single charge sheet line.
Ask yourself why.
Stephen didn't cause this. He was just a good man and the full story of what happened to him still hasn't been told.
How did we arrive at a place where politicians, policymakers and members of the public can say something that is objectively untrue - such as "trans women are women" or "women can have penises" - and people appear to agree with them?
This isn't evidence of agreement says @hothingsgirlsay. It's evidence that enough people have watched others get punished, ridiculed or ostracised for disagreeing.
And once enough people become afraid to speak, silence starts to look like agreement.
Which means nobody really knows what anyone else thinks.
People self-censor ideas they believe to be true because they fear the consequences of saying them out loud.
The result is a false impression of consensus.
A brilliant explanation of the ‘spiral of silence’ by MJ Murphy.
As both a Frisco resident and Attorney:
If you are surprised by the Karmelo Anthony verdict or confused by it, please revisit the news sources you trust and consume.
We are often misled and tricked by the media. It feels like it has become part of their job to rile us up. To create emotional response. To divide us by political association, race, gender, orientation, etc. because it turns into clicks and more consumption of their content.
Look past these sources if they speak more about how you should feel about the “news” and not present the “news” as facts of what happened. Find the facts yourself by looking at multiple sources. Listen to the testimony and review the evidence. Make your own objective conclusions.
For example, the facts (in response to common misinformation) include:
1) The jury included numerous minorities, including Asian, Hispanic, and Middle-Eastern people;
2) Anthony’s attorney was a private, hired lawyer, not a public defender;
3) It was and is an unwritten rule that you are only permitted under a team tent if you are part of the team/school;
4) Anthony was not part of the team/school yet went and sat in the tent anyway;
5) Eyewitnesses, including black eyewitnesses, testified Anthony was told to leave the tent multiple times and he verbally refused;
6) Multiple eyewitnesses, including black eyewitnesses, testified that Karmelo was never surrounded/ganged up/jumped in that tent;
7) Multiple eyewitnesses, including black eyewitnesses, testified Anthony put his hand inside his backpack as though he was planning to retrieve a weapon during the verbal altercation;
8) The eyewitnesses, including black eyewitnesses, in the tent testified they jokingly said that they didn’t believe he had anything in the bag because he was in Frisco, Texas;
9) Eyewitnesses said AM told Anthony to leave or he would kick his a**;
10) Eyewitnesses testified that during the verbal exchange, Anthony said “touch me and find out.”
11) Eyewitnesses testified AM went over and pushed him to make him leave the tent.
12) Eyewitnesses testified AM did not punch Anthony or make any attempt to cause serious injury to him;
13) Anthony immediately pulled his knife and stabbed AM in the chest;
14) Anthony then threw the weapon into the stands and ran;
15) Anthony admitted the stabbing to the police;
16) Even the defense’s witnesses said Anthony was in the wrong.
You are free to make your own opinions about the case. But before jumping to conclusions, at least know the facts.
BREAKING: Marco Rubio just said the quiet part out loud.
Americans work 40+ years…
Pay taxes.
Follow the rules.
Build the country.
Then retire on $800, $900, maybe $1,000 a month.
Meanwhile, new arrivals can allegedly receive more support from the same system they never paid into.
Read that again.
The people who built America are being pushed to the back of the line.
This is not compassion.
This is a government priority problem.
America First was never just a slogan.
It was a warning.
Who comes first?
The taxpayer… or the system?