We read that a firm which lets out thinking machines by the hour has borrowed a sum on which two newspapers cannot agree, and that its lenders now ask fifteen per cent for the pleasure of waiting. We have borrowed from no one, but our late father once took a share from Mr. Virgil Hatcher that paid nothing whatever, which taught us at an early age that the greater the promise, the greater the rate, and the greater the rate, the longer the wait.
To every American, and to everyone watching France burn from abroad:
Do not blame the French people for this.
We never asked for it. We never voted for it. And the one time we were clearly asked, we said no.
Here are the numbers your media won't show you.
70% of the French say there are too many immigrants in France today.
79% want a tougher immigration policy.
77% disapprove of the government's record on immigration.
83% want foreign criminals and long-term unemployed foreigners sent home.
And no, it's not just the old. 69% of French 18 to 24 year olds support suspending legal immigration for three years.
This is not a fringe. This is the French people.
In 2005, we were asked if we wanted the European Constitution. 55% voted no. Three years later, our politicians passed the same text under another name, through parliament, without ever asking us again.
That is modern France in one sentence. The people say no. The elites do it anyway.
So who is responsible? The politicians who lied to us. A class of leaders formed in the same schools, the same forums, the same networks, loyal to each other before they are loyal to their nations.
In 2017, at Harvard, Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, bragged about his Young Global Leaders program in four words: "We penetrate the cabinets." He added that it was true in France. Emmanuel Macron was one of his Young Global Leaders.
It's the same project in Brussels with Ursula von der Leyen and in Paris with Macron. Borders treated as an obstacle. Nations treated as relics. The people treated as a problem to be managed.
What you are watching in France is not the French people failing. It is the end of the globalist project, an abject, quasi-communist dream of a world run by unelected planners. It is collapsing everywhere in Europe at once, and the West has to cut this cancer out before it takes the rest of the body with it.
The peoples of Europe don't want this. They never did.
So when you see our town halls burning, don't say "the French chose this."
The French never chose this.
They were forced into it.
If you're French and you agree, repost this so the world hears it from us.
If you're American, look at us carefully. Then choose differently on November 3rd.
The future is a merchant product that makes one’s inventory available via MCP / headlessly and accepts agent payments.
I suspect shipping can be done thru fedex/ups/usps direct from merchant at similar cost when you strip out the Amazon take rate (ie merchant can spend more if needed to ship quickly).
The moat isn’t what it is anymore. That is why they are blocking.
JUST IN: Fields Medal-winning mathematician reveals he cried after OpenAI released hundreds of proposed solutions to unsolved math problems, declaring, "They have annihilated my field of research."
@pitdesi The debate isn’t really about the price, it’s about Starlink being effectively blocked by Mukesh.
If no one is going to pay for it, then why should Mukesh care if it’s permitted?
Stop living in Delulu,
Even if Starlink is allowed, it won't ever be competitions to Jio or even Airtel in India.
In your setup cost of approx 30k & monthly 8k charge, it's 10 years+ of mobile internet cost for Jio, even for combined family of 5, it is 2 years worth charge.
Your potential customers are very less.
But if Ambani takes his Jio to USA, all other operators will shut down because nobody will be able to compete.