Define “war of aggression.” You’re assuming every military strike requires a declaration or authorization from Congress. It doesn’t.
Establish that this operation is a “war” in the constitutional sense rather than a limited Article II use of force.
War creates a risk of death and ordinarily involves organized violence, but death is not logically necessary for something to constitute an armed conflict or war. Wars and armed conflict have happened absent death, or causalities even.
Nobody said shit about immigration, either. Learn to think, pendejo.
@JulianeWriter@BrianRoemmele Define the surveillance you’re objecting to. What is being collected, about whom, for how long, how is it being linked to identifiable people, and what makes that use illegitimate rather than routine government observation?
America has lost much of its grind mentality. More productive work means more output. More output means more goods and services, more income, and a larger tax base. You can redistribute income, but you can’t redistribute goods and services that nobody produced.
A three day workweek only works if productivity per hour rises enough to offset the lost labor hours. It’s not a secret.
@GBNT1952@imelizabethlane She thinks playing pretty, pretty princess is the equivalent of picking up a green beret. Wait until she gets old. Nobody will give a fuck what she has to say then, not even the simps and cucks that follow her.
@JulianeWriter@richchetwynd Lol. That wasn’t happening already? Almonds need water. Surveillance doesn’t need AI.
You’re blaming the newest tool for an infrastructure and practice that’s been operating at scale for decades. Even if we accept your argument, how do you plan to stop it? Lay it on us.
@MAGACult2 You’re being warned about something. You don’t believe the warning because the thing you’re being warned about is preventing you from believing the warning. Your disbelief therefore proves the warning. Also, we hate conspiracy theories.
LMAO. The logic, ick. 😂 😬
@AndyBran@piersmorgan These people will have us end the war only to fight it again in a few years, after the enemy has had time to regroup. It’s stupid no matter how you paint ending it now. We should end it when they tap out.
Congress passes unconstitutional laws sometimes is not an argument that this law is unconstitutional. Courts exist precisely to adjudicate that question and routinely divest unconstitutional laws of legal effect. See Marbury vs Madison
Calling war “anti-life” because it kills is like calling surgery anti-life because it also routinely kills. The relevant question is what the destructive act is undertaken to prevent or accomplish. War is as much pro-life as it is anti-life. That’s why humans have fought them since the beginning of history.
There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in what you knowingly expose to public view, including a license plate and a vehicle traveling on public roads. What the government does with that data is another question, and that question is one the courts will need to resolve, but the cameras are not unconstitutional, themselves.
You are a single step thinker, which makes you the moron.
@mindstatex It’s become a symbol of Millennial social status. People need to have a healthier with aging. We all get old. Embrace it. Perpetual youth just looks forced.