@MichaelSFuhrer In an isolated take, maybe. But, this process is not scalable if lots of poor underdeveloped leads are posted all the time. There will be too much noise in which true messages will be easily lost
@MPrinParr@rubenharris@pmarca Exactly!! What technological disruption is in the sweatshop in Bangladesh where clothes are made?
Medical care does not have lots of technology that's constantly updating??
Seriously
@RetroxPGF@Shamburgularara agreed, and as I mentioned in my previous tweet, as you impose further permissions (i.e. checking/ gating credentials). I am not saying it might work or not, I am saying that your protocol seems not to be as permissionless as you stated at the outset
@RetroxPGF@Shamburgularara Interesting set of parameters. But, may I ask, why do you need to have Orcid and the approver?
One, both act as gatekeepers od permission
Two, the review seems to be delegated to a trusted person(s), thus, confounding the direct validation of work
What do you think?