@TuttReal This ain’t just some partisan complaint. This way of speaking totally obscures the intellectual history of German thought from the 1790s to WWII
@TuttReal All of this is embroiled in conflations and reductions that make no sense, and these are redoubled every time someone slings around the term “romantic” as if its meaning were self-evident, as if it designates a whole strain of “anti-Enlightenment” ideology from Jena to the Nazis
@TuttReal An more broadly, Lukacs is a great thinker, but he is absolutely terrible reader of Schelling and of German idealism more broadly. He has an embarrassingly simplistic understanding of romantic irony cribbed from Hegel's irritated remarks.
@TuttReal No, though I'll deal with the issue in the book I'm writing on the legacy of Jena romanticism. Concerning Benjamin, I suggest reading his doctoral dissertation "On the Concept of Criticism in German Romanticism" and perhaps Peter Osborne's Anywhere or Not at All.
My sprawling essay on Elemental History in Peter Zumthor’s architecture and Hölderlin’s poetry has just been published in boundary2 online. Thanks to Arne de Boever and Frédéric Neyrat for their editorial generosity.
https://t.co/dSkov1mtVs
Prospective table of contents for my ongoing book project.
*possibly unfamiliar names are Cheyney Thompson, Joan Mitchell, Jacques Dupin
x complete draft; x- partial draft; - still to write.