optionstrader

[optionstrader @rellimkcaz1]

@MobleyMania @AR_Thompson1008 @tim_stebbins Obviously but Thome left a long time ago. Anymore, with this 'Guards ball' crap, just getting a hit is better than what we often get from the 4 hole

[optionstrader @rellimkcaz1]

@MobleyMania @AR_Thompson1008 @tim_stebbins Who da fook cares?! We just need ducks on the pond. Get them on, get them over, get them in

[optionstrader @rellimkcaz1]

@MobleyMania @AR_Thompson1008 @tim_stebbins Actually Manzardo is the only one of the 3 to be hitting over .200 vs lefties this year

[optionstrader @rellimkcaz1]

@SchwesLand @AR_Thompson1008 @tim_stebbins He's ass against everyone. Manzardo and Lowe can strikeout just as easily as he can. This platoon nonsense is bs

[optionstrader @rellimkcaz1]

@MobleyMania @AR_Thompson1008 @tim_stebbins He's ass against everyone. Manzardo and Lowe can strikeout just as easily as he can. This platoon nonsense is bs

[optionstrader @rellimkcaz1]

@Charlesheier @NICKIMINAJ Official documents? Other than the Bible what documents are there?

[optionstrader @rellimkcaz1]

@MarketMaestro1 Any idea where it bottoms? Should I just cut my losses?

[optionstrader @rellimkcaz1]

@banquetsbetter Good call. It was over $1 today. I'm underwater on some wulf shares that I'm selling CC on

[optionstrader @rellimkcaz1]

@enrichtrades I just blindly followed your call out here. Bought a call on the dip this morning and rode the rip higher. Made $500 on one contract in 14 minutes

[optionstrader @rellimkcaz1]

@BaseballValues Why do they need to trade the comp pick? Why not keep it?

[optionstrader @rellimkcaz1]

@BigCheds Agreed, definitely breaks down barriers. Especially when it's people living here in America and you make an effort to speak their language. 100% of the time you'll get a big smile from them. I can do it in 3 languages but should try to learn a few more.

[optionstrader @rellimkcaz1]

@_CLEology Agree through about your transitive property math

[optionstrader @rellimkcaz1]

@_CLEology *Monday right?

[Urgent Intel @urgentintel]

God Bless America!
I'm mighty proud of that ragged old flag🇺🇸

Johnny Cash gave me the chills.

[Merriam-Webster @MerriamWebster]

Why is it ‘cancelled’ in the U.K. but ‘canceled’ in the U.S.?

Because we gave them that L in 1776.

[optionstrader @rellimkcaz1]

@DisrespectedThe This is why housing prices are so high. Government makes it unnecessarily impossible/expensive to build

[Jake “JBOY” Crain @JakeCrain_]

An open letter to everyone in Seattle:

#usmnt

[optionstrader @rellimkcaz1]

@Lerianis1 @realMaalouf Muslims have not always been the majority. They kill or enslave the native people of the middle east. Islam is barbaric

[Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee]

We make it far too easy for senators in the minority to use the filibuster to kill bills supported by the majority.

The whole idea behind the filibuster has, from the beginning, been to protect and prolong debate—not to cut off debate, forcing the Senate to abandon any bill that doesn’t immediately receive the support of at least 60 senators.

Filibustering is supposed to require far more than opposing cloture.

Especially for bills of exceptional national importance—like the SAVE America Act—senators should be required to hold the floor and speak.

The minute filibustering senators stop doing that, the legislation can and should be passed at a simple-majority threshold.

This is not a radical idea.

This describes what the filibuster is, how it has historically operated, and how it should work today.

Share this message if you agree that the Senate—and the country as a whole—would be well served by a return to this approach.