ICON

CPA

[ICON @reqcpa]

@BishopJacob @TheBrancaShow That's what I thought lol

[ICON @reqcpa]

@fbaredman Low IQ

[ICON @reqcpa]

@queenie4rmnola Regarding what?

[ICON @reqcpa]

@TorraineWalker Irrelevant to the situation

[ICON @reqcpa]

@gapjilreborn Could be true!

[ICON @reqcpa]

@yesfashio @Fr0mAshesRise No, the kid had a gun 🤦

[ICON @reqcpa]

@kangminlee No offence, who ever thinks Chow is guilty just has a low IQ

[ICON @reqcpa]

@WescottAmerica Justified. The kid had a gun. Nothing to do with shoplifting

[ICON @reqcpa]

@Blacksword011 It's not murder, the boy had a gun🤦

[ICON @reqcpa]

@MsPeachesLundy @ItsReddAgainn And now the burden of proof is on you to prove this was NOT self defence. If you can't, then you have to agree that the verdict is just

[ICON @reqcpa]

@rahiemshabazz The kid had a gun 🤦

[ICON @reqcpa]

@RoseyRedd5 The kid had a gun 🤦

[ICON @reqcpa]

@BishopJacob @TheBrancaShow Therefore, the trial was valid and true. Thank you for conceding then

[ICON @reqcpa]

@legallyminded Low IQ. The kid had a gun 🤡

[ICON @reqcpa]

@FruitWeather @BishopJacob @TheBrancaShow Where's the proof? The burden of proof is on you to prove that.

[ICON @reqcpa]

@leaningcrazy @BishopJacob @TheBrancaShow What part of the trail leading up to the virdict was false?

[ICON @reqcpa]

@BishopJacob @TheBrancaShow What part of the trail leading up to the verdict was false?

[ICON @reqcpa]

@BishopJacob @TheBrancaShow Low IQ comment right here. You contradicted your statement when you said "being chased" and "let himself get shot" in the same statement.

[ICON @reqcpa]

@TheTrueZark @jerry_in_japan @shannonsharpeee Doesnt matter. If the boy pulled out a gun, then half of the things youve mentioned is irrelevant