Se tarda una vida entera en construir una reputación.
Pero tan solo 5 minutos en arruinarla.
Vosotros @PlayStation@PlayStationES@PlayStation_jp@PlayStation_LA lo habéis conseguido en un solo tuit.
Llevo desde 1995 en vuestro barco pero se terminó. No volveré a comprar ni una sola consola vuestra jamás y espero que los demás hagan lo mismo.
Sois lo más bajo de entre lo bajo.
Let's say the PS6 is a digital only console (pretty much guaranteed now) and 20yrs after it's release you wanna get a game for the PS6 but they've shut down the store just like they did for the PS3/Vita. What are you going to do?
You can't go to a gamestop, a pawn shop, a flea market, ebay or whatever. This is planned obsolescence in its' final form. PlayStation now has 100% control over how you buy and play a game.
Your boy wanna sell you a game for cheap? Can't do that, gotta buy full price on PSN. Wanna give your boy a game to check out? too bad, he's gotta buy it for $70 on PSN.
This is terrible for videogame preservation and consumer rights
the main reason dragons were real is theyre depicted in like every part of the world and they all basically look the same. You dont have chupcapbras everywhere you dont have wendigos everywhere. you have dragons everywhere
I’m not anti-AI.
I like MRI machines. I like collision avoidance systems in airplanes. I like software that can detect cancer before a doctor can. I like machine vision systems that stop factory workers from getting their hands crushed in hydraulic presses.
That’s what computers are supposed to do.
Cold. Precise. Mechanical.
I don’t need a technology to “express itself.”
The problem started when Silicon Valley decided the machine should paint. The machine should write poetry. The machine should compose symphonies and generate films and imitate the human soul like a skinwalker wearing a beret.
Now every ad, every song, every image online has this faint chemical aftertaste to it. Like the entire culture is being slowly replaced with synthetic substitutes because executives realized audiences consume slop at the same rate they consume art.
And the worst part is they call this “democratizing creativity.”
No. Creativity was already democratized. A guy with a guitar and 3 friends in a garage could make something beautiful. A college kid with a cracked copy of Photoshop could make an album cover that changed someone’s life.
What they actually democratized was content production.
Factories. Throughput. Infinite generation.
A machine can diagnose my low testosterone. Fine.
I just don’t want it writing the eulogy.
El gymbro mamado al novato: sí tío, me quedan 3 series pero nos turnamos sin problema, déjala así y ya la coloco yo
El sojas: no me da la puta gana de turnar, espérate 😭
Here is how the identity works:
American soldiers go abroad and kill people:
"Heroes."
Whatever the politics of the war.
Whatever the facts on the ground.
They are serving.
They are sacrificing.
They must be honored.
People in other countries fight against American soldiers
"Terrorists."
"Insurgents."
"Fanatics."
"They hate freedom."
They are irrational.
They cannot be understood except as a threat to be neutralized.
The possibility that the second group might simply be people defending their homes from a foreign army that crossed an ocean to kill them, this thought cannot be completed within the system.
Because completing that thought requires asking:
What does it mean that we are the foreign army?
And that question, in the American political imagination, does not have a permitted answer.
@Neiluss_ Lo desprotegidos que deja a artistas, los efectos negativos en tu capacidad cognitiva y tu pensamiento crítico, la contaminación, los deep fakes. Personalmente la IA generativa no me parece una herramienta necesaria ni que tenga más beneficios que mierdas de estas