riad saad

Defending the Honor of the Scholars.

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

Allameh AbdulMuhsin al-Abbad rejects Xhemal Jakupi, Semir Veliu al-Makedoni and Abdurrahman al-Albani (Alben Aliu) and a question about Dr. Abdullah al-Bukhari.

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

@Abu_alLayth_ @AbuIyaadSP Why Arafat is doing lessons secretly in Saudi Arabia? Is this disobedience of the rulers? is this the same way of Salman Aodah?

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

@hikmahpubs @DillyHussain88 It’s strange that you are no longer reacting in defense of Saudi Arabia. You didn’t even react when Hani bin Bureik threatened the Saudi state, yet you reacted because an Emirati was “threatened” in Europe??!!

Money: UAE → STC → Hani → Arafat & Kantush & Munir → X

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

@ArrisaalahPubs Writing

But why did you cooperate with him at that time? Could it be that he has now returned to the truth after distancing himself from Arafat and Dr. Bukhari?

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

@1ne_arda @KerxhaliuDrilon @DaarusSunnah @almadani_k Writing

To expose what Arafat’s followers have said or done to create division, with the sole aim of taking leadership of the Salafi da’wah in different countries. This is neither division nor an accusation; it is a reality, and it is a united stand against a great division. Lol

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

@FonsiLoaiza saudi arabia don't get founds from US. in reality the US is getting founds from Saudi Arabia.

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

@joekent16jan19 this is not right, shia use suicide bombs in Pakistan, in Yemen and Saudi Arabia. The first suicide bombs in history are hashashins a sect from shia. they are like templars on kristianity

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

@DaarusSunnah @hikmahpubs assalamun alaikum
please can you ask him, why he is aligned with rebels in Yemen, with people that want to separate Yemen into 2 states, one for rebles and one for houthis?

and why he is against sh abu Iyaad?

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

Stop living under the shadow of Arafat and Dr. Bukhari.

[Abu Iyaad @AbuIyaadSP]

📘FREE EBOOK

“Repelling the Accusation of Irjāʾ from the Scholars of Ahl Al-Sunnah”

This is a book from 2014 refuting the doubts of an extreme wave of Ḥaddādīs regarding Irjāʾ (PDF, 174 pages).

Book details:
https://t.co/JQcITIfyM2

Direct download:
https://t.co/Zrmq8Wg5QK

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

@ajassimanwar @MuneebSomali https://t.co/syszH55ON2

https://t.co/HF3HRxPU6S

here are his friends : https://t.co/iScH98AiNU

[Dār as-Sunnah @Dar_asSunnah]

﷽  🆕 ʿArafāt-Files @Arafatbinhassan

Below we present an audio recording of Abū Ḥakīm Bilāl Davis @AbuHakeemBilal from 09.11.2021.

This audio recording is of particular significance because Abū Ḥakīm Bilāl Davis @AbuHakeemBilal accurately recognized the situation at the very early stages of the deliberate fitnah initiated by ʿArafāt al-Muḥammadī @Arafatbinhassan and his followers worldwide, and despite its brevity, summarized the entire matter with remarkable clarity :

“Kulluhū kaḏib – It is all lies.”

This made it clear from the outset that the accusations directed against Šayḫ Dr. Abū ʿIyāḍ حفظه الله @AbuIyaadSP were baseless and brazenly fabricated claims, for which no credible evidence has been produced to this day.

What is particularly noteworthy is that the fanatically deluded followers of ʿArafāt al-Muḥammadī @Arafatbinhassan continue to cling to these original allegations and still attempt to use them as the foundation for their attacks.

In doing so, they selectively quote isolated statements of Šayḫ Dr. Abū ʿIyāḍ حفظه الله, @AbuIyaadSP while taking them completely out of context and deliberately ignoring his full explanations and the actual meaning of those statements within their proper context.

Instead of engaging in a fair and scholarly examination, the fanatical followers of ʿArafāt al-Muḥammadī @Arafatbinhassan , whether in the Netherlands, Albania, Macedonia, Switzerland, the United States, India, Germany, or elsewhere, continue to cling to these original and deceitful allegations, allegations for which repentance is required.

Years later, the very same pattern remains unchanged : ʿArafāt’s @Arafatbinhassan fabricated LIES continue to be repeated on a regular basis, yet the requested evidence never materializes.

⚠️ Attempting to transform unsubstantiated allegations into reality through constant repetition does not replace evidence, nor does it constitute a sincere engagement with the truth. (PART2👇🏽)

@AbuKhadeejahSP @troidorg
@AbuIdrees @AbdullahJallow9
@Abdulilah_UK @shnizar_hashim
@kashif
@SalafiPubs
@uwaysT

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

@DScPvTlY5Dzj26M Fuad Zintani is aligned with rebel fractions against Haftar.

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

@hikmahpubs what about Hisham al-Bili accusing Shaykh Albani with irjā ?!

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

Munir Saadi the Mufti of STC, is a jahil who attacked Shaykh Rabi because of Hani, and he is the one who said : " We dont take the judge verdicts on Saudi." Shaykh Sulayman is the one who defended Shaykh Rabee the most before and after He died.

[Zubayr ʿAbbāsī @ZubayrAbbasi]

The Peculiar Case of Shaykh Sulaymān Ar-Ruḥaylī

Shaykh Munīr As-Saʿdī (may Allāh preserve him) was asked:

Question: As-Salāmu ʿAlaykum. Should I refrain from sharing knowledge from Sulaymān Ar-Ruḥaylī?

Answer: Wa ʿAlaykum As-Salām wa Raḥmatullāhi wa Barakātuh.

This man's affair is peculiar, and among the peculiar aspects of his conduct are:

1- A lack of clarity, and the use of broad and ambiguous statements that confuse some youth and leave them uncertain and perplexed.

2- He praises and recommends individuals who have been criticised, despite knowing that they have been criticised by the senior scholars who specialise in evaluating individuals, sects, and groups.

3- He involves himself in matters of Fitan after the senior scholars have already clarified them, presenting himself to the people as a reformer and someone striving to resolve the issue. As a result, the Fitnah may have become prolonged for many youth because of this involvement. He then promises to give his opinion at the end, as though the Salafis are waiting for his verdict.

4- When he expressed to Shaykh Rabīʿ his desire to bring about reconciliation, and Shaykh Rabīʿ supported him in that, he concealed two important matters.

They are:

The first: Shaykh Rabīʿ (may Allah preserve him) stipulated that Ibn Hādī must retract his errors and publicly announce that retraction.

The second: The statement of Shaykh ʿAbdul-Muʿṭī Ar-Ruḥaylī to him: “I speak to you on behalf of my brothers: we are with you in pursuing reconciliation.”

5- Another peculiar aspect of his conduct is that when he expressed his desire for reconciliation, and reconciliation is indeed something good, and we all welcomed it, it should have been reconciliation accompanied by the erring party returning from his mistakes.

Unfortunately, we did not see any sign of that from Shaykh Sulaymān. Rather, we saw him publicly praising one side with praise that reached the level of exaggeration, while privately criticising the other side, as Ashraf Bayyūmī reported several criticisms from him.

6- Another peculiar aspect of his conduct is that during the Fitnah involving Ibrāhīm Ar-Ruḥaylī, he described Muḥammad ibn Hādī as “one of the students of knowledge.”
Yet now, in this Fitnah, after Muḥammad ibn Hādī has slandered a Muslim, attacked students of knowledge, and made disparaging remarks and insinuations regarding senior scholars, Shaykh Sulaymān describes him as: “A scholar, a muḥaddith, a mujāhid, and a patient man.”

Meaning, when Ibn Hādī spoke against his cousin, he was merely described as “one of the students of knowledge.”
But when he directed his attacks towards Rabīʿ, ʿUbayd, and their students, he suddenly became “the scholar, the mujāhid, and the patient one.”!!!

And Allāh's help is sought.

Link: https://t.co/GVNmLozenT

Date: 14 Nov 2018

Translation: Zubayr ʿAbbāsī

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

@ignoreNoverride @AbuIyaadSP sh @AbuIyaadSP does not slander Allamah Fawzan, Abbad, Salih alu Shaykh, Nasir Faqihi, Salih es-Suhaymee, Abdurrazaq al-Badr and others from Kibars. in opposite Arafat Gangs the New Haddadiyah

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

@ignoreNoverride brother , it was not a problem of contagion, vaccine, covid.... and other fake accusations. the problem it was that @AbuIyaadSP was not surrender to Arafat el-Kedhab and sh. Bukhari. Saying that Arafat and sh Bukhari are the head of jarh and tadeel, the head of salafiyyah

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

@Tmusaafir @Mustafa_George By now, all the Salafis have understood that this issue of contagion was turned into a problematic issue by Arafat al-Kadhdhab and Sheikh Bukhari, together with their known and unknown tools from India, Macedonia, and even America, with the sole aim of ‘Divide and Rule.’

[riad saad @riadsaad1995]

@hikmahpubs https://t.co/y03XTrdTir

https://t.co/wsDVcdov1b

https://t.co/x8OVkjJW5p

[Abu Mu’ādh Taqweem @AbuMuadhTaqweem]

هل عادت حليمة لعادتها القديمة….

‘Has Halīmah returned to her old ways?’

We used to say to them: Stick with al-Rabi‘ and al-Jābiri, but they would reply: You’ve restricted the da’wah to just two people, and excluded al-Fawzān, al-‘Abbād, so-and-so, and so-and-so.

So we would say to them: Our scholars—by the grace of Allāh—are many, but those who are specialized and dedicated to the issues of da‘wah—as none but the stubborn would deny—are al-Rabi‘ and al-Jabiri.

Both of them, during their lives, were keen to praise the scholar al-Bukhārī and refer people to him.

But when personal desires disguise themselves as zeal for the religion, everything becomes flipped upside down.

So what is the matter with you? How do you judge?

✍️ Shaikh Abū Muhammad Salā Kantūsh (may Allāh preserve and protect him)

─━─━━∞◆∞━━─━─

[ᴀʙᴜ ᴍᴀʀyᴀᴍ @AbuMaryamT]

https://t.co/FeGh72CVgi

[SyedMajidHashmi @SyedMajidHashm6]

If the refutation of such a senior scholar as Shaykh Wasiullah Abbas was rejected against SPUBS due to the absence of principled evidence, then what position does Arafat al-Kadhdhāb hold with his lies and without principled evidence against a Sunni such as Abu Iyaad? Do these clowns think they can speak against Salafis without being asked for principled evidence? Are they daydreaming?