"I’m a data scientist, so I love that. It’s great to have that kind of information so that people like me can do some cool stuff that you wouldn’t be able to do otherwise." Thus quoth Michael Parkin in our latest case study on how Europe PMC uses ROR: https://t.co/oS2SKwbKKT
I have tried many academic writing tools over the years.
My favorite so far is @teampaperpal.
It’s an AI-based grammar assistant that has been trained with millions of academic texts - and this makes all the difference.
Here are some of its best features ⬇️
@ CSE generative AI session in Toronto #csetoronto - what do we think of applications like this: "Reference-free and cost-effective automated cell type annotation with GPT-4 in single-cell RNA-seq analysis" ?https://t.co/Onh0HsvWyz
Only a matter of time before a paper formalized this exercise:
Automated #scRNAseq cell type annotation with GPT4, evaluated across five datasets, 100s of tissues & cell types, human and mouse.
A🧵below with my thoughts on how such tools will change how #Bioinformatics is done.
..and yet here we are in 2023 and the majority of authors in scholarly manuscripts are STILL only identified by valueless text strings rather than by authenticated PIDs (#ORCID). #STMAnnualUS journals - time is running out to get real about how you add value..
40% is OA - #STMAnnualUS - must be having a significant impact on economics of subscription journals....Time to think hard about the real purpose of research journals..
For centuries research publishing has been content-centric. It’s about to become profoundly people-centric!
If you’d like to learn more, please arrange to meet Rescognito at: #CSE2023 (Toronto – April 29-May 2) or #SSP2023 (Portland OR, May 31 – June 2).
If you are a US-based researcher, please consider completing this brief survey to help Cactus understand your needs and priorities:
https://t.co/TsYFyZVyNG
Yes - but research funders are happy counting citations as a "measure" of the impact of their research investments so sadly this is not going to change
@PSAWorldTour are you doing to push back on Justice Gorsuch repeatedly trashing squash in recent #scotus oral arguments https://t.co/O3Wqt22hzd and https://t.co/DAw0ROpVhj ?
@mehmanib@Mario_Malicki Does this suggest that the true purpose of peer review is the catch the rare cases of "really wrong" papers? If so, could this be achieved more efficiently with in-house editors rather than volunteer peer reviewers? #prc9
@EikoFried@aarontay@robinnkok Most researchers benefit from public funds and in their professional capacity act as "semi public" figures. Should their professional identify be subject to the same privacy considerations as private individuals?