@CinemaShogun He was pulled in by the clique, a spot on Tucker, Buckley now glazing him as some shining example to young men. Milo the same. The desire to cast shade on Nick Fuentes is one of the motivations.
This is the female matrix in action, imagine being involved in a political discussion decades ago and saying this. It’s utterly pathetic that this is not only tolerated, but she’s elevated. This is a sickness that is literally killing a society built by people he knew better.
Ash Sarkar absolutely disgraceful behaviour on last night’s Question Time: 👇😡
“This is small penis behaviour, quite frankly. A bunch of guys who want to feel like big men because the missus says they can’t see the kids anymore.”
That’s the argument. Not numbers, hotels or crime. Not the fact most Channel arrivals are adult men who already passed through safe countries.
Just: they’re inadequate, they’re racists, and they’re probably deadbeat dads.
She said immigration opinions are “all legitimate,” then immediately proved she doesn’t believe it.
Disagree and you’re not a voter with a grievance. You’re a sad little man whose wife won’t let him see his children.
A lot of people outside those hotels aren’t “paramilitaries.” They’re locals watching services strain while politicians treat the worry as a character flaw.
The “can’t see the kids” gag is especially cheap.
Family-court trauma is a real issue. Using it as a punchline is evil and unnecessary.
When the numbers get awkward, go personal. That’s the tell.
I’m calling you to apologise and retract, but you won’t.
Fuentes is once again the only honest rightist.
He points out that by the standards conservatives set, there is no basis on which to oppose Indians at a UT football game.
"What is the problem with this? One might say. And a lot of people are going to say, well, you know, the problem is that they're not assimilated. I don't know. They look pretty assimilated to me. How much more assimilated can it get? Look, they're doing the they're doing the Texas Horn. They got the orange shirt on. One of them's even wearing a cowboy hat. They look pretty assimilated to me. I'm sure they speak English. I don't think they're woke. I'm sure they're probably broing down. I'm sure they're going to the frat party afterward and broing down. I mean, what could you even say is the problem?”
He goes on to explain what’s really going on:
“It's racial. The problem is they're Indians. That, yes, that is the problem…. everybody recognizes you go to a UT college football game in Texas, this is a place that should be white people. That's what a Texan is. That is what is appropriate in the occasion. But it's all Indians there. They're not Texans. That's not America. Everybody recognizes the problem is racial.”
On conservative hypocrisy: “And the problem is people don't even feel comfortable articulating this. In their heart of hearts, in their bones, with their eyes, they know what the problem is.”
This is much more honorable than Charlie Kirk-style lying about what is motivating you.
A movement of racists is much less distasteful to me than a movement of racist liars who pretend computer programmers moving into the country make you poorer.
Analysis of the viral entry from Lindsay Clancy’s notes app:
“I was the healthiest, happiest mom.”
— This is a grandiose, idealized version of her past self. Normal people writing privately tend to say they were doing well until they weren’t. Narcissistic writing often begins with a perfected image of self that has been unfairly stolen.
“Medication stole me from my own body.”
“Medication stole motherhood and my life.”
— She absolves herself of any agency. She didn’t make a choice, she “did what you do” indicating it’s not her fault, the medicine and appointments and therapy were done *to her* absolving herself of accountability. There’s no speculation on other reasons “why” she might feel this way. She believes medications are the problem but she’s not looking for an alternative.
“I’m sad and depressed because I am not able to parent my third child like my first.”
“I feel not as connected with Cal now. I think I sort of resent my other children because they prevent me from treating Cal like my first baby.”
— She resents the children and throughout the text, they’re only mentioned to show the scale of what was taken from *her*, she always refers back to herself. The children and the medication are at fault for every problem she names.
— I believe these notes were written for a future audience, because notes written by normal people are imperfect and fragmented. These notes are structured, edited, and read like an *explanatory* autobiography. She explains herself in ways she knows will (understandably) resonate and evoke pity. At the end of every paragraph she ends with an affirmation reminding the audience “she’s still a good mother.”