Sharrak

Lol

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@SteveSkojec I started this weight loss journey about 6 months ago. Nothing too sophisticated, i eat significantly higher ratio of protein than carbs. Intermittent fast. Don’t eat late at least 3-4 hours before bed. Oh ya, OILS. Beware of OILS (they’re so calorie dense)

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@FeserEdward This picture reminds me of a pic of my dad, except he was on a camel. I lost him this last october. Hard adjustment, as I’m sure you are fully aware of. Happy Father’s day Ed.

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@SteveSkojec Is this a sloppy or dishonest post? Stop begging the question and first present evidence that V2 has contradicted prior doctrine. Thats the SSPX claim, and I’m assuming yours too.

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@SteveSkojec You don’t sound bitter at all man.

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@SteveSkojec Pluribus

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@SteveSkojec @thestinkeye What Catholic tradition teaches suffering is a good? That’s never been taught by the church.

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@ArtemisConsort Did you read the Pope’s post?

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@FeserEdward @paracleto4 Dumb or intellectually dishonest? Probably a mix of both

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@JayDParsons @alex_prompter “Universal truth exists in mathematics and physics but not in human nature.” …..so this is not universally true, right? 😁

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@LauraLoomer Who are you

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@FeserEdward @Vermeullarmine @SohrabAhmari @PatrickDeneen @gjpappin @catholiccom “This is not about the average Catholic,” unless, of course, you defend against Sola Scriptura. What a mess of an article.

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@mfjlewis Oh, the Church teaches “that the death penalty is immoral” now? Come on man. Lies don’t make your argument stronger.

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@davidgmac9 @FeserEdward On the contrary, @FeserEdward is showing that the Church is not contradicting itself on a faith and morals issue. If it were, people would be led astray and reject its authority. I assume you don’t want that, right?

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@FeserEdward I just bought this: https://t.co/cFjLb7GS0w to express my support instead of waiting for it to be on audible.

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@FeserEdward @FeserEdward when can we expect this on Audible 😀

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@FeserEdward I’m on your third book. Good stuff

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@ferrumadducere @CraigOnan @BaritusCatholic Again, NFP works with the act as it actually is. Contraception redefines the act into something it’s not.
With NFP, you’re respecting the built in rhythm God designed times of fertility and times of infertility without altering the act itself with latex or hormonal changes, etc.

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@ferrumadducere @CraigOnan @BaritusCatholic Unitive/pleasure/bonding (one end goal of the martial act. The other, being procreative.

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@ferrumadducere @CraigOnan @BaritusCatholic NFP respects what the act is, contraception changes what the act is meant to be. one approach respects the act’s natural ordering and Gods natural design (cycles of fertility/infertilty), the other intentionally breaks it

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@ferrumadducere @CraigOnan @BaritusCatholic You can intend pleasure/bonding within the natural ordering that God designed (cycles of fertility). NFP respects what the act is but contraception changes what the act is meant to be.

[Sharrak @rickykassab]

@ferrumadducere @CraigOnan @BaritusCatholic When you use NFP, you’re doing nothing to the act. You’re just choosing not to have the act during the time your wife’s body is actually fertile. During infertile periods, the act is 100 % intact every biological power is there, nothing is blocked, nothing added, nothing broken.