The most dangerous bias among vaccine scientists is their unshakeable belief that vaccine injury is rare. That assumption blinds them to the evidence of widespread harm staring them in the face. When data shows widespread harm, they don’t follow the data — they twist it, dismiss it, or explain it away, making the data fit the faith or, if they can’t make it fit, they bury it. And when a scientist steps out of line and publishes data showing widespread harm, they go on a rampage to retract the study, get the scientist fired, and engage in a smear campaign. Examples of this abound – just watch @HighWireTalk interviews of scientists who dared publish the few such studies. You can also watch how Dr. Stanley Plotkin — the “Godfather of Vaccines” — for over nine hours deflects, appeals to his own authority, and relies on this assumption repeatedly to dismiss potential vaccine safety concerns. https://t.co/uRg1F8UgBO
“The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes… Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” Buck v. Bell, US Supreme Court (1927)
#healthfreedom
By June 2026 SCOTUS will rule whether a health professional can do conversion therapy; e.g. helping a boy accept being a boy. This may create precedent for doctors' freedom of speech like Dr. Bowden's. https://t.co/i6X9SlGhcw
I am taking this all the way.
If I don’t, it sets dangerous precedents on limiting free speech of physicians, empowering hospitals to ignore court orders, and preventing patients from seeking second opinions.
From 2020 to the present, the https://t.co/wp0sdiG0qF website has kept folks informed with an interactive state map showing both new laws and pending bills relating to our ability to choose whether or not to receive a vaccine or other medical intervention.
From 2020 to the present, the https://t.co/wp0sdiG0qF website has kept folks informed with an interactive state map showing both new laws and pending bills relating to our ability to choose whether or not to receive a vaccine or other medical intervention.
URGENT! TAKE ACTION! Oppose Washington Senate Bill 5982, a bill proposing a radical change to the definition of “Vaccine” ➡️ https://t.co/6T9loZXeat… 📷
As requested by many, at the end of the following article is one complete list of every vaccine on CDC's childhood schedule with link to FDA source showing lack of placebo control and other clinical trial deficiencies: https://t.co/yUshNvdGca
Supreme Court Makes It Easier for Employees to Receive Accommodation for Religious Beliefs - National Health Freedom Action! NHFA attorneys break it down for you. https://t.co/c6iIWr5xb5
When do government communications with media firms, aimed at getting them to limit speech, cross the line and implicate the First Amendment? In this case of Missouri v. Biden, the judge believed that this line has been crossed. https://t.co/GmWy9gS1Vn
Dr. Sarah Schulman testifies before the Massachusetts Joint Committee on Emergency Preparedness and Management to SUPPORT H.734 An Act Prohibiting Covid19 Vaccine as a Condition of Entry.
@ChildrensHD@CHD_NewEngland @MA_Senate @MassDPH@NCM4Ever@React19org@MassNurses @nocollegemandates Thank you to @Rep_PeterDurant for sponsoring this bill that will protect bodily autonomy and freedom of choice and thank you the Committee Chair @BillDriscollJrfor hearing all testimony. @statehousenews
MASSACHUSETTS: If you or a family member has experienced adverse events following the covid19 shot please share your story. If you experienced coercive tactics that negatively affected your life and family please share your story.
Health Rights MA is collecting stories of injury, loss, and coercion due to the c19 shots from Massachusetts residents to share with legislators. Please share your story; our legislators need to hear from you.
SUBMIT YOUR STORY HERE: 👉 https://t.co/Do79bwoAqp 👈