The £10,000 is “given to you” as an equity stake. Scottish Minsters will own part of your home repayable on sale. The scheme will also push up house prices so you may gain little practical benefit.
You cannot verify someone is over 18 without collecting data, and you cannot block specific types of imagery without monitoring private communications.
These claims make no sense.
Someone just sent me $25 to say thanks for cheering them up with the Hugh Laurie spat.
Which is bloomin' lovely of them. 💐 🙏
Though I rather suspect Hugh Laurie may emerge from this saga slightly ahead financially. 😂
Please then explain why your own party’s own rep on the bureau @TimEagleMSP agreed to this? Neither he nor any of the other party’s business managers appears to have blocked this when they had the power to do so.
The Somerset Farmhouse of 1 North Street, Williton were approached by a "food influencer" that wanted to charge them £2,000 for a review.
They put out a video of Sally eating a sausage roll instead 😆.
Lets make Sally and the Somerset Farmhouse famous for free.
No, Keir Starmer will announce mandatory ID checks for all social media in the next two weeks.
Let’s not be naive about what this is really about. They want to be able to track down anons and send the cops round.
Late to the party, but I've started watching Season 1 of House. Same narrative every episode:
Patient has mysterious illness.
Hugh Laurie (House) gets diagnosis wrong.
Patient nearly dies.
Hugh Laurie gets diagnosis wrong again.
Gets threatened with being fired.
Patient nearly dies again.
Hugh Laurie has last minute leftfield idea.
Gets diagnosis right.
Doesn't get fired.
Eight seasons of this?
If the women’s pond is to be mixed sex then the men’s pond will have to be too. How depressing to lose such a lovely and unique tradition, enjoyed by Londoners for years, at the behest of a handful of unpleasant and coercive men.
‘Trans people keep access to Hampstead ponds’
‘Trans people can continue to use Hamstead (sic) Heath's ponds after the City of London Corporation voted to keep the existing policy in place’
The BBC online team is incorrigible. Trans people never lost access, and were never threatened with being unable to use the ponds. That would be illegal. Whereas implementing the Supreme Court ruling is obviously not illegal.
Ludicrously misleading headline @BBCNews - designed to build an exclusion and victimhood narrative out of single-sex policy.
How hard is it to get it right?
‘Hampstead ponds to defy Equality Act on trans access’
‘‘Hampstead ponds to defy Supreme Court on trans access’
‘Hampstead ponds votes against single sex access’
‘Trans males keep access to women’s pond at Hampstead’
‘Trans people keep access to opposite sex Hampstead ponds’
No idea why the BBC wants to hide this from the transgender page, but it does. Some late in the day awareness that it’s a very bad look, perhaps.
https://t.co/deZ3DHv1Bp