🚨 STUDENT FEARS FOR HIS LIFE: "I'M NOT SUICIDAL" WHILE EXPOSING BILL GATES' TICK EXPERIMENT NIGHTMARE
A visibly shaken student has gone public with explosive research on Bill Gates, opening with a stark declaration: “I’m not suicidal. I’ll never kill myself.”
He lays out what he found on Bill Gates funding tick research tied to Plum Island and positioning himself with tick vaccines before any big outbreak even hits.
He says it’s the same old playbook Gates used with Microsoft... create the viruses, sell the Windows and antivirus, then rinse and repeat.
The really disturbing part? Alpha-Gal syndrome is blowing up. People are suddenly allergic to red meat after Lone Star tick bites, but bugs are somehow still okay.
Farmers are finding boxes of ticks dumped in fields, tick numbers are exploding worse than ever, and these things are unusually aggressive, going after humans instead of just waiting on grass.
Meanwhile Gates is all in on pushing bugs as food, 3D printed meat, and getting people to ditch real meat.
His teams are also releasing genetically modified mosquitoes everywhere under the “we’re helping” banner.
It’s starting to look less like random coincidences and more like a deliberate move to make traditional food unsustainable so we end up depending on whatever alternatives they control.
Is Bill Gates actually trying to save the world, or is this a long game to control what we eat?
Drodzy Przyjaciele, walczę z rakiem nerki z przerzutami. Całe życie budowałem mosty między ludźmi – dziś jestem zmuszony prosić Was o pomoc. Każda wpłata, udostępnienie i modlitwa ma znaczenie. Bez Was sobie nie poradzę! Bóg zapłać!🙏
⚠️ Injectable brain implants. Smart dust. Graphene tracking systems. @zeeemedia warns the public is being conditioned to accept a future where nanotechnology inside the human body can allegedly be monitored and manipulated remotely.
Brutalna Interwencja Policji w Białymstoku 🚨
Powalili 42-latka na ziemię, zakuli w kajdanki, przytrzymywali kolanem, kopali po łydce i stopach, na głowę założyli kask i wepchnęli szmatę do ust.
Powód? Bo nie miał dowodu osobistego.
- 21 kwietnia 2019 Marek Karpiuk siedział z kolegą na rampie za sklepem, rozmawiali i oglądali filmiki w telefonie.
Podjechał radiowóz, wysiedli policjanci i poprosili o dowód osobisty. Karpiuk podał imię i nazwisko, ale nie miał przy sobie dokumentu. Zamiast sprawdzić tożsamość w inny sposób, policjanci powalili go na ziemię.
Zakuli w kajdanki.
Jeden przytrzymywał kolanem okolicę szyi i szczęki (na nagraniu słychać charczenie).
Kopali po nogach.
Założyli mu specjalny kask ochronny używany przy osobach agresywnych.
Odwieźli na izbę wytrzeźwień, mimo braku podstaw bo nie był agresywny lub nie był pijany w stopniu uniemożliwiającym kontakt.
Po interwencji miał guza na głowie i pęknięty ząb. Całe zdarzenie nagrały kamery monitoringu sklepu.
-
Prokuratura Rejonowa w Białymstoku postawiła dwóm policjantom zarzuty przekroczenia uprawnień (nieuzasadnione użycie środków przymusu bezpośredniego).
Jeden z nich (dowódca patrolu) odszedł na emeryturę w trakcie sprawy.
Drugi został zawieszony, później wrócił do służby (w wydziale patrolowo-interwencyjnym).
W 2020 r. sąd warunkowo umorzył sprawę karną na rok próby, nakazał zapłatę po 10 tys. zł odszkodowania dla pokrzywdzonego. Policjanci przeprosili, a Karpiuk przyjął przeprosiny i chciał sprawę zakończyć.
Energy expert Dr. Lars Schernikau: It sounds simple… until you do the math.
• 1 GWh battery = 700,000 tons of mined materials
• Takes 450 GWh to build (450x its capacity)
• Stores as much as 400 tons of coal
Hours of storage. Massive mining, degradation & risks.
This doesn’t fix intermittency, it multiplies the destruction.
‘Batteries are an environmental nightmare’.
Jordan Peterson: "We'll probably never hit 9 billion people. This might be the most humans that are ever going to exist at one time... ever."
"I've thought for at least 10 years that the biggest problem in 50 years will be that there's just not enough people."
Chris Williamson asks about the population peak prediction:
"I remember hearing you say a few years ago that you thought we'd peak at about nine billion."
Peterson responds:
"We probably won't hit nine. Think about how crazy it is to think that we might be living on Earth right now at a time with the most number of humans that are ever going to exist at one time... ever. That's highly probable."
On why population collapse is so steep:
"In developed countries, it's precipitous. We fall off a cliff. Everyone knows this from the pandemic... the R-naught number. If fewer people are reproducing, next generation you have fewer people to reproduce. And then fewer people are reproducing from that."
On the overpopulation myth:
Peterson worked on a UN committee to help draft the Secretary General's report on sustainable economic development:
"People have been beating the overpopulation drum since the 1960s. The Club of Rome came out with dire predictions. By the year 2000, there'd be riots, mass starvation, mass movement of migrants... all the things you hear about climate change now. Because there's too many people on the planet."
What actually happened:
"That just didn't happen at all. It wasn't just wrong... it was anti-true. It was absolutely wrong. What happened instead was that everyone got way richer. The bottom section of the population got lifted out of poverty."
On what drives population decline:
"As soon as you educate women, the size of family shrinks precipitously. Below replacement. Partly because women have other options."
He lists the countries:
"All the countries in the West are way below replacement. Korea is way below replacement. South Korea. Japan. Way below replacement. I think the number one country in terms of growth might be Chad... eight children on average. Nigeria will have more people in it than China by the end of the century."
On Elon Musk's (@elonmusk) concern:
"Musk is a far-looking man. He's looking around the apocalyptic corner. We're running out of people. And what that means is... you run out of young people. You don't run out of old people first. Because everyone who is here now is going to be 30 years older in 30 years. It'll be young people we don't have enough of."
The problem:
"Young people are the ones who do the innovation. Who are going to do most of the heavy lifting. There's going to be a terrible shortage of young people."
On the "too many people" narrative:
"I posted data showing 50.1 percent of women are childless by 30. Both men and women are replying saying... 'Good. There's too many people on the planet anyway.' This NPC midwittery is so dangerous. It makes people believe they actually have something grounded backing up their claims."
Peterson is blunt:
"This idea that the planet has too many people on it... there's no sentiment more implicitly genocidal than that statement. What do you mean, too many people? Exactly. What do you mean, the planet? And what do you propose to do about that exactly? Mass abortion? Or should we do something a little more dramatic? Maybe we'll just shame people out of having children."
On an encounter at a TED talk:
"I saw a professor... an environmentalist activist type... get up on stage and shake his finger at the whole young crowd. He said him and his wife had only decided to have one child... which was, in my opinion, one child too many for him."
What the professor told the students:
"If they had a shred of ethical decency, they would severely limit their reproductive potential."
Peterson's response:
"I stood up and said that was one of the most appalling things I'd ever heard anyone in academia say to young people. Which is really saying something... because they say plenty of appalling things. It was a very uncomfortable moment. He huffed off the stage."
On the deeper psychology:
"You come out as an emissary of the academic establishment. You tell young people that humanity is so corrupt they should seriously consider not propagating. That violates the deepest of ethical norms. And you think that's a good thing?"
Peterson explains the root:
"It's associated with a deeply rooted existential self-hatred. Hatred at the level of humanity. 'We're a virus on the planet. We're a cancerous group.' Alex Epstein calls this human racism."
He continues:
"What are the implications for a doctrine like that? What do you do with a cancer? Cut it out. Poison it. There's nothing you don't do to a cancer. So you're gonna use a metaphor like that... 'there's too many people on the planet'... and then decide you're virtuous while using it? Because you're on the side of the planet... whatever the hell that means."
On the Mephistophelian stance:
Peterson references Goethe's Faust... the story of a man who sold his soul to the devil for knowledge:
"Goethe's Mephistopheles says straight out... existence is such a foul thing because of all its suffering that it would be better if it was merely annihilated. That's the Mephistophelian stance."
He describes the worldview:
"This whole show should just come to a halt. Look how corrupt people are. Evil reigns everywhere. Nothing but will to power. We're destroying the planet with our unchecked ambition. All of it rooted in greed and Machiavellianism and jockeying for position.
We're so contemptible that we should just roll up and die. We should shame women into not having children. We should shame men so they never manifest any planet-destroying ambition."
Peterson concludes:
"It's unbelievably appalling. It goes all the way down to the bottom of things. That's what's tearing our culture apart... this dispute about the nature of existence at the most fundamental level. And the universities have come out on the wrong side."
Hantawirus był na liście działań niepożądanych szczepionki Pfizera? Taki dokument istnieje - i właśnie dlatego postanowiłem sprawdzić, co naprawdę znajduje się na słynnej stronie 33 „tajnego” dokumentu.
W odcinku wracam też do historii Pawła Bednarza z Sosnowca, prezesa Fundacji im. Dobrego Pasterza. Bez legend, dopisków i internetowych mitów - za to z próbą uczciwego odtworzenia historii społecznika przez duże S.
Na koniec program SAFE: 185 miliardów długu jako ���kukułcze jajo” dla następnych pokoleń, ale prawdziwy problem może leżeć w prawie. Czy rząd ominął Konstytucję przy ratyfikacji kluczowych umów? Sprawdzam, jak pod płaszczem „logistyki” można demontować kontrolę nad polską armią.
Całość w pierwszym komentarzu 👇