Jorda Robert

[Jorda Robert @robert_jorda]

@BrysonGray I will but you’re too gullible there ain’t such video it won’t come out

[Nick shirley @nickshirleyy]

🚨 Here is the full 53 minutes of my crew and I exposing New York fraud, we uncovered over $190,000,000 in fraud as these fraudsters use the elderly and needy to commit fraud through adult and personal home care scams in NYC. Your tax dollars are paying for elderly Koreans and Chinese to play ping pong and do tai chi, while the fraudsters give $ kickbacks to those who enroll. Like it and share this video, the fraud must STOP.

We ALL work way too hard and pay too much in taxes for fraudsters to steal from our pockets. These fraudsters have been able to defraud American taxpayers for years without any pushback from the public and politicians. Time is up.

EXPOSE IT ALL AND END THE FRAUD.

[Jorda Robert @robert_jorda]

@BrysonGray But the fragments could not be identified as coming from the gun they recovered so...

[Jorda Robert @robert_jorda]

@AFpost THE FACE OF A LIAR!!

[Jorda Robert @robert_jorda]

Makes it easier to see all the zionists bots at least..

[Jorda Robert @robert_jorda]

@nick_matau What the f was that? so whats his theory besides shes trying to date a rich guy? who cares, actually good for her, their married and have how many kids? that makes him look so desperate and guilty

[Jorda Robert @robert_jorda]

@TRHLofficial Theres none, theyre all propagandist liar!!

[Jorda Robert @robert_jorda]

@GrahamAllen LIAR!!!

[Jorda Robert @robert_jorda]

@JackPosobiec LIAR!!

[Billie Webb @billiewebbb]

This is so manipulative, and you know it.
I was there today along with @brandisiciliani and we made SURE to get the phone numbers of the other members of the public incase something like this happened.

They showed a compilation of ~ 15 UVU security clips, MOST of which have already been shown to the public. Only 3 of the clips shown in court today were new to my eyes, and none of them were “high quality footage where you can see Tyler Robinson’s face crystal clear.”

I also think it’s worth mentioning that I know where you were sitting.. and you were absolutely NOT able to see how Tyler Robinson was reacting as the court played this footage?

[Brandi Siciliani @brandisiciliani]

I was in the courtroom today. There is no high-quality, zoomed-in footage showing anyone taking a shot. The video shown is the same distance as the footage of “Tyler” jumping off the roof shown in this screen shot. 

I have no idea why people are claiming otherwise. They know the video isn’t going to be released publicly, so they’re misrepresenting what was actually shown in court.

[Jorda Robert @robert_jorda]

Don't fuck with @RealCandaceO

[GodFatherOfChaos @godfatherofchao]

What we have found out so far that absolutely supports a conspiracy in the Tyler Robinson case:

1. Officer’s camera “dies” right when he gets to the top of the Losee Center

2. The screwdriver, towel, and rifle all contained substantial DNA contributions from Lance Twiggs

3. Twiggs was given at least partial immunity

4. A bald guy and 3 others were seen driving Tyler’s car

5. Discord messages were posted after Tyler was in custody and had his phone confiscated

6. There is no video of Tyler taking the shot

7. Despite multiple angles of new and existing video evidence of Tyler being on campus, zero clear, identifiable footage has been presented.

8. Oh! And there was an unfired round found on another rooftop that didn’t get admitted into evidence.

Everyone out here screaming “the conspiracy has been debunked!”, ima need y’all to kindly pull your heads out of your asses and provide us with some answers. At the very least stop acting like this isn’t strange.

[Vivian Kubrick @ViKu1111]

Andrew

Let me offer advice.

Experienced investigators pay close attention not only to what a person says, but to what they avoid, what provokes disproportionate anger, and where they repeatedly try to redirect attention.

When someone confronted with factual questions responds by attacking the questioner’s character, motives, sanity and reputation, that behavior does not make the questions disappear. It makes investigators more interested in why those questions produce such an extreme reaction.

Your response is not the language of a man calmly confident that the evidence supports him. It is the language of someone desperate to control the frame: Charlie’s death must be discussed only on your terms, Tyler Robinson must be accepted as the killer, alternative explanations must be ridiculed rather than examined, and anyone who refuses to comply must be publicly destroyed.

That is not a rebuttal. It is containment.

Candace has been conducting what every genuine investigation requires: collecting testimony, crowdsourcing information, following leads, testing theories and discarding those that fail. Some leads will inevitably reach dead ends. That is not proof of dishonesty; it is the nature of investigation. What matters is whether substantial questions remain unanswered—and they do.

Yet instead of answering those questions with evidence, you substitute moral outrage, mockery and character assassination. You invoke Charlie, Erika and the children as emotional shields, as though grief grants you exclusive authority over the facts or makes scrutiny immoral. It does not.

You claim Candace lacks proof while demanding that everyone accept Tyler Robinson’s guilt despite evidence that remains weak, contested and inconclusive. You therefore apply one standard to Candace and another to the official narrative: absolute proof is required before she may ask questions, but certainty is demanded from the public before the case itself has established it.

That contradiction is becoming impossible to miss.

So here is the advice an experienced interrogator might give you: stop attacking the person asking the questions and start answering the questions themselves. Stop repeating certainty where certainty has not been earned. Stop behaving as though investigation is a threat.

Because every time you respond to evidence with sarcasm or moral outrage, to questions with insults, and to uncertainty with enforced certainty, you do not make Candace look less credible.

You make yourself look more concerned about where the investigation may lead.

@RealCandaceO @baroncoleman @JohnMappin @ImMappin @joekent16jan19 @TRobinsonNewEra @LionelMedia @IanCarrollShow @AwakenWithJP @jimmy_dore @OwenBenjamin @leahfiles @realstewpeters @EstulinVz @RealAlexJones @HarrisonHSmith
@BlakeSNeff @TPUSA @DonaldJTrumpJr
#TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #TPUSA #Israel

[Jorda Robert @robert_jorda]

Actually everything is pointing to a conspiracy to paint Tyler as the killer, it's even more evident now that they have no evidence of him killing Charlie. Instead of waiting humbly for the evidence, they automatically said Tyler is guilty, it makes THEM look bad.

[Jorda Robert @robert_jorda]

There's zero evidence for Tyler Robinson being the killer, ZERO. Not saying he did not do it, so far the evidence does not show he did. So what evidence do people have to say he did it?

[Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸 @EvanAKilgore]

BREAKING:

Samantha Carner, from the ATF forensic lab in Washington, confirms "there is a lack of sufficient agreement and sufficient disagreement" to conclusively tie the major bullet fragment found in Charlie Kirk to the rifle retrieved in the woods near UVU campus.

She notes at times she found both "sufficient agreement and sufficient disagreement," but ultimately concluded the threshold did NOT meet the standard to confirm a match.

[🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸 @LionelMedia]

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what we call not guilty.

[Owen Benjamin 🐻 @OwenBenjamin]

No one witnessed Tyler Robinson. No video or any witness testimony of him, a gun, or any forensic evidence at all. Except dna on a rifle he owned that wasn’t tested for residue and did not alert any of the dogs.

The footage never shows a gun or a clear shot of his face. It appears to be multiple people or he changes outfits.
There is no evidence matching any bullet to the gun they claim was used.

The only “evidence” they have are text messages that don’t sound real that have not been made available to the defense to analyze. Text messages can be sent by anyone. That isn’t evidence.

And a confession that doesn’t exist and a claim his mother recognized him from the footage that we now can all see. That statement has not been made available and probably doesn’t exist, and it doesn’t matter. The video doesn’t show any crime and it’s not clear enough for any positive ID.

There are mountains of circumstantial evidence that turning point USA conspired to either kill Charlie Kirk or cover up his murder.

There is an end times cult that is convinced that in order to bring back Jesus they need the US to lose to Iran and the world to turn on Israel and burn. That’s a fact btw. That’s what Ben Shapiro and Trump and kushner and the “pastors” surrounding Charlie believe. They are claiming anyone that is NOT in their world destroying death cult is in fact in Candace Owens cult. People who don’t think Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk and Erika is a crazy bitch.

Everything I just said is obviously accurate. It never ends well for death cults. This is not the first and it’s not the last. I recommend staying far far away as they destroy themselves