In case you're intrested in where The BMJ stands on Presidential Executive Orders banning certain language from reseatch communications https://t.co/p3iqBlRgD1 @KamranAbbasi@jocalynclark
Following the news that eLife will not receive an Impact Factor in 2025, we’ve shared an update on how our model is doing since we were first placed “on hold” by Web of Science, and what we’re up to now. Find out more.
https://t.co/mhpvPEa5kV
@DanielElleder@mbeisen Thanks. Do you think this is a problem specific to the Czech Republic (or even the Czech Academy of Sciences) or is more generic?
Economic barriers shouldn't limit scholarly voices! The Equitable Pricing Framework, developed by @InformationPowr for @cOAlitionS_OA, aims to help maximise participation in #ScholComm.
Read more by @wisealic & join our Jan 16 webinar✍️ https://t.co/QXEf54u4eN #OAWeek#OpenAccess
As we celebrate the #OAWeek, let's hear from @PLOS on the "How Equitable Is It?" framework and how it will support their efforts to increase equitable participation in Open Science.
More by Roheena Anand here: ✍️https://t.co/am1PJonfcc
#OpenAccess#Equity#HowEquitableIsIt
This is a great explainer for the Publish-Review-Curate model. There can be different 'flavours' of PRC, which is already happening, but there are some fundamental principles to each of the P-R-C stages which are important to understand: https://t.co/T5xz0WLZEc
“The Equity Tool helps users consider a range of criteria to move away from inequitable article-based models and facilitate more equitable participation in knowledge sharing”, commented @robertkiley, @cOAlitionS_OA during the #OASPA2024 Panel on “Building #Equity in #OpenAccess”
The "How Equitable Is It?" tool results from robust discussions within the "Beyond article-based charges" Working Group. The group's strength lies in diverse stakeholder views: funders, librarians & publishers, as Roheena Anand @PLOS notes.
Huge 👏to all!
https://t.co/S96qfDgRt7
@cOAlitionS_OA@Jisc@PLOS Many thanks to my colleagues in the "Beyond Article-based Charges Working Group (https://t.co/zXKvweRvqm) for their help and support in developing this framework.
Hear more about the How Equitable Is It? online tool at the #oaspa2024 conference later this morning
🙋 What if we’d turn the peer reviewed publishing venue Open Research Europe into a collective, non-profit #OpenAccess service for the public good?
Explore our latest publication to find out more: https://t.co/oRDr6e4Ilw
@lisalibrarian Seems like a clear misuse of the Subscribe to Open label if non-subscribers have to pay an APC.
As you say, this looks like a Read and Publish agreement.
If it looks like a duck….
cOAlition S releases pricing framework, developed by @InformationPowr, to foster global #equity in scholarly publishing. Key features:
🟠Open, transparent, World Bank data
🟠Country banding model
🟠Excel-based tool
🟠Local currency analysis
➡https://t.co/WF0I5oIh1a
#ScholComm
@cOAlitionS_OA@rschconsulting@cwtsleiden And there is an interactive dashboard where you can see the results of the researcher survey and filter these data in different ways, including by region, research experience and discipline.
See: https://t.co/TVZrfWP9it
At GuilFest in the sun. Looking forward to seeing Nouvelle Vague and the Strangers later. Not sure who is currently on stage. Maybe Eddie and the Hot Rods?