@Aaronontheweb@InezFeltscher Interesting. "trunk or treat" was at the school with all the kids' school friends and "trick or treat" was in the neighborhood with all the neighbors.
Kids got to wear and share their costumes on multiple nights. It was fun (my kids are older now).
People who think SaaS or legacy commercial products will vanish because someone will reverse-engineer them and publish the code on GitHub don't know how OSS really works.
While OSS code is free for anyone to change and improve, that's the exception, not the rule. Most clients just want a working product, and if it doesn't work, they'd rather move on than spend their energy on fixing it.
After all, how many people use Linux on their desktops, compared to Macs and Windows?
@RustyRishii GitHub charges the payer fees, not the payee. Also, invoices have a $5000 minimum. At least in the countries I know of.
This is not generally good advice.
@kuza55 I understand. I've been thinking about different facets of the OSS sustainability problem for a while. The OSMF is a fairly recent attempt to tackle maintainer burnout: https://t.co/rlFlHMbkIq.
What I'm trying to figure out now is what sort of world do we want?
@darren_l_clark@Dave_DotNet The NuGet file format includes a mechanism called "requireLicenseAcceptance" that lets the author indicate that their .nupkg requires license acceptance.
Unfortunately, only VS respects it. So, a solution is only partially implemented...
@ThatsPranav Nothing wrong with NOT choosing an OSI license. Just don't say you did. And definitely don't highlight "Open Source" as your key differentiator when you're not. That makes you look untrustworthy.
Needed to return an order to @Chewy b/c one of my cats passed away and it was an autoship of food that was just for him, and they offered a refund without returning the food. They suggested donating it to a shelter or friend. Can’t tell you how much that meant to me 💗
@aarnott GPL is not the definition of copyleft. Famous, but not singular.
My issue is that some people are trying to redefine Open Source without its core freedoms. By all means, debate the merits of individual licenses (RPL!?!?), but OSS means something. I hope we don't forget that.
This is false. Copyleft isn't about scarcity or the One Ring. Copyleft is about freedom.
And we should question anyone who wants to take those freedoms away.
The entire copyleft licensing regime was built for a "software is scarce and precious" world that no longer exists. But watch the old guard cling to these obsolete rites like a pre-reformation priest to a Latin Bible.
@aarnott IMHO, the GPL has too much "manifesto" in it. I think the MS-RL is a better copyleft example.
Old thoughts I still believe:
https://t.co/DBJCuSuBRy