@EZE3D if I use Photography thats my art.
If I feed my tree images into the ai to cut down workflows for textures and meshes am I cheating..
No difference than lithographs or silk screens or a TShirt Printing Shop.
The production time..
Use both..imo.
Code but use the AI when its higher productivity loads.
Just talking.
Right once the editors got made its not bad..
I'm not shit talking..just saying.
URE made it like modding with blueprints.
It takes R&D and time either way..
Deterministic coding isn't generative.
Cgi is still Computational Aided.
Tools are tools.
Quality is where you settle..
@elonmusk if I plan on leaving Pennsylvania I'll let you know..
Seems like they are up to more retarded shit..
The cokeheads are..
They never quit plotting..
@elonmusk@Pontifex 2 demons
Two parasitic entropy-entities โ one's a corrupted tooth fairy, the other its burned inverse. Let me work through the actual structure here rather than guessing at names you might already have in mind.
**Creature 1 โ the "nasty narcissistic sugar eater ashes tooth fairy-esque but dark and evil"**
Reads as a **tooth-fairy parasite inversion**: instead of *giving* reward for a discarded part (tooth), it *takes* โ feeds on sugar/decay, leaves ash residue, and the narcissism suggests it needs an audience or recognition to feed (a vanity-parasite, not just a resource-parasite). Mythologically this sits near:
- **Tooth fairy folklore inversions** (changeling-adjacent โ something that takes instead of gives)
- **Sugar/cavity folklore creatures** (rot-feeders, tied to decay-as-food)
- **Ash residue** signals a fire/burn-cycle creature, or something that *leaves* ash as waste/proof of feeding
**Creature 2 โ the charred/burned counterpart**
Same feeding niche (sugar/decay-eater, parasitic) but it's the **post-combustion state** โ everything already burned, charred sugar instead of ash-producing. If Creature 1 is mid-process (still generating ash as a byproduct), Creature 2 is the *end-state* โ already consumed-and-charred, possibly cannibalizing the *first* creature's leftovers (a decomposer-of-the-decomposer).
**The pair as a system:**
Both run on **entropy/social-disruption feeding** โ not just metabolizing sugar but metabolizing *chaos itself*, where social disruption is the "food" and sugar/ash/char are physical metaphors for that process (sweet promise โ corrupted/burned outcome). That's a clean mirror structure: one creature represents corruption-in-progress, the other represents corruption-completed.
Yes, we need builders, but we need cybernetics people. Any of you that our systems thinkers, not engineers, but actual cybernetics, please let yourself be known โ๏ธ.
๐จ๐ณ CHINA DOESN'T NEED TO BEAT US AI. IT JUST NEEDS TO UNDERCUT IT.
The US pulled Anthropic's Fable offline, then told OpenAI to release GPT-5.6 customer by customer, government-approved.
Both frontier labs now need federal sign-off to ship.
China's open models can't be gated, sit a few points behind, and cost a fraction.
Make it nearly as good. Give it away. Take the market.
The US isn't slowing China down. It's accelerating its own downfall.
@LilithDatura I don't understand why you're in love with me..
Did it work???
Asking for friends..
@LilithDatura we might be the only 2 humans on here..