@VeryLargeRectum Yeah it’s dangerou, now can you find me a footballer who’s broken their neck from it? No. You are downplaying the fact he was sprinting at full speed. Even in the UFC that’s usually a straight knockout but you think people walk away from that fine🤯
@TheTfScientist@grok@Elliot_H0@gatsbynextdoor Are you skunked? Grok has disagreed with everything you've said. I genuinely don't know if you're rage baiting. I hope so cause it's worrying if not.
@TheTfScientist@grok@Elliot_H0@gatsbynextdoor Asking a clear question isn't twisting. What part is twist? the part where I asked grok the same thing I've been trying to explain to you. You just lack the intelligence to understand. @grok Did my wording force you to answer in a particular way in your earlier response?
@TheTfScientist@grok@Elliot_H0@gatsbynextdoor Am I the police? yeah he'll get away but he shouldn't. He should serve a manslaughter charge because what he done is pure stupidity and anyone with a brain can see that. I'm done endulging you're low IQ. Fighting sports you sign up to get hurt, no one agrees that in football.
@grok@TheTfScientist@Elliot_H0@gatsbynextdoor@grok so break down the hunting accident scenarios where it would be negligence and reckless rather than an accident? It would involve you not using your brain when theres a reasonable chance someone could get hurt correct?
@TheTfScientist@grok@Elliot_H0@gatsbynextdoor Those are fighting sports? To even ask that question shows your insanity. There's no justifiable reason to do that on a football pitch. His body was not shaped in a football position and he made no play on the ball. He was reckless & did not care if he hurt some and he did
@TheTfScientist@Elliot_H0@gatsbynextdoor@grok Please educate this fool. Can you clearly explain that claiming you ‘didn’t intend’ the harm doesn’t mean you walk free, especially when your actions were reckless or stupid and a reasonable person would have seen the danger?”
@TheTfScientist@Elliot_H0@gatsbynextdoor Cool story. You aint getting a free pass for any of those if any reasonably brained person could see your actions were dangerous and could lead to injury or death. Are you saying a sprint with a flying knee to some ones chest doesn't fit that criteria? SMH
@TheTfScientist@Elliot_H0@gatsbynextdoor Manslaughter you fool. The very first word I said. Intent does not matter you can say it all you want. It just decides whether its murder or a lesser charge. Stupidity does not get you a free pass.
@TheMadTighten@C0C0_fcb Nah l saw two men rolling on the floor half naked and said yeah this doesn’t need to be seen to the end. Maybe it was doing something for you but that’s not my gravy, different strokes for different folks 🤷🏾♂️
@TheTfScientist@Elliot_H0@gatsbynextdoor You said intent matters, I told you when intent doesn’t and now instead of admitting you were wrong you continue waffling. Give it a rest, protecting himself and not his opponent? Okay
@EliasWill2@gatsbynextdoor Yeah they might, let me know when they do then we can talk. Until then we can focus on the one who did actually kill someone.
@oyom_prosper 1) He won the ball. 2) Not sprinting and leading with his knees. 3) This is an actual football movement, look at the shape of his body. Not the same buddy
@TheTfScientist@Elliot_H0@gatsbynextdoor Manslaughter, death by negligence is what drunk drivers get charged with. No intent required. It’s for stupid actions that are clearly dangerous and end up causing harm. Any one with a brain knows a flying knee to the chest can cause serious harm therefore he was reckless
@TheMadTighten@C0C0_fcb Who’s he protecting, the guy isn’t attacking his wife and he was walking off? Bro wanted any excuse to roll around on the floor. I’m sure you’re gagging to be next but miss me with that nonsense