@For_Macragge@MikeArchrr@SawarynK Right ? It's a body type not a gender, it's fine if you don't like the redcon or how it was implemented but saying "it breaks immersion because it forces you to use women" is just ridiculous
@bloodroses04 Wargame that has gotten fairly popular recently, chuds went full exodus when 40k added women custodes claiming it was their game now. Game creator said "btw lgbt welcome in community" and chuds went "WHAT ! BETREIAL! THING IS NOT 110% CATERING TO MY VIEWS !?!"
@ArxOpus Ça rends pas mal dutout ! Peut être mettre une bille la ou le second bras se connecte au canon et le peindre en oeil pour masquer la jointure ?
@MikeArchrr@For_Macragge There ARE lean custodes, peak human physique doesn't always mean "can't reach behind their back because of superdevelopped deltoids" They are as diverse in bodytype as their are diverse in mindset. That's why they're not only guardians but confidents and advisors to big E
@MikeArchrr@For_Macragge Did you look with your eyes at the photo I put ? The "manly man" torso on the right is used for a women, neither have tits.
Calling CUSTODES femboys because they have the lean muscles of greek athletes while they look like this under the armour is just ridiculous
@MikeArchrr@For_Macragge Not only is the old kit still available so they don't force you to do anything, but there are no female torso, some bodies are slimmer but the only "female" we see in the kit is one of the bulkiest warrior so any of them could or could not be man at your leisure