From his command post in Google occupied Ottawa, an embattled leader makes his final stand against the fascists. He sees a new world on the horizon; a world free from the misinformation and disinformation he's fought so long to suppress.
He looks to his LGBTQLMNOP++HTTP flag and salutes his fallen gender fluid they/thems before charting a course through the internet. The terrain is dangerous- full of inconvenient facts and opinions, but he knows if he can pass enough censorship legislation he can end the offensive from the phobia phobic phobes once and for all. Armed with nothing but thoughts and prayers, this is the story of one hero on a mission to silence dissent and seize total control of a population.
Godspeed, young Castro.
Sharing for Educational purposes ✔️ 💯
These are called "Bay leaves"
Many people add bay leaves to foods, especially jollof rice(Nigerian), red meat, and poultry, but do you know why bay leaves are added to food?
When asked why, some reply: to add flavor to the food👐
Do you know that if you boil some bay leaves in a glass of water and taste it, it will have no flavor?
Now, why do you put bay leaves in the meat?
The addition of bay leaves to meat converts triglycerides to monounsaturated fats and for experimentation and confirmation:
Cut the chicken in half and cook each half in a pan and place on one bay leaf, and the other without bay leaf and observe the amount of fat in both pans.
If you have bay leaves, there is no need for a pharmacy. Recent scientific studies have shown that bay leaves have many benefits & and help to get rid of many serious health problems and illnesses.
The benefits of bay leaf are: -
*Bay leaf treats digestive disorders and helps eliminate lumps, heartburn, acidity & and constipation.
*It helps regulate bowel movement by drinking hot bay tea.
*It lowers blood sugar, and bay leaf is also an antioxidant
*It allows the body to produce insulin by eating it or drinking bay tea for a month.
*IT eliminates bad cholesterol and relieves the body of triglycerides.
*It's very useful in treating colds, flu and severe cough as it is a rich source of vitamin "C", you can boil the leaves and inhale steam to get rid of phlegm and reduce the severity of cough.
*Bay leaf protects the heart from seizures and strokes as it contains cardiovascular protective compounds.
*It's rich in acids such as caffeic acid, quercetin, eigonol, and bartolinide, substances that prevent the formation of cancer cells in the body.
*It eliminates insomnia and anxiety, if taken before bed, helps you relax and sleep peacefully.
Drinking a cup of boiled bay leaves twice a day breaks kidney stones and cures infections ...
Just like garlic and ginger are a must find amongst my collection of spices, Bay leaves are a must in my collection of spices too(my little spice secrets to good aroma and flavor)
Good morning my fellow Canadians! Just recently, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau issued a public statement on a horrific attack that occurred at the University of Waterloo. The incident involved a stabbing within a gender studies class, which resulted in the professor and two students suffering serious injuries. In a tweet, Trudeau strongly condemned the attack and asserted that it was "a fact" that the act was motivated by hate.
However, Trudeau's choice of words in this context is both premature and potentially misleading. The investigation into the incident is still ongoing, and while the police may have expressed their belief that the incident was motivated by hate towards gender expression and identity, it remains exactly that - a belief, not a confirmed fact. Trudeau's use of definitive language in the absence of confirmed evidence can be seen as an attempt to manipulate public sentiment and opinion.
On his Twitter account, Trudeau referred to a recent stabbing incident at the University of Waterloo as a "hate-motivated" attack, stating it as "fact". He condemned the incident in the strongest terms, calling it "absolutely despicable" and linked it to "misogynistic, anti-2SLGBTQI+ rhetoric." Yet, at the time of his comments, the incident was only "believed" to be hate-motivated, not confirmed.
Herein lies a serious concern. By presenting a belief as fact, the Prime Minister is engaging in a form of politicization that can potentially skew public perception. As leaders, it's important to rely on facts, not conjecture, and to communicate that clearly to the public.
What's more striking is the selective outrage Trudeau has exhibited. Let's consider the stark silence from Trudeau regarding the April terrorist knife attack on a Surrey bus, where Abdul Aziz Kawam was charged with terrorism and attempted murder, with the knife attack allegedly committed in the name of ISIS.
Why the silence on this confirmed act of terrorism? Is it not deserving of the same public condemnation as the incident in Waterloo?
Similarly, Trudeau has yet to publicly acknowledge the violent attack on a senior at a CTrain station in Calgary, or the knife attack in Toronto's GO train station. These acts of violence, like the incident in Waterloo, have real victims and real-life consequences, yet they seem to be overlooked in the Prime Minister's public commentary.
It's important to ask why these crimes are not receiving the same level of attention. Is it that some crimes are more politically convenient to comment on than others? Are the victims of terrorism, seemingly random violence, and gang-related crime less deserving of sympathy, support, and public recognition?
In doing so, Trudeau is missing an opportunity to unite Canadians against all forms of violence and hatred, not just those that fit a particular narrative. He is also failing to address legitimate concerns about bail policies and public safety, as raised by the Conservative Party of Canada.
The Conservatives attribute this rise in crime to legislative changes like Bill C-75, which they claim makes it easier for violent criminals to receive bail, and the recent passage of Bill C-5, which eliminated mandatory prison time for serious crimes committed with guns. The party is now calling for the immediate repeal of elements in Bill C-75 that force judges to release violent, repeat offenders onto the streets and a strengthening of Canada’s bail laws so that those prohibited from possessing firearms do not easily get bail.
Trudeau's silence isn't limited to individual acts of violence. It extends to broader issues of public policy, too, particularly where bail reform is concerned. This is a pressing issue that has been brought to the forefront by provinces across the country, especially in response to a significant rise in gun-related crimes.
Various provinces have been quite vocal about their desire for changes to the bail system, and for good reason. In 2022, there were 44 shooting-related homicides in Toronto alone, with 24 of the accused persons on a firearm-related or other type of bail when they allegedly committed the offence. The current bail system seems to be failing Canadians, allowing dangerous repeat offenders back onto the streets, often on the same day they're arrested.
The federal government did promise to address these concerns. Bill C-75, which made it easier for violent criminals to receive bail, and the subsequent Bill C-5, which removed mandatory prison time for serious crimes committed with guns, have been controversial to say the least. Every Premier in Canada and many police associations have been calling on the Liberal Government to reform this system.
However, progress on this front has been frustratingly slow. The legislature has gone on summer break, effectively stalling the progress of the bill for bail reform. This delay leaves the public in a precarious position, with dangerous criminals potentially being released back onto the streets while lawmakers enjoy their summer vacation.
This matter was a point of contention at the Western premiers' annual meeting on June 27, 2023. The premiers expressed their displeasure with the federal government's inaction, raising questions about where the government's priorities lie. The delay in passing this crucial legislation is not just a bureaucratic inconvenience - it's a matter of public safety.
This inaction by the Trudeau government raises serious questions about its commitment to addressing the real and present danger that Canadians face every day. As violent crime continues to rise, the need for comprehensive and effective bail reform becomes ever more urgent. The government's current approach, however, leaves much to be desired.
Canadians deserve a government that takes their safety seriously, that acts swiftly and decisively to protect them from violent crime, and that prioritizes the passage of crucial legislation over summer holidays. It's time for Trudeau to step up and deliver on his promises.
The glaring contrast between the Trudeau government's response to an alleged hate crime and its silence on a confirmed charge of terrorism cannot be ignored. It says a lot about the priorities of this administration.
While Trudeau was quick to condemn the alleged hate crime at the University of Waterloo, calling it "despicable" and "vile", he has remained notably silent on the Surrey bus attack, despite the fact that the suspect was charged with terrorism in the name of the Islamic State. This discrepancy in response is striking and raises questions about the government's stance on these serious issues.
Moreover, the government's attempt to portray the opposition's silence as "disturbing" seems disingenuous at best. The opposition has been quite vocal about the rising knife violence in Canada, calling for immediate changes to the failed Liberal bail policies. The Conservatives have been advocating for reforms that prioritize the rights of victims and law-abiding citizens, and aim to keep dangerous, repeat offenders off the streets.
In contrast, the Liberals have been largely inactive. Despite the pressing need for bail reform and the clear calls for action from every Premier in Canada and many police associations, the government has stalled progress on this front, choosing instead to go on summer break.
This inaction from the Liberals raises serious doubts about their commitment to addressing crime and ensuring public safety. It appears they are more interested in virtue signaling and political posturing than in taking decisive action to protect Canadians from violent crime. The public deserves a government that is willing to prioritize their safety over political gains.
After observing the events and Trudeau's response, it's clear that the Liberals, led by Justin Trudeau, have chosen to single out one knife attack among many. The question that comes to mind is, why this particular case? Why this specific incident out of the many violent incidents that have been occurring across Canada? The answer, sadly, lies in the political capital that can be extracted from it.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is the epitome of "selective outrage". It's a tactic used to inflame public sentiment, not based on the severity or the frequency of such incidents, but on the perceived political benefits that can be reaped from them. The Trudeau government, with its virtue signalling, seems to be more interested in playing the role of social justice champions than in addressing the real and pressing issues of violent crime plaguing the country.
By focusing their outrage on this single incident, Trudeau and his Liberals are not only disrespecting the victims of other crimes that didn't make their political cut, but they're also distorting the public's perception of the true nature and extent of violent crime in Canada.
And let's be clear here - any form of violent crime, any attack that leaves innocent individuals hurt or worse, is an affront to society. Every single one of them deserves our attention, our concern, and a strong, determined response.
The politicization of crime, the picking and choosing of tragedies to respond to based on political calculations, is nothing short of repugnant. It reduces the victims to mere political props and obscures the real issues at hand.
So, here's the reality, as bitter as it might be: Trudeau's Liberals are not serving justice with their selective outrage. They're not making Canada safer with their virtue signalling. They're merely playing politics with people's lives, and that is a game no one wins.
This is not leadership. This is not governance. This is, in its crudest form, pathetic virtue signalling. And the Canadian people, the victims of these crimes, and the issues at hand deserve far better than that.
#cdnpoli
Imagine being @JoeBiden. Your son makes millions of dollars from foreign entities but does not pay taxes because that would mean disclosing that he is engaged in foreign lobbying. With the millions of dollars and no serious job, he becomes a drug addict and illegally obtains a gun. All he tells them is that he is the son of the US Vice President, and he claims that part of the money will go to the "Big Guy." He promises them access to his dad and top US officials. They hire him without any qualifications and pay him millions of dollars.
Eventually, the information comes out, and the Justice Department has to investigate. The investigation drags on for five years, and eventually, they strike a deal with him to plead guilty to two misdemeanors of tax evasion so that the government would not prosecute him for illegally possessing a gun as a drug addict, a serious crime that has sent tens of thousands of Americans to prison for years.
Imagine being the same father who, as a senator, drafted a draconian anti-drug law that sent tens of thousands of black people and others to prison, confiscated all their belongings, and gave a big speech boasting that the drug addicts should all be taken off the streets. Now that your son is one of them, when you're asked about his case, you say you're proud of him and he has done nothing wrong.
Imagine journalists and commentators like @joenbc justifying it on television, singing your praises when their own child would have been in prison long ago for the same crimes. Imagine the people who believed in the rule of law watching the two-tiered justice system so brazenly displayed.
America is in crisis. May God help us all!
Joe Trying to bully Dr Hotez?
Interesting
Let me address 5 issues with your tweet:
1. Bullying
Millions of Americans from all walks of life were bullied into taking the vaccine.
Some forced
Many coerced
Many threatened to lose their jobs
Thousands of businesses went bankrupt
Families were divided on the vaccine issue.
Late night hosts doing skits dressed in a syringes
Mayors of NY city offering free fries if you took the vaccine
NIH director flip flopping on masks
MSM calling those who questioned the vaccine “conspiracy theorists”
And you call @joerogan a bully? 🤔
2. Capitalism
What makes capitalism work
Freedom to buy
Freedom to sell
Freedom to try
Freedom to fail
Key word is “FREEDOM”
You told me 10 years ago that your favorite book was Atlas Shrugged. I even gifted you a 1st print, 1st edition of the book 8 years ago.
A story of a dystopian 🇺🇸 in which private businesses suffer under increasingly burdensome laws & regulations.
Of all the people who knows what happened the last 3 years, it’s YOU.
We all know who got destroyed in that book.
The small business owner
The man/woman who risked it all for a dream
These men & women who are heroes to society were bullied, mocked, silenced and disrespected during the pandemic.
How were laws and regulations during COVID?
How many small business owners lost everything?
You have the stats.
You know the numbers.
You know you’re against this.
I sometimes wonder what you fear?
What is preventing you from using your logic, experience and common sense (that YOU have a ton of) to share that POV with YOUR followers? 🤔
3. Debate
I’ve watched you closely over the years. You’re great at debating.
So great that you could argue both sides of any issue.
I think you ought to make a run for the 2024 presidential election.
You have some very good points.
I digress.
You say let’s not disrespect all the medical professionals that dedicate their lives to saving lives, like @PeterHotez & the 800k plus doctors in the country that believe vaccines save lives.
One of the benefits of living in 🇺🇸 is its health care system.
My Dad was supposed to be dead 37 years ago after having a MASSIVE heart attack. He wasn’t supposed to live past 65.
We just celebrated his 81st b-day thanks to great doctors who took care of him.
But just like cops, we know 99% of them do the right thing but the 1% who don’t, should we not hold them accountable?
All Joe is asking for is a debate.
If Dr. Hoetz is right, then what does he have to lose?
Is he too good for it?
You sure don’t fear debating anyone?
Why protect Dr Hotez instead of letting them get in the ring?
Debating is the American way. It helps us get closer to the truth.
4. Comparing @elonmusk & Rogan to mainstream media
That’s a bit of a stretch but I have an idea of why you would say that.
Before October of last year, these types of conversations were NOT possible on twitter, FB or YT.
Only in private settings
Many content creators were silenced if they interviewed people with opposing views on COVID.
Our @RobertKennedyJr interview was taken down on YT 2 years ago.
Content creators were walking on egg shells afraid of being deplatformed.
Musk isn’t silencing anyone who argues for vaccines.
He’s actually creating a climate to have the debate.
Just this week MSNBC & CNN both said they won’t air Trump’s speech because they already knew in advance that he’ll tell lies. As if JB only tells the truth? 🤔
That sounds like a dictatorship where the elite know what’s best for you & I.
As if we can’t think for ourselves. A bit arrogant + pompous, don’t you think?
Thank God for @Twitter, @Spotify, @Rumble and other platforms who allowed for the discussion to happen.
5. Cost Plus Drugs
As a marketer, I respect your strategy of getting into this thread to promote costplusdrugs.
A lesson for small business owners.
Keep pushing the envelope. We need as many voices as possible.