@nansen_ai please I don't know where else to post, check this cluster, it's not correct, here's my tweet where I explained everything
@PrimordialAA@LayerZero_Labs@nansen_ai
https://t.co/7niEaX3UZN
@PrimordialAA my wallet: 0x9D91B7a1F1B21B21B8229014fDD91CCf5a5480ebd79
Please remove it from the sybils list or cancel the whole #CLUSTER 64
https://t.co/QBTHZp3C0F
@PrimordialAA cluster author refers to the fact that wallets in clusters also use other projects such as zksync and others and does not provide any additional evidence, many real people use zksync and other projects, it does not make them sybils.
@PrimordialAA Yes, there are similar wallets in this cluster, but they are not the same, all activities are made in the peak of layerzero activity (may/june), so there is a high probability of similarity of wallets, but it is not obvious to the naked eye that they are different!
@PrimordialAA conclusion:
In this cluster colossally different wallets in terms of activity, different transactions in different protocols, different transaction times.
@PrimordialAA 7)0xd94aa7809b4344582b2fe3525578170eea9985fd
https://t.co/XYIEp6vsAy
has transactions in l2 pass, my wallet has no such transactions, and is characterized by such transactions: holograph,testnet bridge