His date of birth is 17 Dec 2005. Please retweet this. If you know him, please tell him to remain anonymous. He just needs to contact DKMS, even if it’s to say ‘no’. That would give us closure.
Solidarität mit den Frauen in Australien und überall, wo Frauen für ihre Rechte, Räume u Entscheidungen kämpfen müssen.
#IStandWithSallGrover@AusEmbGermany
When I started talking about PERIODS openly I honestly didn't expect my voice to matter. Who am to be recognised and receive the amount of unwavering support that I receive from everyone all across the globe. THANK YOU ALL ❤️
We have been granted leave to appeal (on all grounds) to take UCU back to tribunal. 👏to all who have supported us. We await a date for tribunal & continue to raise funds for our legal team. Please support if u can and share - thank you.
https://t.co/zFK4o4pep1
This week's gratitude to:
💜 @akuareindorf for keeping it real,
💜 @ScotLesbians repeating we are far from adjacent to men
💜 @_lliesl_ calling out the rapid onset butch lesbian concern by politicians.
#LesbianFightback here's our celebration quote, pinned for a week.
🎉 Incredible milestone! From launch in March to 10,000 strong - thank you to every single one of you for standing with us.
Together we’re defending sex-based rights, safety & spaces for women & girls across Scotland. The fight goes on!
Stronger together 💚🤍💜
#WomenOScotland #SexBasedRights
CASE UPDATE: Last Wednesday, my lawyers were back in the Queensland Supreme Court defending me in what has become a seven-year legal saga over my criticism of “Drag Queen Story Time” events for children.
I was unable to attend the hearing due to a prior commitment in Canberra, but the issues at stake could not be more important.
The case began in 2020 when I was living in Brisbane. I wrote a blog arguing that drag queens promoting gender fluid ideology to children in a Council library were dangerous role models. I stand by that assessment today.
After reviewing the public social media content of the drag queens involved, I believed parents had every right to be alerted to the messages and values being presented to children in taxpayer-funded public libraries.
That blog triggered legal action against me.
I was compelled into mediation through the Queensland Human Rights Commission, a taxpayer-funded body which embraces the idea that a man can be a woman and appears comfortable with sexualised queer culture being promoted to children.
When the complainants failed to secure an apology or force me to censor my views, they took me to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
The matter finally went to trial in 2022. In 2023, I received a judgment vindicating my position.
With the assistance of taxpayer-funded lawyers from the LGBT Legal Service, the drag queens appealed.
Following a three-day appeal hearing in March 2025, I received a decision from the Queensland Civil and Administrative Appeal Tribunal 11 months later which upheld their appeal and sent the matter back for reconsideration.
While no finding of vilification has ever been made against me, the decision was a significant setback.
My legal team has now sought Judicial Review of that appeal decision in the Supreme Court. Last Wednesday's hearing concerned an application by the drag queens to have my Judicial Review case struck out before I can fully argue it.
They are also seeking extraordinary orders that would require me to indemnify them against legal costs. In other words, they want me to pay their costs even if I ultimately win. Make that make sense.
This case highlights a fundamental problem with Australia's anti-discrimination and anti-vilification laws.
People who possess protected attributes relating to sexuality or gender are granted special legal avenues to pursue those who question the ideology underpinning their identity claims. The result is a chilling effect on public debate and political commentary.
These laws are increasingly being used against free speech, and they need reform if Australians are to retain the freedom to discuss matters of public importance.
Parents cannot protect children from harmful gender ideology or sexualised activist culture if people are too frightened to speak about these issues.
Yet where are the politicians willing to fix these laws?
At present, there are very few.
That is one reason I have been involved in rebuilding Family First and why I am standing for the NSW Legislative Council at next year's election.
Without freedom of speech, we are not free.
One final point deserves attention.
Equality Australia, a political lobbying organisation that enjoys special tax-deductible status unavailable to most political advocacy groups, has publicly backed the drag queens pursuing this case against me.
Following my setback in the appeal tribunal, Equality Australia issued a media release welcoming the decision.
The patron of Equality Australia is Governor-General Sam Mostyn. Its co-patron is Shane Jenek, better known by the drag persona Courtney Act.
In my view, it is inappropriate for the Governor-General to lend her office and prestige to an organisation actively supporting efforts to suppress the free speech rights of Australian citizens.
It is also concerning that Equality Australia continues to advocate for Australia's child gender clinic system, where vulnerable children can be placed on pathways involving puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and irreversible medical interventions.
The Supreme Court has reserved its decision. It may be weeks or even months before I know the outcome.
What I do know is that there appears to be no end in sight to the litigation being pursued against me.
I will keep supporters updated as developments occur.
In the meantime, I will continue campaigning as hard as I can for election to the NSW Parliament, because ultimately the solution to Australia's free speech crisis lies not with the courts but with our Parliaments.
36 years ago today Maiden crossed the finish line and sailed into the record books as the first all-female crew to ever sail around the world. We had finished in 2nd place in the 1989/90 WRTR, proving our critics wrong. It was a fantastic day!!
A lot of people have struggled to believe me when I say that the Australian Human Rights Commission is giving pregnancy protections in law to men who claim to be woman, because it’s so stupid it’s hard to believe anyone would say it.
Enjoy:
To be honest Sall, we’re not sure how you are still standing, you must be exhausted! Look after yourself, take a break if needed. You’ve brought so much attention to this globally, everyone who’s aware of your fight & the other brave Australian women, will keep the messages going
ACTION: 29/08/2026. We're aware it's the Sat of August Bank Hol weekend, but we're planning something huge (London). It'll be 500 Days since the #SuprmeCourtRuling & it'll be a few days short of #203Years since The Gaols Act 1823. Make your plans #500DaysLater#203YearsLater
Imagine this: a group of working-class white men flood into Parliament Square on a Saturday afternoon, waving Union Jack flags.
Among them are known criminals—some with violent records. They shout abuse, deface statues, urinate on memorials. They hold signs with slogans like “The only good immigrant is a dead one,” “Bring back witch-burning of brown people,” and “Piss on Muslims.”
Can you imagine the reaction?
The police would be out in full riot gear. Journalists would descend like vultures. Front pages would scream about a fascist uprising. Politicians across the spectrum would line up to condemn it. There would be emergency debates in Parliament.
The working class would once again be blamed for dragging Britain into barbarism. It would be treated as a national crisis.
Now imagine the same scene—but swap the Fred Perry shirts for dresses. Swap the football chants for chants of “trans rights are human rights.” Keep the abuse. Keep the criminal records.
Keep the vandalism and the threats—only now, the targets are women. Lesbians. Feminist.
Survivors of male violence.
And instead of swastikas or white power slogans, the flags are Progress Pride and trans stripes.
Now imagine the reaction.
Actually, you don’t have to. Because that happened. And no one cared.
There was no national outcry. No political reckoning. No police crackdown. No headlines about hate movements. No pundits drawing historical parallels to fascism or authoritarianism. Instead, there was silence—or worse, celebration. Because these weren’t angry working-class blokes the liberal elite loves to loathe. These were the approved kind of extremists: middle-class men in lipstick, cloaked in the language of rights and inclusion.
They can say “die, TERF.” They can threaten rape and disfigurement. They can silence women, stalk them, spit at them, doxx them. They can scream “no debate” while waving signs glorifying violence. And institutions—media, government, academia—will protect them. Not just tolerate them, but fund them. Platform them. Cheer them on.
Because identity, in this warped political moment, trumps behaviour. And gender identity, in particular, has become the ultimate shield. It turns men into victims, women into villains, and violence into virtue—so long as it's directed at the right targets.
This isn’t just hypocrisy. It’s systemic gaslighting. It’s a two-tier society where some people can say and do anything under the banner of “progress,” while others are hounded for speaking plain truth.
We’re told to imagine a dystopia of hate. But the real nightmare is already here—and it’s wearing a dress.
#ThisIsTrans
Haven't finished my short film yet, but in the meantime here's a fab pic of two of Saturday's organisers.
Yes, the protest was about a serious matter but as we all know, you've gotta laugh or you'll cry.
#IStandWithSallGrover#FixTheSDA@acts_grassroots@MrMennoTweets