Since stereotypes are culturally inherited and transmitted knowledge, rather than knowledge systematically discovered by scientists, this leads to an amusing conclusion: one of the most robust findings in social psychology is that some of its most reliable knowledge about people was discovered not by social psychologists, but by ordinary people and transmitted culturally long before psychologists got around to testing it.
modern women are just vessels for “stuff”. some of that stuff is love and motherhood. but some of that is also, like, different flavors of “facial mist”, whatever that is. thank god we have them to prop up the consumer economy.
men just eat and poop.
@LAngles1974753@lsterman not disagreeing with your second point but as someone who’s spent time in west county (and the west coast lol), downtown STL is the wild west
and don’t get me started on kingshighway and lindell in the CWE lol. traffic enforcement is a huge problem
@ponquecitos@BenJohnsonary@ryxcommar it exists already. anything below primate/canid/felid intelligence is kosher to eat. more consistent in the west but not really that different in other non-tribal cultures.
*Man holding gun to his head* “If 51% of the people in this room don’t hold a gun to their head the guns all go off and we die.”
“What if we just didn’t hold a gun to our head?”
“Wow you’re literally only concerned about yourself. Unbelievable.”
no disrespect to the homies in wheelchairs. but gotta feel so good when you hit a sweet downhill section. wind in your hair type shit. silver linings i guess.
If the market reacts appropriately, there will be no wide-scale AI fucking of americans.
1. a major claim is that friction-dependent economies will dissolve in response to agent-human or agent-agent interactions. real-world feasibility is major leaps and bounds from what this guy is predicting, but that’s up for debate so i won’t bother arguing. rather, shifting liability to AI will usher in far more problems than it will solve. corporations only care about bottom lines and risk. if a fleet of autonomous real-estate purchasing agents has even an error rate of 0.1%, the legal ramifications are far too high to green-light blanket employment. who holds the bag when an agent fucks up? will a home buyer really establish trust with a well-trained model? how do hallucinations play in? all of this opens the possibility of human-based arbitrage in widespread sectors. if a SME can beat agents in deals at a 70% success rate, his skills will be wildly valued. skill issue, and the human-based sector must survive. same goes for programming but from a security/vulnerability attack vector.
2. so, so, so many claims that “AI is better than any human at almost every human skill”. bullshit. every AI use case is downstream/derivative of human skill and always will be. AI can’t and won’t take wedding photos, front capital for R&D, or snipe would-be presidential assassins. it’s use case is and always will be in purely generative, non-creative domains. glory to god that we might find ourselves moving towards tasteful, artistic, and truly creative forms of production rather than wage-slavery. much more aligned with the human spirit — which has been corrupted in the societal assembly line of post-industrialism
ultimately the disruption is real but the possibilities are endless. you think anyone 40 years ago could have imagined the things you can do with Excel macros? or electric cars? or being an influencer. these are massive swaths of the economy — some which will persist and some which will rightfully disappear. no chance the machines are beating humanity lol
deadbeat is the indie/psych rock fusion with house and dance music. same way that honestly nevermind was drake’s attempt to mix house + rap. both solid albums. haters are incapable of escaping their own lane