rouge

[rouge @rouge3696]

@MattisRedacted So he did not... die? So Christianity is false?

[rouge @rouge3696]

@WESTBEAST171171 @IjazTheTrini @estebansarrazol When you count the dogs, do you count one dog or two dogs?

[rouge @rouge3696]

@Rurouni_Phoenix I don't see where 51:47 describes the sky simply as a stretched tent. I only see "We are la musi'una", which can be interpreted in several ways: "We are expanding it, we are its expanders, we can expand it, we are able to" etc. It's a property of its Creator, not itself

[rouge @rouge3696]

@LucyIvimy Christianity didn't topple any empire, it simply absorbed the paganism of its time. And lol, Christianity is FAR from monotheism. You worship a 3-in-1 shampoo bottle god.

[rouge @rouge3696]

@LucyIvimy So Jesus is not the God of the Old Testament? So the Son is more moral than the Father?

[rouge @rouge3696]

@LucyIvimy Wrong. The Quran says it appeared to the people as such, which is in line with historical data. What the Quran denies is its ontological reality and the concept of vicarious atonement through human sacrifice, which is a lie from the pits of hell unfounded in the Hebrew Bible.

[rouge @rouge3696]

@commygrly123 @RealShahriqKhan Yet you replied to me thrice with empty replies lol. Roundabout way of saying you don't have an answer.

[rouge @rouge3696]

@ContraryChristn @RealShahriqKhan They certainly do because they are lies. There is a reason so much emphasis is put in the gospels on Jesus' descent from David. He could not have descended from David (because virgin birth), and all reconstructions of his lineages are contradictory. So is he even the son of David

[rouge @rouge3696]

@Ron172892111531 @RachelMHoffer @RealShahriqKhan For example Matthew's agenda being trying hard to portray Jesus as Davidic at all fronts by making 14 generations between different time periods because 14 is the numerical value of David's name. What is the source of their genealogies? No one knows.

[rouge @rouge3696]

@Ron172892111531 @RachelMHoffer @RealShahriqKhan You are claimimg a bunch of stuff without providing any evidence. Why would Luke/Matt need to have had access to James and the church? Who are they in the first place? Certainly not the eye witnesses as there is no evidence for that. Both authors have personal agendas (cont.)

[rouge @rouge3696]

@Ron172892111531 @RealShahriqKhan

[rouge @rouge3696]

@Ron172892111531 @RachelMHoffer @RealShahriqKhan On the contrary, Luke says that Mary is related to Elizabeth, who is explicitly stated to be a Levite, so Mary may even be a Levite. Which church father said Luke's genealogy is of Mary's? It was a lie forged in the 15th century by John Annius of Viterbo.

[rouge @rouge3696]

@Ron172892111531 @RachelMHoffer @RealShahriqKhan In fact, Luke nowhere indicates that Mary is of the house of David, even when the opportunity arises, such as in Luke 1:5, where he calls Joseph of the house of David, because mother's genealogy is completely irrelevant when it comes to establishing lineage.. (cont.)

[rouge @rouge3696]

@stephenstaunchy @RealShahriqKhan AI slop that has 0 proof 0 references. Where are the church fathers that say this? What does a royal lineage mean? That Jesus was not descended from those people? How was he descended from two different lines simultaneously? 0 bible verses provided.

[rouge @rouge3696]

@stephenstaunchy @RealShahriqKhan Give me the source for this "basic research" you talk of.