Recently ๐ช๐ธ Rafael Nadal says that his record of 14 Roland Garros titles will be harder to break than ๐ท๐ธ Novak Djokovicโs 24 Slams.
From a probabilistic point of view, is he right? I asked to very deep-thinker AI to answer
@piggysensei2 Show me a successful company that never adapted to change? They are doing everything to survive and be successful in challenging market conditions. It might work in the longer run or fail miserably but thatโs why itโs called a Risk asset. Why are so stuck up on they pivoting?
@piggysensei2@HenryInvests What are you benefiting from โtelling the truthโ? You either are short or just pissed off that you are underwater on your position and shit posting all the time
@EVIp4UDS3aYWEUF@sjpark Why canโt you sell? That shows you are unsure of what you own. You need to have clarity on why you own. When you get that understanding you will either sell the next min or hold it and donโt check the price every hour and wait for that inflection point in the business.
Roland-Garros Titles:
14 - Nadal
13 -
12 -
11 -
10 -
9 -
8 - Nadal in his 20s
7 -
6 - Borg
5 - Nadal in his 30s
4 - Nadal without dropping a set
3 - Wilander, Lendl, Kuerten, Djokovic
2 - Kodes, Courier, Bruguera, Alcaraz
1 - Nadal in his teens, Federer
๐จ โ๐๐๐ ๐พ๐ผ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐.โ ๐ง๏ธ
One of the most powerful stories from Episode 2 of ๐ฅ๐๐๐.
When Rafael Nadal was a kid, Uncle Toni used to tell him:
โ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ค๐ช๐ง ๐ค๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ค๐ฃ๐๐ฃ๐ฉ ๐๐จ ๐๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐๐๐ฃ ๐ฎ๐ค๐ช, ๐โ๐ก๐ก ๐ข๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ฉ ๐ง๐๐๐ฃ.โ
The lesson was simple.
If youโre the weaker player, you need something to disrupt the match. Something to make life harder for the better player.
For years, Rafa grew up believing that.
Then came Wimbledon.
In 2006, Federer beat him in the final.
In 2007, Nadal came agonizingly close. He pushed Federer to five sets and had chances to win, but later admitted he lost focus at crucial moments and watched the title slip away.
That defeat stayed with him.
A year later, he returned for another shot.
๐ช๐ถ๐บ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ด.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ.
After years of chasing Federer, Nadal stormed to a two-set lead and stood on the brink of his first Wimbledon title.
But champions donโt surrender their throne easily.
Federer saved championship points, won two epic tiebreaks, and dragged the match into a fifth set.
Then the rain came.
Play was suspended.
As they walked into the locker room, Toni was convinced Rafa would be devastated. He had seen the pain of 2006. He had seen the heartbreak of 2007. Watching Federer escape from two sets down and force a deciding set, he didn't even know what to say.
Before Toni could speak, Rafa looked at him and calmly said:
โ๐๐ค๐ช ๐๐๐ฃ ๐จ๐ฉ๐ค๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ฃ. ๐โ๐ข ๐ฃ๐ค๐ฉ ๐๐ค๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ฉ๐ค ๐ก๐ค๐จ๐.โ
Think about that.
The little boy who once needed the rain because his opponents were better than him was gone.
The player who had lost two straight Wimbledon finals to Federer was gone.
The man sitting in that locker room wasn't hoping.
He wasnโt nervous.
He wasnโt looking for help from the conditions.
He wasnโt asking for the rain.
He was asking for it to stop.
Because for the first time in his life, standing across the net from Roger Federer on Centre Court, Rafael Nadal no longer believed Federer was the better player.
A few hours later, he proved it. ๐
Rafa Nadal opens up like never before about what shaped one of the greatest tennis careers of all time.
RAFA, a new documentary series, is now on Netlfix.
The US Open Tennis AMEX ticket presale opened up at 9am on Ticketmaster this morning. Predictably, all the tickets were hoovered up by resellers within minutes.
15 minutes later the only tickets that were available were "verified resale" tickets for 3 times the face value.
Why are @usopen tickets QUADRUPLE the price of last year?
@Ticketmaster
The same seats that were $600 last year are $2400 this year???? That's insane.
And this is supposed to be @AmericanExpress presale???? WTF
@usta
@HenryInvests Other side will be phenomenal especially if it is as they claim that their AI is the best in class in risk separation and that they have a 14 year head start compared to anyone who wants to replicate their model.
@HenryInvests Not really, will be re-rated for sure if it feels the growth is stalling. But as long as they can show the volume acceleration, stock price can only go up.