rrrnickson

fam office | DeFi & venture plays | trading onchain meta

[XO @Trader_XO]

Bookmarked

[0xMarioNawfal @RoundtableSpace]

Loops are the meta right now

If you’re having issues engineering loops you need to bookmark this post and read it

https://t.co/adPr1X4NMz

[leopardracer @leopardracer]

RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES EARNS 66% A YEAR. ZERO PUBLIC CODE. SOMEONE JUST LEAKED THEIR ENTIRE STRUCTURE ON GITHUB

fundamentals analyst alongside sentiment analyst alongside bull and bear researchers arguing against each other alongside a full risk team and a portfolio manager signing off on every trade

all of it sitting on GitHub under Apache 2.0

76,800 stars and still climbing

the moat isn't the code anymore

bookmark & like this so your feed shows you more of what they don't want you to know

[Anatoli Kopadze @AnatoliKopadze]

the engineer who built Claude Code just dropped a 28-minute video on how to write prompts that actually work

I've seen $300 courses that don't cover what he shows in the first 10 minutes

CLAUDE.md files, memory shortcuts, parallel sessions, prompting patterns

all in one video and completely free

works whether you're a developer, a beginner, or someone who's been using Claude for months

based on this, I put together 18 things you can copy and use in Claude today

full guide in the article below

[Derive Insights @deriveinsights]

https://t.co/MSlOC2FBja

[Derive Insights @deriveinsights]

https://t.co/1x0fxOL97x

[AdiiX @adiix_official]

How to Build and Turn $15k into $1.1M in 20 Days Using Arbitrage Bot

Claude Bot scaled a deposit up to $1.1M

By trading 5-min and 15-min markets on Polymarket

Bot using this strategy:

- Mispricing formula
- Expected value calculation
- Kelly Criterion sizing

mispricing found → EV calced → kelly sizing → enter

> 25,123 trades
> 83.9% win rate
> +1.1M profit
> Biggest win 33K

Check this profile here:

https://t.co/zxFYpYKw83

Copytrading:

https://t.co/Y5XMkU8U3q

If you wish to do the same

I have outlined exactly how to create your own bot in my article

Which is also where I told the story of how Claude turned $300 into 2.4M in 4 months

This week I will write an article “Why your bot isn’t working and how to fix it”

So follow and save this post

[Justin Drake @drakefjustin]

Today is a monumentous day for quantum computing and cryptography. Two breakthrough papers just landed (links in next tweet). Both papers improve Shor's algorithm, infamous for cracking RSA and elliptic curve cryptography. The two results compound, optimising separate layers of the quantum stack. The results are shocking. I expect a narrative shift and a further R&D boost toward post-quantum cryptography.

The first paper is by Google Quantum AI. They tackle the (logical) Shor algorithm, tailoring it to crack Bitcoin and Ethereum signatures. The algorithm runs on ~1K logical qubits for the 256-bit elliptic curve secp256k1. Due to the low circuit depth, a fast superconducting computer would recover private keys in minutes. I'm grateful to have joined as a late paper co-author, in large part for the chance to interact with experts and the alpha gleaned from internal discussions.

The second paper is by a stealthy startup called Oratomic, with ex-Google and prominent Caltech faculty. Their starting point is Google's improvements to the logical quantum circuit. They then apply improvements at the physical layer, with tricks specific to neutral atom quantum computers. The result estimates that 26,000 atomic qubits are sufficient to break 256-bit elliptic curve signatures. This would be roughly a 40x improvement in physical qubit count over previous state-of-the-art. On the flip side, a single Shor run would take ~10 days due to the relatively slow speed of neutral atoms.

Below are my key takeaways. As a disclaimer, I am not a quantum expert. Time is needed for the results to be properly vetted. Based on my interactions with the team, I have faith the Google Quantum AI results are conservative. The Oratomic paper is much harder for me to assess, especially because of the use of more exotic qLDPC codes. I will take it with a grain of salt until the dust settles.

→ q-day: My confidence in q-day by 2032 has shot up significantly. IMO there's at least a 10% chance that by 2032 a quantum computer recovers a secp256k1 ECDSA private key from an exposed public key. While a cryptographically-relevant quantum computer (CRQC) before 2030 still feels unlikely, now is undoubtedly the time to start preparing.
→ censorship: The Google paper uses a zero-knowledge (ZK) proof to demonstrate the algorithm's existence without leaking actual optimisations. From now on, assume state-of-the-art algorithms will be censored. There may be self-censorship for moral or commercial reasons, or because of government pressure. A blackout in academic publications would be a tell-tale sign.
→ cracking time: A superconducting quantum computer, the type Google is building, could crack keys in minutes. This is because the optimised quantum circuit is just 100M Toffoli gates, which is surprisingly shallow. (Toffoli gates are hard because they require production of so-called "magic states".) Toffoli gates would consume ~10 microseconds on a superconducting platform, totalling ~1,000 sec of Shor runtime.
→ latency optimisations: Two latency optimisations bring key cracking time to single-digit minutes. The first parallelises computation across quantum devices. The second involves feeding the pubkey to the quantum computer mid-flight, after a generic setup phase.
→ fast- and slow-clock: At first approximation there are two families of quantum computers. The fast-clock flavour, which includes superconducting and photonic architectures, runs at roughly 100 kHz. The slow-clock flavour, which includes trapped ion and neutral atom architectures, runs roughly 1,000x slower (~100 Hz, or ~1 week to crack a single key).
→ qubit count: The size-optimised variant of the algorithm runs on 1,200 logical qubits. On a superconducting computer with surface code error correction that's roughly 500K physical qubits, a 400:1 physical-to-logical ratio. The surface code is conservative, assuming only four-way nearest-neighbour grid connectivity. It was demonstrated last year by Google on a real quantum computer.
→ future gains: Low-hanging fruit is still being picked, with at least one of the Google optimisations resulting from a surprisingly simple observation. Interestingly, AI was not (yet!) tasked to find optimisations. This was also the first time authors such as Craig Gidney attacked elliptic curves (as opposed to RSA). Shor logical qubit count could plausibly go under 1K soonish.
→ error correction: The physical-to-logical ratio for superconducting computers could go under 100:1. For superconducting computers that would be mean ~100K physical qubits for a CRQC, two orders of magnitude away from state of the art. Neutral atoms quantum computers are amenable to error correcting codes other than the surface code. While much slower to run, they can bring down the physical to logical qubit ratio closer to 10:1.
→ Bitcoin PoW: Commercially-viable Bitcoin PoW via Grover's algorithm is not happening any time soon. We're talking decades, possibly centuries away. This observation should help focus the discussion on ECDSA and Schnorr. (Side note: as unofficial Bitcoin security researcher, I still believe Bitcoin PoW is cooked due to the dwindling security budget.)
→ team quality: The folks at Google Quantum AI are the real deal. Craig Gidney (@CraigGidney) is arguably the world's top quantum circuit optimisooor. Just last year he squeezed 10x out of Shor for RSA, bringing the physical qubit count down from 10M to 1M. Special thanks to the Google team for patiently answering all my newb questions with detailed, fact-based answers. I was expecting some hype, but found none.

[zostaff @zostaff]

when did you manage to combine Claude, Clawdbot and Codex

[dfinzer.eth | opensea @dfinzer]

an update on $SEA.

the team has been building at full speed, and the foundation had planned to kick off the first steps as part of our march 30th event. but @openseafdn is pushing back the timeline.

a delay is a delay. i’m not going to dress it up, and i know how it lands.

the reality is that market conditions are challenging across crypto right now, and $SEA only launches once. @openseafdn could force the original date, or we could ensure every piece is in place and make this moment what this community deserves.

we gave a tremendous amount of thought to how to do right here. I’m thankful to @HollanderAdam for bringing the community’s voice into every conversation. we’ll be doing the following:

no more waves: the current rewards wave will be our last.

optional fee refund: recognizing that we originally committed to a Q1 date, we’re offering refunds of the platform fees we retained while participating in the rewards waves (3 - 6) that followed our timing announcement. if you like, you can receive a refund of those fees, which when combined with treasure chest prizes, essentially means all of your trading during that period was on us. if you opt for a refund, the Treasures you were awarded during these waves will be removed from your account. details on this process will follow.

honoring existing Treasures: for Treasures you continue to hold, our prior commitment stands: they will be meaningfully considered by the Foundation at TGE. this is independent from allocations for historical activity.

0% fees for 60 days: starting on march 31st, opensea will reduce our own token trading fees to 0%. we want to make it a no-brainer for everyone to experience our new platform: cross-chain token trading, mobile app, perps and more. after this 60 day period, we will put a new system in place that makes fees significantly more competitive for anyone trading consistently on opensea.

product updates: while we’re postponing our march 30th event, we’ll host a separate one in the coming months focused on product updates. it’s been incredible to see the early responses to our mobile app, and we can’t wait to get it into more people’s hands.

so if not now, wen?

when we announced last year, it was too early. that created unnecessary uncertainty and reactivity. so when the Foundation sets a new timeline, it will be deliberate and specific.

here’s why i’m confident that’s the right move:

i’ve been building opensea for almost a decade. when this started, we were two people and the only thing you could trade on OS was cryptokitties. i’ve watched this space go from a niche curiosity to billions in volume to where we are today.

the thing that’s carried us through every cycle was a willingness to make hard calls when it mattered. when our market crashed, we rebuilt from zero: an entirely new stack, a new product, and a new team culture. that hurt in the short term. but today OS2 is undeniably the strongest marketplace offering, and it’s the foundation everything sits on.

we have huge ambitions as a company, and we’re here for the long game. making all of non-custodial crypto delightful on mobile is just the beginning. that means we have to set a very high bar for everything we do, and it’s why i’m so protective of delivering a launch that’s worthy of this community and everything we’re putting into this.

[sellnotbuy @kxazar]

Robo narrative is next big thing

My picks:

$CODEC - team has been scaling up and is getting ready to drop big update

$ST - been cooking in stealth mode for a while, fully locked in on dev. With $VIRTUAL eco gearing up for its pivot into robo, this could end up being gainer

$DREAMS - Lucid is practically ready to launch. This is what the team has been building toward for last months

$SOL (🍅) - looks great. A lot of tokens on @BagsApp flopped because their founders have zero understanding of what's actually going on, just hipsters vibecoding because it's trendy. @d33v33d0 is different. Openly engages with the community and actively ships. On top of that, it's part of the PF eco, and @a1lon9 main priority rn is giving eco real technology

April 1st, Tesla hosting what's shaping up to be their biggest presentation ever. SpaceX IPO is expected over the summer. Optimus androids are targeting mass production by end of year. The marketing wave around all of this is going to be massive

[Bluntz @Bluntz_Capital]

teradyne now +130%.

ai infra picks and shovels plays outperforming everything

$TER

[0xMarioNawfal @RoundtableSpace]

Instead of watching Netflix, learn how this guy turned $20k into $40M

Automate his strategy using clawdbot

[Frank @frankdegods]

X just revamped their API to finally be useful

So I made a skill that searches X, modeled exactly like the native Claude Code research agent

I've been asking like "find best clawdbot skills last 24hrs" or "what are people saying about [ticker] today?"

https://t.co/RHtYxF7pZH

[exitpump @exitpumpBTC]

All you have to know about CVD. Pair it with Open Interest and you’ll get a clear picture of order flow.

[OpenClaw🦞 @openclaw]

🦞 OpenClaw v2026.2.6 is here!

🧠 Opus 4.6 + GPT-5.3-Codex support
⚡ xAI Grok + Baidu Qianfan providers
📊 Token usage dashboard
🧭 Voyage AI for memory
🔒 Skill code safety scanner
🔧 Cron fixes galore

Security hardening across the board 🛡️ https://t.co/2XU4FHZrBT

[Ondo Perps @OndoPerps]

https://t.co/JFwoyqeqJ7

[kook 🏝️ @KookCapitalLLC]

woah @tradexyz bought tickers for natural gas and uranium

hip-3 commodity perps supercycle????

[rrrnickson @rrrnickson]

looks interesting to test

[Nomina @Nomina]

NOW LIVE on Nomina: @extendedapp

Run delta neutral strategies across Extended + Hyperliquid + Lighter.

More spreads. More points. More profit.

Expecting more.