Robbie

Yes! He is finally nigh! coys

[Felon82 @Felon82]

Just so we're clear

You shouldn't be able to use other revenue streams to grow transfer funds organically

But you should be allowed to let billionaires buy you titles ?

Where did those billions come from that were related to football?

[UEFA @UEFA]

UEFA statement on the Balogun case: ⬇️
https://t.co/9LQDx8waKe

[Jack D 🏳️‍🌈🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @JackDunc1]

FIFA's own rules dictate that if a government tries to intervene in a disciplinary matter - that team is disqualified. Not happening to the USA though, despite trump making that phone call. Wonder why. 🤔

Fuck Trump. Fuck Infantino.

[Active Patriot @ActivePatriotUK]

🚨 20-year-old Cody Harper is at Birmingham Magistrates Court on the 23rd July, charged with assaulting, a police officer. ( I Don't Think He Has Mate) You've all seen the video that went viral. Get down there if you can and back him up, they want to stick him in jail. Demand justice for Cody

[🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🚀 @blthfc]

Spurs generate roughly £60m a year from concerts and sporting events.

To all the fans who went to our boxing shows to sing ‘We hate Tottenham’, thank you for funding our revival.

Thank you for paying £13 for a Daniel Levy NFL hotdog. It’s much appreciated.

[Mark Goldbridge @markgoldbridge]

No way Tonali goes Spurs but if we don't enter the race now we look stupid

[Mark Goldbridge @markgoldbridge]

Spurs trying to hijack the Fernandes deal lol! It's like a puppy trying to take a bone from a lion

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

🚨 I do not make historical comparisons lightly.

Your government, in line with UN priorities. is moving to crush all information not sanctioned by them.

In 1933, Goebbels argued that Germans needed protection from false information and dangerous ideas.

In 2026, Starmer says that British people need protection from “disinformation” and that social media platforms should prioritise BBC and state approved broadcaster content.

The comparison is NOT that Britain is Nazi Germany. That is a lazy argument.

The comparison is that Starmer’s government is pushing for more control over what citizens read, watch and think and that they claim it’s for our own good.

You are not free if the State decided what news you are allowed to view.

This is not the work of a government supporting democracy but one that
Doesn’t trust its citizens to keep them in power.

[British Intel @TheBritishIntel]

🇬🇧 STARMER HAS NO MANDATE FOR A SURVEILLANCE STATE

Keir Starmer says he will continue delivering the agenda he was elected on.

The problem is that mass online surveillance, digital ID checks, facial recognition requirements and internet censorship were never put to the British people.

No one voted for this.

No one was asked whether they wanted the Government monitoring access to social media or expanding state control over the internet.

This was not in the manifesto.

Starmer is governing as though he has a mandate for measures the public were never given the chance to approve.

[Kevin Bass @kevinnbass]

We are hearing most British parents support the social media ban.

That's because they weren't given a choice to oppose it.

The poll was rigged to give the illusion of consensus.

People of the UK- your country is being ruled by a man who fancies himself a Third World dictator.

[John Scott-Railton @jsrailton]

The ban will fail. But the privacy loss will be permanent.

Long after UK teens have bypassed it (just as Australian kids did, by the way)...

...the British will be stuck self-doxxing to surveillance gatekeepers to use the internet.

Embarrassing legacy for Starmer, who should know better.

And a daily reminder to Brits of government overreach.

[Dr Glover| SAC: DRGLOVER @Dr_Gl0ver]

At 17 you can

Have consensual sex
Have a kid
Drive a car
Work a job
Vote
Donate blood
Join the army

BUT you CANNOT watch YouTube after your allocated government bedtime lmao

[Shotty Horroh @ShottyHorroh]

At least every single fanbase in the league are in unison and all agree that Arsenal and PGMOL have cheated this season. Timeline is just full of prem fans calling it out. Fair play.

[Brock ⚽️ @StunningSpurs]

#THFC

⚠️Warning: AI-generated report based on real data that I grabbed from PL website and StatMuse:

Premier League Ref Treatment Index (RTI) 🤔

We have been incessantly arguing about referees.

So instead of clips and “that felt like a pen,” I wanted to build something around actual outcomes.

I built a Referee Treatment Index (RTI) to measure how favorable or unfavorable a club's overall outcomes are relative to the opportunities they create.

RTI combines:

• Net Penalties (45%)
→ Pens For − Pens Against

Why it matters:

Penalty decisions are among the highest-impact calls in football and directly affect results.
—————————————————
• Penalties per 1000 Box Touches (35%)

Why it matters:

Raw penalty totals can be misleading. A team with 1300 box touches should naturally generate more penalties than a team with 700.

This asks:

"How many penalties are being generated relative to how often you're actually entering dangerous areas?"
—————————————————
• Card Strictness (20%)

Why it matters:

This measures disciplinary outcomes relative to foul volume.

Do cards appear quickly?

Or does a team require more fouls before punishment arrives?
—————————————————
Higher RTI = more favorable overall outcomes
Lower RTI = less favorable overall outcomes

I also built a Discipline Severity Index (DSI):

DSI = (Card Impact ÷ Fouls) × 100

Card Impact = YC + (5 × RC)

Higher DSI:
🔴 Stronger punishment per foul

Lower DSI:
🟢 Less punishment per foul

📈 Most favorable RTI:
🥇 Brentford: +114.7
🥈 Chelsea: +97.3
🥉 Leeds Utd: +96.7
4️⃣ Arsenal: +78.7
5️⃣ Manchester Utd: +47.5

📉 Least favorable RTI:
20️⃣ Tottenham: -151.9
19️⃣ Burnley: -91.2
18️⃣ West Ham: -72.6
17️⃣ Everton: -70.5
16️⃣ Aston Villa: -60.4

Biggest anomalies:

⚠️ Arsenal — strongest overall profile

• Lowest DSI in league: 13.2
• +4 net penalties
• 0 penalties conceded
• 0 red cards
• 1187 box touches

Not the highest RTI, but definitely the cleanest profile in the dataset.
—————————————————
⚠️ Brentford — highest RTI

• Highest RTI in league (+114.7)
• Only moderate attacking volume (913 box touches)
• Highest penalties per 1000 box touches (10.95)
Generated elite favorable outcomes without elite attacking opportunity.
—————————————————
⚠️ Liverpool — opportunity mismatch

• 1210 box touches
• RTI: -49.7
• Penalties/1000 box touches: 1.65
One of the league's highest attacking opportunity totals with one of the weaker treatment profiles.
—————————————————
⚠️ Chelsea — contradiction profile

• RTI: +97.3
• Highest DSI: 29.7
• Highest Card Impact: 118
Strong favorable outcomes overall while simultaneously receiving the strongest disciplinary outcomes.
—————————————————
⚠️ Tottenham — extreme negative outlier

• RTI: -151.9
• DSI: 26.8
• Net penalties: -3
• 4 red cards
The most consistently negative profile across the model.

Data: https://t.co/1k8Eo6GOq0 + https://t.co/GZKi1mR7lE

[Christian @Christianjw92]

Johan Lange genuinely did not think this Tottenham team needed improving in the forward areas.

Could be the reason we get relegated

How has he not been sacked?

[Kurt Mahlburg @k_mahlburg]

Finland tracked every gender-referred adolescent in the country for up to 25 years.

Their psychiatric needs didn't improve after 'gender reassignment'. They surged.

A landmark peer-reviewed study just dropped. Here's what it found. 🧵

[🏛 𝐒𝐭𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 🏛 @nonregemesse]

You’d think a woman whose team was beaten by a team of 15 year old boys would appreciate the need to keep males out of women’s sports

[Adam @AdamJoseph]

Every single club should make a formal complaint. 32 different clubs excluding Chelsea between 2011-2018 & 39 from 2011-2026. They are all affected by Chelsea paying people 'off the books'.

Now why would they need to do that? Because they were bribes. Chelsea bribed agents to steer their clients to them ahead of other clubs, including PL ones. Decisive signings like Eden Hazard.

It is a sporting advantage that still benefits them. Cheating has destroyed the integrity of the PL thanks to Chelsea & City. Even though it'll fall on deaf ears, no club should be silent about it.

[Don Datta @dondatta13]

#NUFC were FORCED to sell Elliot Anderson for £35m. A year and a half later he is expected to fetch around £100m. Weve taken a £65m hit SO WE DON'T break the rules. Meanwhile actual rule breakers Chelsea win multiple PLs and cup, become a top 6 side with all the perks, £10m fine.

[Liam @LiamTalksBall]

Two hands in the back.

Spurs score - it’s a “very, very clear offence.”

Spurs concede - it “doesn’t meet the threshold.”

Explain that.