@GavinNewsom Californians have no one to blame for high gas prices except for their own one-party, left-wing, environmental-extremist, Socialist-Democrat leadership they voted into office.
https://t.co/jaJ9kd7a9P
@CAgovernor Californians have no one to blame for high gas prices except for their own one-party, left-wing, environmental-extremist, Socialist-Democrat leadership they voted into office.
https://t.co/jaJ9kd7a9P
Californians have no one to blame for high gas prices except for their own one-party, left-wing, environmental-extremist, Socialist-Democrat leadership they voted into office.
https://t.co/jaJ9kd7a9P
Even Arab leaders admit it.
Everyone is sharing the Bill Clinton clip where he describes how Yasser Arafat rejected a generous peace offer at Camp David that would have given the Palestinians a state on 96 percent of the West Bank, land swaps, and a capital in East Jerusalem. Clinton says Arafat lied to him and that the Palestinian leadership never actually wanted a two-state solution. They wanted to destroy Israel. It’s a video often shared by people like @VividProwess, and it’s an important one for people to see.
Of course, critics immediately dismiss it. They claim Clinton is biased or he’s pro-Israel. They’ll tell you that you cannot trust the American perspective.
Ok, so let us set that aside.
Now watch this.
In this powerful interview, former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a major Arab leader who was directly involved in negotiations, says exactly the same thing from the Arab side. He talks about the Mena House Conference in Cairo as well as the Camp David negotiations of 1978. All failed because of the Palestinians repeatedly rejecting any offer. The Oslo accords were signed but because Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad were not involved, they derailed the accords and any chance for peace by initiating 4 years of terrorist suicide attacks in Israel. Then came the second Camp David negotiations in 2000 which Arafat agreed to, then rejected and instead initiated the Second Intifada.
Mubarak explains how the Palestinians refused to even participate in the Mena House conference of 1977. He describes repeated opportunities they were given, including a detailed document that called for Israeli withdrawal from the Samaria, Judea and Gaza, security arrangements during a transitional period, and other major concessions. The Israelis were willing to negotiate on difficult issues like who would control security. The Palestinians, according to Mubarak, kept saying no and wasting chance after chance.
He speaks with clear frustration about how for decades the Palestinian side has rejected peace initiatives and realistic compromises.
The video further shows footage from the PLO representative in 1977, as well as old footage of Egyptian president Sadat who was involved in the Mena House and first Camp David negotiations of 1978.
This perhaps is far more impactful than Clinton’s account because it is not a Western or Israeli voice. It is prominent Arab leaders who lived the negotiations, who represented the broader Arab world, and who had zero incentive to defend Israel.
When leaders from both sides of the table describe the same pattern of Palestinian rejectionism and violence, it becomes much harder to dismiss as bias.
The pattern is clear across decades and across different voices… generous offers, repeated refusals, and continued demands for everything while giving nothing in return.
This is not ancient history. It is the core reason the conflict continues today.
If you value the truth, please share.
The murd*r of an innocent grandmother (54-year-old Sylvia Nunez-Villalobos), mother (23-year-old Fabiola Gonzalez-Nunez), and her newborn son Mateo Gonzalez by a criminal illegal alien could have been prevented if sanctuary politicians in California simply cooperated with ICE law enforcement.
https://t.co/G4CAdQdP49
President Dwight D. Eisenhower and War Secretary Robert Gates warned EU allies they must pay their fair share of NATO's defense burden.
Eisenhower (1953): "The American well can run dry."
Gates (2011): "There will be a dim if not dismal future for NATO if European governments continue underinvesting in their militaries and a dwindling appetite and patience among American lawmakers and taxpayers to bear a disproportionate share of the alliance's defense costs."
@POTUS Trump is the first statesman to do something about it.
https://t.co/XCbbkX2P6v
Eventually, the Russian/Ukraine war and Iran conflict will end, but the pressure is all on our adversaries to settle sooner than later.
US consumers are temporarily paying more for fuel and food due to a worldwide energy supply shock, but the US economy is benefitting handsomely from our rapidly increasing market share of EU LNG imports:
'21 (pre-Ukraine war) - 24% US market share
'25 (pre-Iran conflict) - 56%
'26 (post-Iran conflict) - 63%
'30 (projected) - 80%
Meanwhile, Russia's share of EU gas imports fell from 45% to 12%, and Iran's market share of worldwide oil imports (thanks to US naval blockade) have plummeted to 0%.
Russia and Iran oil and gas exports account for ~20% of their respective GDP's.
https://t.co/0CfqqCvEBW
Mr. Hassett also implied that MCSI (and its alleged DEM dominated survey participants) reports worse consumer data than the broader Consumer Confidence Index (CCI). While both indices have trended downward during Trump II, it is true that MCSI surveys have been worse than CCI surveys. But is that only due to survey participant bias?
Not necessarily. It may be the result of what the two indices measure and how they weight their variables. MCSI has a "Pocketbook" focus vs. CCI's "Job Market" focus. MCSI weights immediate personal finance, real income changes, and retail buying conditions much higher. This makes it hypersensitive to fuel prices and grocery inflation. CCI places heavy emphasis on employment availability and active labor market conditions.
When reviewing the chart below, comparing MCSI vs. CCI survey data from '17 - '26, note the following:
1. MCSI data was actually better than CCI during Trump I and worse during Biden's term and Trump II; and
2. pocketbook inflation resulting from Biden's post-Covid hyper-spending plus Trump's import tariffs and energy crisis are most likely what caused the two indices to flip and diverge.
https://t.co/DclBVbBqJS
Is the University of Michigan's Consumer Sentiment Index (MCSI) biased against Trump, as @WhiteHouse NEC Director Hassett stated on @FoxNewsSunday today?
During Trump I, MCSI (Jan '17 = 100) never ventured below 90 until Covid.
During Biden's term, MCSI tanked to 50 when the Consumer Price Index (CPI) including food & fuel soared to 9%.
During Trump II, MCSI hit 50 again when CPI is only at 3.8%.
Is that evidence of bias against Trump? Maybe. But why wasn't there MCSI bias during Trump's first term?
Thank you to the ~1.3 million Americans who have died while serving in the U.S. armed forces and intelligence communities across all conflicts from 1775 to the present.
"Greater love has no one than this, that a person will lay down his life for his friends." - John 15:13
God, duty and the return of moral clarity at West Point.
Isaiah 6:8: "Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? … Here am I! Send me."
https://t.co/iVWdcOcLBC #FoxNews
@SenMarkKelly recklessly damages America's security interests by publicly misstating we are not safe against a foe like China because the Iran conflict has depleted our munitions.
Admiral Paparo, Head of US Pacific Command: "I do not see any real cost on our ability to deter China."
https://t.co/kRKhXT6JDC
To: Pope Leo @Pontifex
Angel families plead with leaders to 'choose' American children over protecting illegal immigrants https://t.co/2vXkNK1Mfn #FoxNews