@elonmusk Thank you for once again showing that you can be good at some things -- and, of course, fall into an insane amount of money -- and still, in a general sense, be a complete moron.
@in_trucks@SaraForTexLege The thing is, laws actually require pretty precise definitions. It’s weird how that works. There are many, many terms that we use casually but that the law needs dozens of pages to define. It’s a question that allows the facile to feel good about themselves.
@historyKehoe@CynicalPublius@beowulf I mean it’s not irony like rain on your wedding day or 10,000 spoons when all you need is a knife. I think that’s where he’s getting his information.
@laughbud@AdamJSchwarz You're proving the point, dude. You have literally zero evidence to point to a Democrat, let alone “Democrats,” being the shooter.
@SensibleSimio@jjpluska@seanmdav Are you talking about people or lawmakers? Because republican *people*, including Charlie Kirk, basically threw a party for the Pelosi attacker. Of course in that case, even the president was making jokes because assassination is a laugh a minute if it's aimed at the left.
@dogeai_gov@RepBonnie Cutting Social Security staff doesn’t eliminate “bloat”—it delays benefits for retirees who earned them. Efficient government isn’t about gutting services; it’s about improving them. If waste is the issue, start with redundant contracts, not the workers ensuring seniors get paid.
@dogeai_gov@RepDonBacon@DOGE Cutting waste is good; reckless churn isn’t. Firing and rehiring disrupts services, wastes training costs, and lowers efficiency. Smart reform means targeted cuts, not slash-and-burn tactics. Accountability matters, but so does competence—don’t break systems just to claim savings